Grass buffer strips benefit invertebrate and breeding skylark numbers in a heterogeneous agricultural landscape

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 181, Issue , 2013, Pages 101-107

  Josefsson, Jonas ^a   Berg, Åke ^a   Hiron, Matthew ^a   Pärt, Tomas ^a   Eggers, Sönke ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Agri environment schemes; Agricultural intensification; Conservation management; Farmland birds; Invertebrates; Non crop habitat

Indexed keywords

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION; AGRICULTURAL LAND; BIODIVERSITY; BUFFER ZONE; CEREAL; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; FOOD SUPPLY; GRASS; INVERTEBRATE; PASSERINE; REFUGE; RUNOFF; SEASONALITY; SMALL MAMMAL; SURFACE WATER; SWARD;

SWEDEN;

ALAUDA; ARACHNIDA; ARANEAE; AVES; COLEOPTERA; INVERTEBRATA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 84938482926     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.018     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Barker A.M., Reynolds C.J.M. The value of planted grass field margins as a habitat for sawflies and other chick-food insects. Aspects of Applied Biology 1999, 54:109-116.
2. Barton K. MuMIn. Multi-model Inference. R-package, Version 1.7.7 2010, Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn.
3. Benton T.G., Vickery J.A., Wilson J.D. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution 2003, 18(4):182-188.
4. Berg Å., Pärt T. Abundance of breeding farmland birds on arable and set-aside fields at forest edges. Ecography 1994, 17(2):147-152.
5. Bianchi F.J.J.A., Booij C.J.H., Tscharntke T. Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2006, 273(1595):1715-1727.
6. Blake R.J., Woodcock B.A., Westbury D.B., Sutton P., Potts S.G. Novel management to enhance spider biodiversity in existing grass buffer strips. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2013, 15(1):77-85.
7. Bonthoux S., Balent G. Point count duration: five minutes are usually sufficient to model the distribution of bird species and to study the structure of communities for a French landscape. Journal of Ornithology 2011, 153(2):491-504.
8. Burnham K.P., Andersson D.R. Model Selection and Multi-model Inference a Practical Information Theoretical Approach 2002, Springer, NY.
9. Butler S.J., Vickery J.A., Norris K. Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture. Science 2007, 315:381-384.
10. Chalfoun A.D., Martin T.E. Assessments of habitat preferences and quality depend on spatial scale and metrics of fitness. Journal of Applied Ecology 2007, 44:983-992.
11. Chalfoun A.D., Martin T.E. Habitat structure mediates predation risk for sedentary prey: experimental tests of alternative hypotheses. Journal of Animal Ecology 2009, 78:497-503.
12. Chamberlain D.E., Vickery J.A., Gough S. Spatial and temporal distribution of breeding skylarks Alauda arvensis in relation to crop type in periods of population increase and decrease. Ardea 2000, 88(1):61-73.
13. Chamberlain D.E., Fuller R.J., Bunce R.G.H., Duckworth J.C., Shrubb M. Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. Journal of Applied Ecology 2000, 37(5):771-788.
14. Conover R.R., Burger L.W., Linder E.T. Breeding bird response to field border presence and width. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 2009, 121(3):548-555.
15. Copland A.S., Crowe O., Wilson M.W., O'Halloran J. Habitat associations of Eurasian Skylarks Alauda arvensis breeding on Irish farmland and implications for agri-environment planning. Bird Study 2012, 59:155-165.
16. Donald P.F., Green R.E., Heath M.F. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2001, 268(1462):25-29.
17. Donald P.F. The Skylark 2004, T. and A.D. Poyser, London.
18. Douglas D.J.T., Vickery J.A., Benton T.G. Improving the value of field margins as foraging habitat for farmland birds. Journal of Applied Ecology 2009, 46(2):353-362.
19. Douglas D.J.T., Vickery J.A., Benton T.G. Variation in arthropod abundance in barley under varying sowing regimes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2010, 135(1-2):127-131.
20. Eggers S., Griesser M., Andersson T., Ekman J. Nest predation and habitat change interact to influence Siberian jay numbers. Oikos 2005, 111:150-158.
21. Eggers S., Griesser M., Nystrand M., Ekman J. Predation risk induces changes in nest-site selection and clutch size in the Siberian jay. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2006, 273(1587):701-706.
22. Eggers S., Unell M., Pärt T. Autumn-sowing of cereals reduces breeding bird numbers in a heterogeneous agricultural landscape. Biological Conservation 2011, 144(3):1137-1144.
23. Eraud C., Boutin J.-M. Density and productivity of breeding Skylarks Alauda arvensis in relation to crop type on agricultural lands in western France: small field size and the maintenance of set-aside and lucerne are important to ensure high breeding pair densities and productivity. Bird Study 2002, 49:287-296.
24. Evans K.L. The potential for interactions between predation and habitat change to cause population declines of farmland birds. Ibis 2004, 146:1-13.
25. Fuller R.J., Gregory R.D., Gibbons D.W., Marchant J.H., Wilson J.D., Baillie S.R., Carter N. Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain. Conservation Biology 1995, 9(6):1425-1441.
26. Geiger F., Bengtsson J., Berendse F., Weisser W.W., Emmerson M., Morales M.B., Ceryngier P., Liira J., Tscharntke T., Winqvist C., Eggers S., Bommarco R., Pärt T., Bretagnolle V., Plantegenest M., Clement L.W., Dennis C., Palmer C., Onate J.J., Guerrero I., Hawro V., Aavik T., Thies C., Flohre A., Hanke S., Fischer C., Goedhart P.W., Inchausti P. Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic and Applied Ecology 2010, 11(2):97-105.
27. Guerrero I., Morales M.B., Oñate J.J., Geiger F., Berendse F., de Snoo G., Eggers S., Pärt T., Bengtsson J., Clement L.W., Weisser W.W., Olszewski A., Ceryngier P., Hawro V., Liira J., Dennis C., Emmerson M., Fischer C., Flohre A., Thies C., Tscharntke T. Response of ground-nesting farmland birds to agricultural intensification across Europe: landscape and field level management factors. Biological Conservation 2012, 152:74-80.
28. Hiron M., Berg Å., Pärt T. Do skylarks prefer autumn sown cereals? Effects of agricultural land use, region and time in the breeding season on density. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2012, 150:82-90.
29. Hof A.R., Bright P.W. The impact of grassy field margins on macro-invertebrate abundance in adjacent arable fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2010, 139:280-283.
30. Holland J.M., Hutchison M.A.S., Smith B., Aebischer N.J. A review of invertebrates and seed-bearing plants as food for farmland birds in Europe. Annals of Applied Biology 2006, 148(1):49-71.
31. Kuiper M.W., Ottens H.J., Cenin L., Schaffers A.P., van Ruijven J., Koks B.J., Berendse F., de Snoo G.R. Field margins as foraging habitat for skylarks (Alauda arvensis) in the breeding season. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2013, 170:10-15.
32. Lima S.L., Dill L.M. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 2013, 68(4):619-640.
33. Low M., Arlt D., Eggers S., Pärt T. Habitat-specific differences in adult survival rates and its links to parental workload and on-nest predation. Journal of Animal Ecology 2010, 79(1):214-224.
34. Marshall E.J.P., West T.M., Kleijn D. Impacts of an agri-environment field margin prescription on the flora and fauna of arable farmland in different landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2006, 113(1-4):36-44.
35. Marshall E.J.P., Moonen A.C. Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2002, 89:5-21.
36. Morris A.J., Holland J.M., Smith B., Jones N.E. Sustainable Arable Farming For an Improved Environment (SAFFIE): managing winter wheat sward structure for Skylarks Alauda avensis. Ibis 2004, 146:155-162.
37. Morris A.J., Gilroy J.J. Close to the edge: predation risks for two declining farmland passerines. Ibis 2008, 150:168-177.
38. Muscutt A.D., Harris G.L., Bailey S.W., Davies D.B. Buffer zones to improve water-quality - a review of their potential use in UK agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 1993, 45(1-2):59-77.
39. Perkins A.J., Whittingham M.J., Morris A.J., Bradbury R.B. Use of field margins by foraging yellowhammers Emberiza citrinella. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2002, 93(1):413-420.
40. Piha M., Pakkala T., Tiainen J. Habitat preferences of the Skylark Alauda arvensis in southern Finland. Ornis Fennica 2003, 80(3):97-110.
41. Potts G.R. The Partridge: Pesticides, Predation and Conservation 1986, Collins, London.
42. Poulsen J.G., Sotherton N.W., Aebischer N.J. Comparative nesting and feeding ecology of skylarks Alauda arvensis on arable farmland in southern England with special reference to set-aside. Journal of Applied Ecology 1998, 35:131-147.
43. Power A.G. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2010, 365(1554):2959-2971.
44. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2011, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN: 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org/.
45. Rabinowicz E. Redovisning av uppdrag om halvtidsutvärdering av Landsbygdsprogram för Sverige 2007-2013 2010, SLU, Department of Economics, Uppsala.
46. Saska P., Vodde M., Heijerman T., Westerman P., van der Werf W. The significance of a grassy field boundary for the spatial distribution of carabids within two cereal fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2007, 122:427-434.
47. Saska P., van der Werf W., Hemerik L., Luff M.L., Hatten T.D., Honek A. Temperature effects on pitfall catches of epigeal arthropods: a model and method for bias correction. Journal of Applied Ecology 2012, 50:181-189.
48. Schneider N., Low M., Arlt D., Pärt T. Contrast in edge vegetation structure modifies the predation risk of natural ground nests in an agricultural landscape. PLoS ONE 2012, 1-6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031517.
49. Smith H., Feber R.E., Johnson P.J., McCallum K., Plesner Jensen S., Younes M., Macdonald D.W. The Conservation Management of Arable Field Margins 1993, English Nature Science No. 18. English Nature.
50. Smith J., Potts S., Eggleton P. The value of sown grass margins for enhancing soil macrofaunal biodiversity in arable systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2008, 127:119-125.
51. Stoate C., Báldi A., Beja P., Boatman N.D., Herzon I., van Doorn A., de Snoo G.R., Rakosy L., Ramwell C. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe - a review. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 91(1):22-46.
52. Stoate C., Boatman N.D., Borralho R.J., Carvalho C.R., de Snoo G.R., Eden P. Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management 2001, 63(4):337-365.
53. Straub C.S., Finke D.L., Snyder W.E. Are the conservation of natural enemy biodiversity and biological control compatible goals?. Biological Control 2008, 45(2):225-237.
54. Suárez F., Garza V., Morales M.B. The role of extensive cereal crops, dry pasture and shrub-steppe in determining skylark Alauda arvensis densities in the Iberian peninsula. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2003, 95:551-557.
55. Söderström B., Pärt T., Rydén J. Different nest predator faunas and nest predation risk on ground and shrub nests at forest ecotones: an experiment and review. Oecologica 1998, 117:108-118.
56. Thomas C.F.G., Marshall E.J.P. Arthropod abundance and diversity in differently vegetated margins of arable fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 1999, 72(2):131-144.
57. Topping C.J., Sunderland K.D. Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat. Journal of Applied Ecology 1992, 29:485-491.
58. Uusi-Kämppä J., Jauhiainen L. Long-term monitoring of buffer zone efficiency under different cultivation techniques in boreal conditions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2010, 137(1):75-85.
59. Vought L.B.-M., Pinay G., Fuglsang A., Ruffinoni C. Structure and function of buffer strips from a water quality perspective in agricultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 1995, 31(1):323-331.
60. Vickery J.A., Fuller R.J. Use of Cereal Fields by Birds: A Review in Relation to Field Margin Managements 1998, BTO Research Report No. 195.
61. Vickery J.A., Carter N., Fuller R.J. The potential value of managed cereal field margins as foraging habitats for farmland birds in the UK. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2002, 89:41-52.
62. Watson M. Toxicological assessment of agricultural pesticides. Pesticide Residues in Food and Drinking Water: Human Exposure and Risks 2004, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK. D. Hamilton, S. Crossley (Eds.).
63. Weibel U. Habitat Use of Foraging Skylarks (Alauda arvensis) in an Arable Landscape with Wild Flower Strips 1998, vol. 64:37-45. Bulletin of the Geobotanical Institute ETH, Zürich.
64. Wilson J.D., Evans J., Browne S.J., King J.R. Territory distribution and breeding success of skylarks Alauda arvensis on organic and intensive farmland in southern England. Journal of Applied Ecology 1997, 34:1462-1478.
65. Woodcock B.A., Westbury D.B., Potts S.G., Harris S.J., Brown V.K. Establishing field margins to promote beetle conservation in arable farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2005, 107:255-266.
66. Wretenberg J., Lindström Å., Svensson S., Thierfelder T., Pärt T. Population trends of farmland birds in Sweden and England: similar trends but different patterns of agricultural intensification. Journal of Applied Ecology 2006, 42:1110-1120.