Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling With Cross-Loadings and Residual Covariances: Comments on Stromeyer et al.

Journal of Management

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1561-1577

  Asparouhov, Tihomir ^a   Muthén, Bengt ^a   Morin, Alexandre J S ^b  

^a Muthén Muthén   (United States)

^b AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bayesian methods; macro topics; measure development; psychometrics; research methods; statistical methods; structural equation modeling (SEM)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938391668     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: 15571211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0149206315591075     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. T.AsparouhovB.Muthén2009. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16: 397-438.
2. H.W.MarshO.LüdtkeB.MuthénT.AsparouhovA.J.S.MorinU.TrautweinB.Nagengast2010. A new look at the Big-Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22: 471-491.
3. H.W.MarshO.LüdtkeB.NagengastA.J.S.MorinM.Von Davier2013. Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right. Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18: 257-284.
4. H.W.MarshA.J.S.MorinP.D.ParkerG.Kaur2014. Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10: 85-110.
5. H.W.MarshB.MuthénA.AsparouhovO.LüdtkeA.RobitzschA.J.S.MorinU.Trautwein2009. Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16: 439-476.
6. J.E.McGeeM.PetersonS.L.MuellerJ.M.Sequeira2009. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33: 965-988.
7. A.J.S.MorinA.K.ArensH.W.Marsh in press. A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling.
8. B.MuthénT.Asparouhov2012. Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17: 313-335.
9. D.A.SassT.A.Schmitt2010. A comparative investigation of rotation criteria within exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45: 73-103.
10. T.A.SchmittD.A.Sass2011. Rotation criteria and hypothesis testing for exploratory factor analysis: Implications for factor pattern loadings and interfactor correlations. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 71: 95-113.
11. G.Schwarz1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6: 461-464.
12. W.R.StromeyerJ.W.MillerR.SriramachandramurthyR.DeMartino2015. The prowess and pitfalls of Bayesian structural equation modeling: Important considerations for management research. Journal of Management, 41: 491-520.
13. L.L.Thurstone1947. Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago.
14. M.J.ZyphurF.L.Oswald2015. Bayesian estimation and inference: A user’s guide. Journal of Management, 41: 390-420.