Global supply chain of arable land use: Production-based and consumption-based trade imbalance

Land Use Policy

Volumn 49, Issue , 2015, Pages 118-130

  Chen, G Q ^a,b   Han, M Y ^a,b  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Arable land use; Food supply; Global supply chain; Input output analysis; Trade imbalance

Indexed keywords

ARABLE LAND; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; FOOD SUPPLY; GLOBAL TRADE; LAND USE; TRADE FLOW;

CANADA; CHINA; JAPAN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84938350439     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.023     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Antonelli M., Siciliano G., Turvani M.E., Rulli M.C. Global investments in agricultural land and the role of the EU: drivers, scope and potential impacts. Land Use Policy 2015, 47:98-111.
2. Chen G.Q., Han M.Y. Virtual land use change in China 2002-2010: internal transition and trade imbalance. Land Use Policy 2015, 47:55-65.
3. Chen Z.M., Chen G.Q. An overview of energy consumption of the globalized world economy. Energy Policy 2011, 39:5920-5928.
4. Chen Z.M., Chen G.Q. Embodied carbon dioxide emission at supra-national scale: a coalition analysis for G7, BRIC, and the rest of the world. Energy Policy 2011, 39:2899-2909.
5. Chen Z.M., Chen G.Q. Demand-driven energy requirement of world economy 2007: a multi-region input-output network simulation. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2007, 18:1757-1774.
6. Chen Z.M., Chen G.Q. Virtual water accounting for the globalized world economy: national water footprint and international virtual water trade. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 28:142-149.
7. Chen Z.M., Chen G.Q., Chen B. Embodied carbon dioxide emission by the globalized economy: a systems ecological input-output simulation. J. Environ. Inf. 2013, 21(1):35-44.
8. Davis S.J., Caldeira K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107:5687-5692.
9. FAO, 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org/home/en/.
10. Garrett R.D., Lambin E.F., Naylor R.L. Land institutions and supply chain configurations as determinants of soybean planted area and yields in Brazil. Land Use Policy 2013, 31:385-396.
11. Garrett R.D., Lambin E.F., Naylor R.L. The new economic geography of land use change: Supply chain configurations and land use in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 2013, 34:265-275.
12. Gerbens-Leenes P.W., Nonhebel S., Ivens W.P.M.F. A method to determine land requirements relating to food consumption patterns. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 90:47-58.
13. Guo S., Shen G.Q., Chen Z.M., Yu R. 2014. Embodied cultivated land use in China 1987-2007. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 47:198-209.
14. Han M.Y., Chen G.Q., Mustafa M.T., Hayat T., Shao L., Li J.S., Xia X.H., Ji X. Embodied water for urban economy: a three-scale input-output analysis for Beijing 2010. Ecol. Model. 2015, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.024.
15. Han M.Y., Guo S., Chen H., Ji X., Li J.S. Local-scale systems input-output analysis of embodied water for the Beijing economy in 2007. Front. Earth Sci. 2014, 8:414-426.
16. Headey D. Rethinking the global food crisis: the role of trade shocks. Food Policy 2011, 36:136-146.
17. Hubacek K., Sun L. A scenario analysis of China's land use and land cover change: incorporating biophysical information into input?output modeling. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dynam. 2001, 12:367-397.
18. Johnson, R.C., Noguera, G., 2011. Accounting for intermediates: production sharing and trade in value added. http://www.freit.org/WorkingPapers/Papers/TradePatterns/FREIT063pdf.
19. Kastner T., Ibarrola Rivas M.J., Koch W., Nonhebel S. Global changes in diets and the consequences for land requirements for food. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109:6868-6872.
20. Kastner T., Kastner M., Nonhebel S. Tracing distant environmental impacts of agricultural products from a consumer perspective. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70:1032-1040.
21. Kastner T., Nonhebel S. Changes in land requirements for food in the Philippines: a historical analysis. Land Use Policy 2010, 27.
22. Kongsager R., Reenberg A. Contemporary land-use transitions: the global oil palm expansion. GLP Report No. 4 2012, GLP-IPO, Copenhagen.
23. Krzywinski M., Schein J., Birol I., Connors J., Gascoyne R., Horsman D., Jones S.J., Marra M.A. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome. Res. 2009, 19:1639-1645.
24. Lenzen M., Borgstrom Hansson C., Bond S. On the bioproductivity and land-disturbance metrics of the ecological footprint. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61:6-10.
25. Lenzen M., Kanemoto K., Moran D., Geschke A. Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:8374-8381.
26. Lenzen M., Moran D., Bhaduri A., Kanemoto K., Bekchanov M., Geschke A., Foran B. International trade of scarce water. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 94:78-85.
27. Lenzen M., Moran D., Kanemoto K., Geschke A. Building eora: a global multi-regional input-output database at high country and sector resolution. Econ. Syst. Res. 2013, 25:20-49.
28. Lenzen M., Murray S.A., Korte B., Dey C.J. Environmental impact assessment including indirect effects: a case study using input-output analysis. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2003, 23:263-282.
29. Leontief W. Input-output Economics 1986, Oxford University Press, New York.
30. Liu Y., Fang F., Li Y. Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making. Land Use Policy 2014, 40:6-12.
31. Long H. Land use policy in China: introduction. Land use policy 2014, 40:1-5.
32. Lopes L.F.G., dos Santos Bento J.M.R., Arede Correia Cristovão A.F., Baptista F.O. Exploring the effect of land use on ecosystem services: The distributive issues. Land Use Policy 2015, 45:141-149.
33. Miroudot S., Lanz R., Ragoussis A. Trade in intermediate goods and services 2009, http://www.oecd.org/trade.
34. Perali F., Pieroni L., Standardi G. World tariff liberalization in agriculture: an assessment using a global CGE trade model for EU15. J. Policy Model. 2012, 34:155-180.
35. Peters G.P., Hertwich E.G. CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:1401-1407.
36. Qiang W.L., Liu A.M., Cheng S.K., Kastner T., Xie G.D. Agricultural trade and virtual land use: the case of China's crop trade. Land Use Policy 2013, 33:141-150.
37. Song W. Decoupling cultivated land loss by construction occupation from economic growth in Beijing. Habitat Int. 2014, 43:198-205.
38. Steen-Olsen K., Weinzettel J., Cranston G., Ercin A.E., Hertwich E.G. Carbon, land, and water footpriont accounts for the European Union: consumption, production, and displacements through international trade. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:10883-10891.
39. Tan M., Li X., Xie H., Lu C. Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China-a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Land Use Policy 2005, 22:187-196.
40. The State Department of the People's Republic of China The 11th Five-Year Plan (2006-2010) 2006, The People's Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese).
41. The United States Department of Agriculture, 2015. http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome.
42. Tilman D., Balzer C., Hill J., Befort B.L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108:20260-20264.
43. Verhoeve A., Dewaelheyns V., Kerselaers E., Rogge E., Gulinck H. Virtual farmland: grasping the occupation of agricultural land by non-agricultural land uses. Land Use Policy 2015, 42:547-556.
44. Weinzettel J., Hertwich E.G., Peters G.P., Steen-Olsen K., Galli A. Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Global Environ. Change 2013, 23:433-438.
45. Wiedmann T., Lenzen M., Turner K., Barrett J. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities-Part 2: Review of input?output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61:15-26.
46. Wood R., Lenzen M., Dey C., Lundie S. A comparative study of some environmental impacts of conventional and organic farming in Australia. Agric. Syst. 2006, 89:324-348.
47. Yu Y., Feng K., Hubacek K. Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Global Environ. Change 2013, 23:1178-1186.