Genomic variation across landscapes: Insights and applications

New Phytologist

Volumn 207, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 953-967

  Bragg, Jason G ^a   Supple, Megan A ^a   Andrew, Rose L ^a,b   Borevitz, Justin O ^a,c  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Foundation species; Genome wide association studies (GWAS); Landscape genomics; Local adaptation; Non model organism; Selection scan

Indexed keywords

COLONIZATION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; LOCAL ADAPTATION;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS; PROCEDURES; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84938415123     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13410     Document Type: Review

References (136)

1. Aitken SN, Yeaman S, Holliday JA, Wang T, Curtis-McLane S. 2008. Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evolutionary Applications 1: 95-111.
2. Anderson JT, Lee C-R, Mitchell-Olds T. 2011. Life history QTLs and natural delection on flowering time in Boechera stricta, a perennial relative of arabidopsis. Evolution 65: 771-787.
3. Andrew RL, Rieseberg LH. 2013. Divergence is focused on few genomic regions early in speciation: incipient speciation of sunflower ecotypes. Evolution 67: 2468-2482.
4. Atwell S, Huang YS, Vilhjálmsson BJ, Willems G, Horton M, Li Y, Meng D, Platt A, Tarone AM, Hu TT et al. 2010. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 465: 627-631.
5. Barrett RDH, Hoekstra HE. 2011. Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level. Nature Reviews Genetics 12: 767-780.
6. Beaumont MA, Nichols RA. 1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 263: 1619-1626.
7. Birol I, Raymond A, Jackman SD, Pleasance S, Coope R, Taylor GA, Saint Yuen MM, Keeling CI, Brand D, Vandervalk BP et al. 2013. Assembling the 20 Gb white spruce (Picea glauca) genome from whole-genome shotgun sequencing data. Bioinformatics 29: 1492-1497.
8. Brachi B, Morris GP, Borevitz JO. 2011. Genome-wide association studies in plants: the missing heritability is in the field. Genome Biology 12: 232.
9. Bradburd GS, Ralph PL, Coop GM. 2013. Disentangling the effects of geographic and ecological isolation on genetic differentiation. Evolution 67: 3258-3273.
10. Broadhurst LM, Lowe A, Coates DJ, Cunningham SA, McDonald M, Vesk PA, Yates C. 2008. Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evolutionary Applications 1: 587-597.
11. Brown AHD, Matheson AC, Eldridge KG. 1975. Estimation of the mating system of Eucalyptus obliqua L'Herit. by using allozyme polymorphisms. Australian Journal of Botany 23: 931-949.
12. Brown GR, Gill GP, Kuntz RJ, Langley CH, Neale DB. 2004. Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in Loblolly pine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 15 255-15 260.
13. Byars SG, Parsons Y, Hoffmann AA. 2009. Effect of altitude on the genetic structure of an Alpine grass, Poa hiemata. Annals of Botany 103: 885-899.
14. Clegg MT, Allard RW. 1972. Patterns of genetic differentiation in the slender wild oat species Avena barbata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 69: 1820-1824.
15. Collard BCY, Mackill DJ. 2008. Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 557-572.
16. Coop G, Witonsky D, Di Rienzo A, Pritchard JK. 2010. Using environmental correlations to identify loci underlying local adaptation. Genetics 185: 1411-1423.
17. Dayton PK. 1972. Toward an understanding of community resilience and the potential effects of enrichments to the benthos at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. In: Parker BC, ed. Proceedings of the colloquium on conservation problems in Antarctica. Lawrence, KS, USA: Allen Press, 81-96.
18. De Carvalho D, Ingvarsson PK, Joseph J, Suter L, Sedivy C, Macaya-Sanz D, Cottrell J, Heinze B, Schanzer I, Lexer C et al. 2010. Admixture facilitates adaptation from standing variation in the European aspen (Populus tremula L.), a widespread forest tree. Molecular Ecology 19: 1638-1650.
19. De Kort H, Vandepitte K, Bruun HH, Closset-Kopp D, Honnay O, Mergeay J. 2014. Landscape genomics and a common garden trial reveal adaptive differentiation to temperature across Europe in the tree species Alnus glutinosa. Molecular Ecology 23: 4709-4721.
20. De Wit P, Pespeni MH, Ladner JT, Barshis DJ, Seneca F, Jaris H, Therkildsen NO, Morikawa M, Palumbi SR. 2012. The simple fool's guide to population genomics via RNA-Seq: an introduction to high-throughput sequencing data analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources 12: 1058-1067.
21. Dillon SK, McEvoy R, Baldwin DS, Rees GN, Parsons Y, Southerton S. 2014. Characterisation of adaptive genetic diversity in environmentally contrasted populations of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. (River Red Gum). PLoS ONE 9: e103515.
22. Dunlop M, Hilbert TW, Ferrier S, House A, Liedoff A, Prober SM, Smyth A, Martin TG, Harwood T, Williams KJ et al. 2012. The implications of climate change for biodiversity conservation and the national reserve system. Final synthesis. A report prepared for the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, and the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency. Canberra, ACT, Australia: CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship.
23. Dyer RJ, Nason JD, Garrick RC. 2010. Landscape modelling of gene flow: improved power using conditional genetic distance derived from the topology of population networks. Molecular Ecology 19: 3746-3759.
24. Eckert AJ, Bower AD, Wegrzyn JL, Pande B, Jermstad KD, Krutovsky KV, St Clair JB, Neale DB. 2009. Association genetics of coastal Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii, Pinaceae). I. Cold-hardiness related traits. Genetics 182: 1289-1302.
25. Eckert AJ, van Heerwaarden J, Wegrzyn JL, Nelson CD, Ross-Ibarra J, González-Martínez SC, Neale DB. 2010. Patterns of population structure and environmental associations to aridity across the range of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L., Pinaceae). Genetics 185: 969-982.
26. Edmands S. 2006. Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Molecular Ecology 16: 463-475.
27. Ellison AM, Bank MS, Clinton BD, Colburn EA, Elliott K, Ford CR, Foster DR, Kloeppel BD, Knoepp JD, Lovett GM et al. 2005. Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 479-486.
28. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, Mitchell SE. 2011. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6: e19379.
29. Evans LM, Slavov GT, Rodgers-Melnick E, Martin J, Ranjan P, Muchero W, Brunner AM, Schackwitz W, Gunter L, Chen J-G et al. 2014. Population genomics of Populus trichocarpa identifies signatures of selection and adaptive trait associations. Nature Genetics 46: 1089-1096.
30. Eveno E, Collada C, Guevara MA, Leger V, Soto A, Díaz L, Léger P, González-Martínez SC, Cervera MT, Plomion C et al. 2008. Contrasting patterns of selection at Pinus pinaster Ait. drought stress candidate genes as revealed by genetic differentiation analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 417-437.
31. th edn. Essex, UK: Pearson.
32. Fang Z, Gonzales AM, Clegg MT, Smith KP, Muehlbauer GJ, Steffenson BJ, Morrell PL. 2014. Two genomic regions contribute disproportionately to geographic differentiation in wild barley. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) 4: 1193-1203.
33. Fernandez CC, Shevock JR, Glazer AN, Thompson JN. 2006. Cryptic species within the cosmopolitan desiccation-tolerant moss Grimmia laevigata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 637-642.
34. Fischer MC, Rellstab C, Tedder A, Zoller S, Gugerli F, Shimizu KK, Holderegger R, Widmer A. 2013. Population genomic footprints of selection and associations with climate in natural populations of Arabidopsis halleri from the Alps. Molecular Ecology 22: 5594-5607.
35. Fitzpatrick MC, Keller SR. 2015. Ecological genomics meets community-level modelling of biodiversity: mapping the genomic landscape of current and future environmental adaptation. Ecology Letters 18: 1-16.
36. Foll M, Gaggiotti O. 2008. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180: 977-993.
37. Fournier-Level A, Korte A, Cooper MD, Nordborg M, Schmitt J, Wilczek AM. 2011. A map of local adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 334: 86-89.
38. Gapare WJ, Aitken SN. 2005. Strong spatial genetic structure in peripheral but not core populations of Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.]. Molecular Ecology 14: 2659-2667.
39. Gapare WJ, Aitken SN, Ritland CE. 2005. Genetic diversity of core and peripheral Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr] populations: implications for conservation of widespread species. Biological Conservation 123: 113-123.
40. Geraldes A, Farzaneh N, Grassa CJ, McKown AD, Guy RD, Mansfield SD, Douglas CJ, Cronk QCB. 2014. Landscape genomics of Populus trichocarpa; the role of hybridization, limited gene flow, and natural selection in shaping patterns of population structure. Evolution 68: 3260-3280.
41. Grattapaglia D, Vaillancourt RE, Shepherd M, Thumma BR, Foley W, Kulheim C, Potts BM, Myburg AA. 2012. Progress in Myrtaceae genetics and genomics: Eucalyptus as the pivotal genus. Tree Genetics and Genomes 8: 463-508.
42. Günther T, Coop G. 2013. Robust identification of local adaptation from allele frequencies. Genetics 195: 205-220.
43. Gur A, Zamir D. 2004. Unused natural variation can lift yield barriers in plant breeding. PLoS Biology 2: e245.
44. Hamann A, Wang TL. 2006. Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology 87: 2773-2786.
45. Hamilton JA, Lexer C, Aitken SN. 2013. Differential introgression reveals candidate genes for selection across a spruce (Picea sitchensis × P. glauca) hybrid zone. New Phytologist 197: 927-938.
46. Hancock AM, Brachi B, Faure N, Horton MW, Jarymowycz LB, Sperone FG, Toomajian C, Roux F, Bergelson J. 2011. Adaptation to climate across the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Science 334: 83-86.
47. Hancock AM, Witonsky DB, Gordon AS, Eshel G, Pritchard JK, Coop G, Di Rienzo A. 2008. Adaptations to climate in candidate genes for common metabolic disorders. PLoS Genetics 4: e32.
48. Harrison RG. 1986. Pattern and process in a narrow hybrid zone. Heredity 56: 337-349.
49. Hoffman JI, Simpson F, David P, Rijks JM, Kuiken T, Thorne MAS, Lacy RC, Dasmahapatra KK. 2014. High-throughput sequencing reveals inbreeding depression in a natural population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111: 3775-3780.
50. Holliday JA, Ritland K, Aitken SN. 2010b. Widespread, ecologically relevant genetic markers developed from association mapping of climate-related traits in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). New Phytologist 188: 501-514.
51. Holliday JA, Wang T, Aitken S. 2012. Predicting adaptive phenotypes from multilocus genotypes in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) using random forest. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) 2: 1085-1093.
52. Holliday JA, Yuen M, Ritland K, Aitken SN. 2010a. Postglacial history of a widespread conifer produces inverse clines in selective neutrality tests. Molecular Ecology 19: 3857-3864.
53. Huang P, Feldman M, Schroder S, Bahri BA, Diao X, Zhi H, Estep M, Baxter I, Devos KM, Kellogg EA. 2014. Population genetics of Setaria viridis, a new model system. Molecular Ecology 23: 4912-4925.
54. Huang X, Han B. 2014. Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 65: 531-551.
55. Huang X, Wei X, Sang T, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhao Y, Li C, Zhu C, Lu T, Zhang Z et al. 2010. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nature Genetics 42: 961-967.
56. Jones FC, Grabherr MG, Chan YF, Russell P, Mauceli E, Johnson J, Swofford R, Pirun M, Zody MC, White S et al. 2012. The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 484: 55-61.
57. Joost S, Bonin A, Bruford MW, Després L, Conord C, Erhardt G, Taberlet P. 2007. A spatial analysis method (SAM) to detect candidate loci for selection: towards a landscape genomics approach to adaptation. Molecular Ecology 16: 3955-3969.
58. Kane NC, King MG, Barker MS, Raduski A, Karrenberg S, Yatabe Y, Knapp SJ, Rieseberg LH. 2009. Comparative genomic and population genetic analyses indicate highly porous genomes and high levels of gene flow between divergent Helianthus species. Evolution 63: 2061-2075.
59. Kang HM, Sul JH, Service SK, Zaitlen NA, Kong SY, Freimer NB, Sabatti C, Eskin E. 2010. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics 42: 348-354.
60. Keller I, Wagner CE, Greuter L, Mwaiko S, Selz OM, Sivasundar A, Wittwer S, Seehausen O. 2013. Population genomic signatures of divergent adaptation, gene flow and hybrid speciation in the rapid radiation of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes. Molecular Ecology 22: 2848-2863.
61. Kooyers NJ, Greenlee AB, Colicchio JM, Oh M, Blackman BK. 2015. Replicate altitudinal clines reveal that evolutionary flexibility underlies adaptation to drought stress in annual Mimulus guttatus. New Phytologist 206: 152-165.
62. Lander ES, Schork NJ. 1994. Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 265: 2037-2048.
63. Langley CH, Stevens K, Cardeno C, Lee YC, Schrider DR, Pool JE, Langley SA, Suarez C, Corbett-Detig RB, Kolaczkowski B et al. 2012. Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 192: 533-598.
64. Lao O, Lu TT, Nothnagel M, Junge O, Freitag-Wolf S, Caliebe A, Balascakova M, Bertranpetit J, Bindoff LA, Comas D et al. 2008. Correlation between genetic and geographic structure in Europe. Current Biology 18: 1241-1248.
65. Lasky JR, Des Marais DL, Lowry DB, Povolotskaya I, McKay JK, Richards JH, Keitt TH, Juenger TE. 2014. Natural variation in abiotic stress responsive gene expression and local adaptation to climate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Biology and Evolution 31: 2283-2296.
66. Lasky JR, Des Marais DL, McKay JK, Richards JH, Juenger TE, Keitt TH. 2012. Characterizing genomic variation of Arabidopsis thaliana: the roles of geography and climate. Molecular Ecology 22: 5512-5529.
67. Lee C-R, Mitchell-Olds T. 2012. Environmental adaptation contributes to gene polymorphism across the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 3721-3728.
68. Lewontin RC, Krakauer J. 1973. Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms. Genetics 74: 175-195.
69. Lexer C, Heinze B, Alia R, Rieseberg LH. 2004. Hybrid zones as a tool for identifying adaptive genetic variation in outbreeding forest trees: lessons from wild annual sunflowers (Helianthus spp.). Forest Ecology and Management 197: 49-64.
70. Li Y, Cheng R, Spokas KA, Palmer AA, Borevitz JO. 2014. Genetic variation for life history sensitivity to seasonal warming in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 196: 569-577.
71. Li Y, Huang Y, Bergelson J, Nordborg M, Borevitz JO. 2010. Association mapping of local climate-sensitive Quantitative Trait Loci in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107: 21 199-21 204.
72. Lindtke D, Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Macaya-Sanz D, Lexer C. 2013. Admixture mapping of quantitative traits in Populus hybrid zones: power and limitations. Heredity 111: 474-485.
73. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, Warringer J, Parts L, James SA, Davey RP, Roberts IN, Burt A, Koufopanou V et al. 2009. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337-341.
74. Lowry DB, Hall MC, Salt DE, Willis JH. 2009. Genetic and physiological basis of adaptive salt tolerance divergence between coastal and inland Mimulus guttatus. New Phytologist 183: 776-788.
75. Luikart G, England PR, Tallmon D, Jordan D, Taberlet P. 2003. The power and promise of population genomics: from genotyping to genome typing. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 981-994.
76. Manel S, Holderegger R. 2013. Ten years of landscape genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 614-621.
77. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P. 2003. Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 189-197.
78. Mathieson I, McVean G. 2014. Demography and the age of rare variants. PLoS Genetics 10: e1004528.
79. McKay JK, Christian CE, Harrison S, Rice KJ. 2005. 'How local is local?'- A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restoration Ecology 13: 432-440.
80. McKinnon GE, Smith JJ, Potts BM. 2010. Recurrent nuclear DNA introgression accompanies chloroplast DNA exchange between two eucalypt species. Molecular Ecology 19: 1367-1380.
81. McLean EH, Prober SM, Stock WD, Steane DA, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE, Byrne M. 2014. Plasticity of functional traits varies clinally along a rainfall gradient in Eucalyptus tricarpa. Plant, Cell & Environment 37: 1440-1451.
82. Miller MR, Dunham JP, Amores A, Cresko WA, Johnson EA. 2007. Rapid and cost-effective polymorphism identification and genotyping using restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers. Genome Research 17: 240-248.
83. Morris GP, Ramu P, Deshpande SP, Hash CT, Shah T, Upadhyaya HD, Riera-Lizarazu O, Brown PJ, Acharya CB, Mitchell SE et al. 2013. Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 110: 453-458.
84. Myburg AA, Grattapaglia D, Tuskan GA, Hellsten U, Hayes RD, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Lindquist E, Tice H, Bauer D et al. 2014. The genome of Eucalyptus grandis. Nature 510: 356-362.
85. Naz AA, Arifuzzaman M, Muzammil S, Pillen K, Leon J. 2014. Wild barley introgression lines reveal novel QTL alleles for root and related shoot traits in the cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). BMC Genetics 15: 107.
86. Neale DB, Kremer A. 2011. Forest tree genomics: growing resources and applications. Nature Reviews Genetics 12: 111-122.
87. Neale DB, Langley CH, Salzberg SL, Wegrzyn JL. 2013. Open access to tree genomes: the path to a better forest. Genome Biology 14: 120.
88. Nemri A, Atwell S, Tarone AM, Huang YS, Zhao K, Studholme DJ, Nordborg M, Jones JDG. 2010. Genome-wide survey of Arabidopsis natural variation in downy mildew resistance using combined association and linkage mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107: 10 302-10 307.
89. Nordborg M, Weigel D. 2008. Next-generation genetics in plants. Nature 456: 720-723.
90. Novembre J, Stephens M. 2008. Interpreting principal component analyses of spatial genetic variation. Nature Genetics 40: 646-649.
91. Novembre J, Johnson T, Bryc K, Kutalik Z, Boyko AR, Auton A, Indap A, King KS, Bergmann S, Nelson MR et al. 2008. Genes mirror geography within Europe. Nature 456: 98-101.
92. Nystedt B, Street NR, Wetterbom A, Zuccolo A, Lin YC, Scofield DG, Vezzi F, Delhomme N, Giacomello S, Alexeyenko A et al. 2013. The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 497: 579-584.
93. Orsini L, Vanoverbeke J, Swillen I, Mergeay J, De Meester L. 2013. Drivers of population genetic differentiation in the wild: isolation by dispersal limitation, isolation by adaptation and isolation by colonization. Molecular Ecology 22: 5983-5999.
94. Pardo-Diaz C, Salazar C, Baxter SW, Merot C, Figueiredo-Ready W, Joron M, McMillan WO, Jiggins CD. 2012. Adaptive introgression across species boundaries in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Genetics 8: e1002752.
95. Pasaniuc B, Rohland N, McLaren PJ, Garimella K, Zaitlen N, Li H, Gupta N, Neale BM, Daly MJ, Sklar P et al. 2012. Extremely low-coverage sequencing and imputation increases power for genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics 44: 631-635.
96. Peter BM, Slatkin M. 2013. Detecting range expansions from genetic data. Evolution 67: 3274-3289.
97. Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. 2012. Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS ONE 7: e37135.
98. Platt A, Horton M, Huang YS, Li Y, Anastasio AE, Mulyati NW, Agren J, Bossdorf O, Byers D, Donohue K et al. 2010. The scale of population structure in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genetics 6: e1000843.
99. Pool JE, Corbett-Detig RB, Sugino RP, Stevens KA, Cardeno CM, Crepeau MW, Duchen P, Emerson JJ, Saelao P, Begun DJ et al. 2012. Population genomics of sub-Saharan Drosophila melanogaster: African diversity and non-African admixture. PLoS Genetics 8: e1003080.
100. Price AL, Helgason A, Palsson S, Stefansson H, St. Claire D, Andreassen OA, Kong A, Stefansson K. 2009. The impact of divergence time on the nature of population structure: an example from Iceland. PLoS Genetics 5: e1000505.
101. Price AL, Zaitien NA, Reich D, Patterson N. 2010. New approaches to population stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nature Reviews Genetics 11: 459-463.
102. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
103. Pyhäjärvi T, Hufford MB, Mezmouk S, Ross-Ibarra J. 2013. Complex patterns of local adaptation in teosinte. Genome Biology and Evolution 5: 1594-1609.
104. Ralph P, Coop G. 2010. Parallel adaptation: one or many waves of advance of an advantageous allele? Genetics 186: 647-668.
105. Rieseberg LH, Raymond O, Rosenthal DM, Lai Z, Livingstone K, Nakazato T, Durphy JL, Schwarzbach AE, Donovan LA, Lexer C. 2003. Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301: 1211-1216.
106. Roda F, Ambrose L, Walter GM, Liu HL, Schaul A, Lowe A, Pelser PB, Prentis P, Rieseberg LH, Ortiz-Barrientos D. 2013. Genomic evidence for the parallel evolution of coastal forms in the Senecio lautus complex. Molecular Ecology 22: 2941-2952.
107. Roesti M, Gavrilets S, Hendry AP, Salzburger W, Berner D. 2014. The genomic signature of parallel adaptation from shared genetic variation. Molecular Ecology 23: 3944-3956.
108. Sabeti PC, Reich DE, Higgins JM, Levine HZ, Richter DJ, Schaffner SF, Gabriel SB, Platko JV, Patterson NJ, McDonald GJ et al. 2002. Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419: 832-837.
109. Schauer N, Semel Y, Roessner U, Gur A, Balbo I, Carrari F, Pleban T, Perez-Melis A, Bruedigam C, Kopka J et al. 2006. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nature Biotechnology 24: 447-454.
110. Schoville SD, Bonin A, François O, Lobreaux S, Melodelima C, Manel S. 2012. Adaptive genetic variation on the landscape: methods and cases. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 43: 23-43.
111. Scotti-Saintagne C, Mariette S, Porth I, Goicoechea PG, Barreneche T, Bodénès C, Burg K, Kremer A. 2004. Genome scanning for interspecific differentiation between two closely related oak species [Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.]. Genetics 168: 1615-1626.
112. Sexton JP, Hangartner SB, Hoffmann AA. 2014. Genetic isolation by environment or distance: which pattern of gene flow Is most common? Evolution 68: 1-15.
113. Sexton JP, Strauss SY, Rice KJ. 2011. Gene flow increases fitness at the warm edge of a species' range. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108: 11 704-11 709.
114. Singhal S, Moritz C. 2013. Reproductive isolation between phylogeographic lineages scales with divergence. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280: 20132246.
115. Slatkin M. 1985. Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 393-430.
116. Slavov GT, DiFazio SP, Martin J, Schackwitz W, Muchero W, Rodgers-Melnick E, Lipphardt MF, Pennacchio CP, Hellsten U, Pennacchio L et al. 2012. Genome resequencing reveals multiscale geographic structure and extensive linkage disequilibrium in the forest tree Populus trichocarpa. New Phytologist 196: 713-725.
117. Smouse PE, Peakall R. 1999. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 82: 561-573.
118. Sork VL, Aitken SN, Dyer RJ, Eckert AJ, Legendre P, Neale DB. 2013. Putting the landscape into the genomics of forest trees: approaches for understanding local adaptation and population responses to changing climate. Tree Genetics and Genomics 9: 901-911.
119. Steane DA, Potts BM, McLean E, Prober SM, Stock WD, Vaillancourt RE, Byrne M. 2014. Genome-wide scans detect adaptation to aridity in a widespread forest tree species. Molecular Ecology 23: 2500-2513.
120. The Heliconius Genome Consortium. 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487: 94-98.
121. Turner TL, Bourne EC, Von Wettberg EJ, Hu TT, Nuzhdin SV. 2010. Population resequencing reveals local adaptation of Arabidopsis lyrata to serpentine soils. Nature Genetics 42: 260-263.
122. Tuskan GA, Difazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov A et al. 2006. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313: 1596-1604.
123. Vitti JJ, Grossman SR, Sabeti PC. 2013. Detecting natural selection in genomic data. Annual Review of Genetics 47: 97-120.
124. Wang BS, Mao JF, Gao J, Zhao W, Wang XR. 2011. Colonization of the Tibetan Plateau by the homoploid hybrid pine Pinus densata. Molecular Ecology 20: 3796-3811.
125. Weetman D, Wilding CS, Steen K, Pinto J, Donnelly MJ. 2012. Gene flow-dependent genomic divergence between Anopheles gambiae M and S forms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 279-291.
126. Wegrzyn JL, Liechty JD, Stevens KA, Wu LS, Loopstra CA, Vasquez-Gross HA, Dougherty WM, Lin BY, Zieve JJ, Martínez-García PJ et al. 2014. Unique features of the loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) megagenome revealed through sequence annotation. Genetics 196: 891-909.
127. Weigel D, Mott R. 2009. The 1001 genomes project for Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biology 10: 107.
128. Williams AV, Nevill PG, Krauss SL. 2014. Next generation restoration genetics: applications and opportunities. Trends in Plant Science 19: 529-537.
129. ST do not necessarily require large sample sizes when using many SNP markers. PLoS ONE 7: e42649.
130. Winkler CA, Nelson GW, Smith MW. 2010. Admixture mapping comes of age. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 11: 65-89.
131. Wright S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-157.
132. Wright S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.
133. Yang W-Y, Novembre J, Eskin E, Halperin E. 2012. A model-based approach for analysis of spatial structure in genetic data. Nature Genetics 44: 725-731.
134. Yoder JB, Stanton-Geddes J, Zhou P, Briskine R, Young ND, Tiffin P. 2014. Genomic signature of local adaptation to climate in Medicago truncatula. Genetics 196: 1263-1275.
135. Yu J, Holland JB, McMullen MD, Buckler ES. 2008. Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 178: 539-551.
136. Zimin A, Stevens KA, Crepeau MW, Holtz-Morris A, Koriabine M, Marçais G, Puiu D, Roberts M, Wegrzyn JL, de Jong PJ et al. 2014. Sequencing and assembly of the 22-Gb Loblolly pine genome. Genetics 196: 875-890.