Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: Practice patterns and short-term outcomes among 7061 patients

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 262, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 372-377

  Abdelgadir Adam, Mohamed ^a   Choudhury, Kingshuk ^b   Dinan, Michaela A ^c   Reed, Shelby D ^c   Scheri, Randall P ^a   Blazer, Dan G ^a   Roman, Sanziana A ^a   Sosa, Julie A ^a,c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

NCDB, outcomes; pancreaticoduodenectomy; robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy; survival

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMORBIDITY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORTALITY; NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; STATISTICS; SURGICAL PATIENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HOSPITALIZATION; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PATHOLOGY; RISK; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84938263418     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001055     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Whipple AO,. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for islet carcinoma: a five-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 1945; 121: 847-852
2. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 10-15
3. Hyder O, Dodson RM, Nathan H, Influence of patient, physician, and hospital factors on 30-day readmission following pancreatoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg. 2013; 148: 1095-1102
4. Gagner M, Pomp A,. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994; 8: 408-410
5. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA,. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 215: 810-819
6. Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205: 222-230
7. Kendrick ML, Cusati D,. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg. 2010; 145: 19-23
8. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 2050-2059
9. Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Noguchi K, A meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-Assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010; 14: 958-964
10. Vanounou T, Steel JL, Nguyen KT, Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 998-1009
11. Gagner M, Palermo M,. Laparoscopic Whipple procedure: review of the literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009; 16: 726-730
12. Zureikat AH, Breaux JA, Steel JL, Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented? J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15: 1151-1157
13. Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 1998; 228: 429-438
14. American College of Surgeons: Cancer Programs. Cancer data and statistics. Available at: http://www.facs.org/cancer/publicncdb.html. Accessed June 29, 2014
15. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA,. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45: 613-619
16. Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 2013; 258: 554-559; discussion 559-562
17. Kendrick ML, Sclabas GM,. Major venous resection during total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB. 2011; 13: 454-458
18. Langan RC, Graham JA, Chin AB, Laparoscopic-Assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: early favorable physical quality-of-life measures. Surgery. 2014; 156: 379-384
19. Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg. 2014; 260: 633-640
20. Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM,. Laparoscopic robotic-Assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26: 2397-2402
21. Speicher PJ, Nussbaum DP, White RR, Defining the learning curve for team-based laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy [published online ahead of print June 13, 2014]. Ann Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3839-7
22. Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg. 2001; 234: 549-558; discussion 558-549
23. Meyers WC, Branum GD, Farouk M, A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324: 1073-1078