Dementia research and advance consent: It is not about critical interests

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 708-709

  Jongsma, Karin Rolanda ^a   van de Vathorst, Suzanne ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMENTIA; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LIVING WILL; PSYCHOLOGY; TERMINAL CARE;

ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; DEMENTIA; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; TERMINAL CARE;

EID: 84938522417     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: 14734257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102445     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Buller T. Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research. J Med Ethics 2015;41:701-7.
2. The Nuremberg Code. Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Vol 2. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949:181-2.
3. Belmont Report. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. 1979. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html (accessed 19 Aug 2014).
4. Vollmann J. Advance directives in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Med Health Care Philos 2001;4:161-7.
5. Berghmans RLP. Advance Directives and Dementia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000;913:105-10.
6. Cantor N. Advance directives and the pursuit of death with dignity. Indiana University Press, 1993:25-7.
7. Jongsma K, van de Vathorst S. Advance directives in dementia research: the opinions and arguments of clinical researchers-an empirical study. Res Ethics 2015;11:4-14.