Erratum to Histologic and Histomorphometric Behavior of Microgrooved Zirconia Dental Implants with Immediate Loading. [Clin Implant Dent Relat Res (2014);16:856-872]. doi: 10.1111/cid.12069;Histologic and histomorphometric behavior of microgrooved zirconia dental implants with immediate loading

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 856-872

  Delgado Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio ^a   Calvo Guirado, Jose Luis ^b   Abboud, Marcus ^a   Ramirez Fernandez, Maria Piedad ^b   Mate Sanchez, Jose Eduardo ^b   Negri, Bruno ^b   Rothamel, Daniel ^c  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

BIC; Bone density; Crestal bone preservation; Dental implants; Histomorphometry; Immediate loading; Zirconia

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; DENTAL MATERIAL; TITANIUM; TOOTH IMPLANT; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ALVEOLAR BONE; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BONE DENSITY; BONE IMPLANT INTERFACE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL ETCHING; DOG; LASER; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; PARTIAL DENTURE; PERIODONTIUM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANDOMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME FACTOR; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ANIMALS; BITE FORCE; BONE DENSITY; BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, PARTIAL; DOGS; IMMEDIATE DENTAL IMPLANT LOADING; LASERS; MANDIBLE; PERIODONTIUM; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84938566699     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12368     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. State of the art of oral implants. Periodontol 2000 2008; 47:15-26.
2. Dierens M, Vandeweghe S, Kisch J, Nilner K, De Bruyn H. Long-term follow-up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16-22 years: radiographic and peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:197-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02212.x
3. Malo P, de Araujo NM, Lopes A, Moss SM, Molina GJ. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142:310-320.
4. Jacobs R, Pittayapat P, van Steenberghe D, etal. A split-mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw-shaped titanium implant systems. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37:1119-1127.
5. Javed F, Al-Hezaimi K, Almas K, Romanos GE. Is titanium sensitivity associated with allergic reactions in patients with dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 17:1-6.
6. Siddiqi A, Payne AGT, De Silva RK, Duncan WJ. Titanium allergy: could it affect dental implant integration? Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:673-680.
7. Sicilia A, Custa S, Coma G, etal. Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19:823-835.
8. Flatebo RS, Johannessen AC, Gronningsaeter AG, etal. Host response to titanium dental implant placement evaluated in a human oral model. J Periodontol 2006; 77:1201-1210.
9. Kan JY, Runcharangssaeng K, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Facial gingival tissue stability following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 2- to 8-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26:179-187.
10. Nisapakultorn K, Suphanantachat S, Silkosessak O, Rattanamongkolgul S. Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single-tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21:662-670.
11. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36:428-433.
12. Verdugo F, Simonian K, Nowzari H. Periodontal biotype influence on the volume maintenance of onlay grafts. J Periodontol 2009; 80:816-823.
13. Sailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH, Mattiola A. Single-tooth implant reconstructions: esthetic factors influencing the decision between titanium and zirconia abutments in anterior regions. Eur J Esthet Dent 2007; 2:293-310.
14. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol 2003; 74:557-562.
15. Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Tannenbaum R, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Electrical implications of corrosion forosseointegration of titanium implants. J Dent Res 2011; 90:1389-1397. doi: 10.1177/0022034511408428
16. Messer RL, Tackas G, Mickalonis J, Brown Y, Lewis JB, Wataha JC. Corrosion of machined titanium dental implants under inflammatory conditions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 88:474-481.
17. Özkurt Z, Kazazoglu E. Zirconia dental implants: a literature review. J Oral Implantol 2011; 37:367-376.
18. Koutayas SO, Vagkopoulou T, Pelekanos S, Koidis P, Strub JR. Zirconia in dentistry: part 2. Evidence-based clinical breakthrough. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009; 4:348-380.
19. Adatia ND, Bayne SC, Cooper LF, Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implant abutments. J Prosthodont 2009; 18:17-22.
20. van Brakel R, Noordmans HJ, Frenken J, de Roode R, de Wit GC, Cune MS. The effect of zirconia and titanium implant abutments on light reflection of the supporting soft tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:1172-1178. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02082
21. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Rafaelli L, etal. Biological considerations on the use of zirconia for dental devices. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2007; 20:9-12.
22. Kohal RJ, Baechle M, Han JS, Hueren D, Huebner U, Butsz F. In vitro reaction of human osteoblasts on alumina-toughened zirconia. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:1265-1271.
23. Nevins M, Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schupbach P, Kim DM. Pilot clinical and histological evaluations of a two-piece zirconia implant. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011; 31:157-163.
24. Oliva J, Oliva X, Oliva JD. Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25:336-344.
25. Salihoglu U, Boynuegri D, Engin D, Duman AN, Gokalp P, Balos K. Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconium oxide and titanium alloys: an in vivo human study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26:101-107.
26. Scarano A, Piatelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piatelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004; 75:292-296.
27. Koch FP, Weng D, Krämer S, Biesterfeld S, Jahn-Eimermacher A, Wagner W. Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21:350-356.
28. Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Gallez F, Jung RE, Weber FE. The zirconia implant-bone interface: a preliminary histological evaluation in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 24:691-695.
29. Minamizato T. Slip-cast zirconia dental roots with tunnels drilled by laser process. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:677-684.
30. Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bächle M, Strub JR. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osteointegration: an animal experiment. J Periodontol 2004; 75:1262-1268.
31. Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B, Iverhed M. Bone tissue responses to surface modified zirconia implants: a histomorphometrical and removal torque study in the rabbit. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7:13-20.
32. Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implant with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:662-668.
33. Ferguson SJ, Langhoff JD, Voelter K, etal. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23:1037-1046.
34. Kohal RJ, Wolkewitz M, Hinze M, Han J-S, Bächle M, Butz F. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants. An experiment in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:333-339.
35. Lee J, Sieweke JH, Rodriguez NA, etal. Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants: a study in rabbits. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36:610-617.
36. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Addis A, Schupbach P, Simion M. Surface modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:844-850.
37. Pirker W, Wiedemann D, Lidauer A, Kocher AA. Immediate, single stage, truly anatomic zirconia implant in lower molar replacement: a case report with 2.5 years follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 40:212-216.
38. Silva NR, Coelho PG, Fernandes CA, Navarro JM, Dias RA, Thompson VP. Reliability of one-piece ceramic implant. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 88:419-426.
39. Zhu J, Yang DW, Ma F. Feasibility study of a partially hollow configuration for zirconia dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:399-406.
40. Wenz HJ, Bartsch J, Wolfart S, Kern M. Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21:27-36.
41. Delgado-Ruíz RA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Moreno P, etal. Femtosecond laser microstructuring of zirconia dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2011; 96:91-100.
42. Valderrama P, Bornstein M, Jones AA, Wilson TG, Higginbottom FL, Cochran DL. Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs. J Periodontol 2011; 82:1025-1034.
43. Nelson K, Semper W, Hildebrand D, Ozyuvaci H. A retrospective analysis of sand-blasted, acid-etched implants with reduced healing times with an observation period of up to 5 years. J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23:726-732.
44. Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Zafiropoulos G, Andreana S. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27:352-358.
45. Saulacic N, Bosshardt D, Bornstein M, Berner S, Buser D. Bone apposition to a titanium-zirconium alloy implant, as compared to two other titanium-containing implants. Eur Cell Mater 2012; 23:273-288.
46. Gahlert M, Roehling S, Sprecher CM, Kniha H, Milz S, Bormann K. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomophometric study in mini pig maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:281-286.
47. Bianchi AE, Bosetti M, Dolci G, Sberna MT, Sanfilippo F, Cannas M. In vitro and in vivo follow-up of titanium transmucosal implants with a zirconia collar. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2004; 2:143-150.
48. Heijdenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, van der Reijden WA. Feasibility and influence of the microgap of two implants placed in a non-submerged procedure: a five-year follow-up clinical trial. J Periodontol 2006; 77:1051-1060.
49. Akagawa Y, Hosokawa R, Sato Y, Kamayama K. Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years' function in monkeys: A clinical and histologic study. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:551-558.
50. Stadlinger B, Hennig M, Eckelt E, Kunlisch E, Mai R. Comparison of zirconia and titanium implants after a short healing period. A pilot study in minipigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39:585-592.
51. Turner AS. Animal models of osteoporosis. Necessity and limitations. Eur Cells Mater 2001; 1:66-81.
52. Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone. Eur Cells Mater 2007; 13:1-10.
53. Gottlow J, Dard M, Kjellson F, Obrecht M, Sennerby L. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconia implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the minipig. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:538-545.
54. Gahlert M, Rohling S, Wieland M, Sprecher CM, Kniha H, Milz S. Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants: a histological and histomorphometrical study in the maxilla of pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:1247-1253.
55. Schliephake H, Hefti T, Schlottig F, Gédet P, Staedt H. Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37:818-828.
56. Zinelis S, Thomas A, Syres K, Silikas N, Eliades G. Surface characterization of zirconia dental implants. Dent Mater 2010; 26:295-305.