Detection of inflammatory sacroiliitis in children with magnetic resonance imaging: Is gadolinium contrast enhancement necessary?

Arthritis and Rheumatology

Volumn 67, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 2250-2256

  Weiss, Pamela F ^a   Xiao, Rui ^b   Biko, David M ^a   Johnson, Ann M ^a   Chauvin, Nancy A ^a  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW EDEMA; CHILD; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ENTHESITIS; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGIST; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACROILIITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPONDYLARTHRITIS; SYNOVITIS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPONDYLARTHROPATHIES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SACROILIITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPONDYLARTHROPATHIES; SYNOVITIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84938153003     PISSN: 23265191     EISSN: 23265205     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/art.39159     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, et al., The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68 Suppl 2: ii1-44.
2. Maksymowicz H, Kowalewski K, Lubkowska K, Zolud W, Sasiadek M,. Diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of active sacroiliitis in seronegative spondyloarthropathy. Pol J Radiol 2010; 75: 58-65.
3. De Hooge M, van den Berg R, Navarro-Compan V, van Gaalen F, van der Heijde D, Huizinga T, et al., Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints in the early detection of spondyloarthritis: no added value of gadolinium compared with short tau inversion recovery sequence. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013; 52: 1220-4.
4. Tuite MJ., Sacroiliac joint imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2008; 12: 72-82.
5. Puhakka KB, Jurik AG, Egund N, Schiottz-Christensen B, Stengaard-Pedersen K, van Overeem Hansen G, et al., Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Assessment of abnormalities by MR in comparison with radiography and CT. Acta Radiol 2003; 44: 218-29.
6. Rudwaleit M, Jurik AG, Hermann KG, Landewe R, van der Heijde D, Baraliakos X, et al., Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 1520-7.
7. Navallas M, Ares J, Beltran B, Lisbona MP, Maymo J, Solano A., Sacroiliitis associated with axial spondyloarthropathy: new concepts and latest trends. Radiographics 2013; 33: 933-56.
8. Madsen KB, Egund N, Jurik AG., Grading of inflammatory disease activity in the sacroiliac joints with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between short-tau inversion recovery and gadolinium contrast-enhanced sequences. J Rheumatol 2010; 37: 393-400.
9. Humphrey GB, Boon CM, van Linden van den Heuvell GF, van de Wiel HB., The occurrence of high levels of acute behavioral distress in children and adolescents undergoing routine venipunctures. Pediatrics 1992; 90: 87-91.
10. Cummings EA, Reid GJ, Finley GA, McGrath PJ, Ritchie JA., Prevalence and source of pain in pediatric inpatients. Pain 1996; 68: 25-31.
11. Polkki T, Pietila AM, Rissanen L., Pain in children: qualitative research of Finnish school-aged children's experiences of pain in hospital. Int J Nurs Pract 1999; 5: 21-8.
12. Cowper SE, Robin HS, Steinberg SM, Su LD, Gupta S, LeBoit PE., Scleromyxoedema-like cutaneous diseases in renal-dialysis patients. Lancet 2000; 356: 1000-1.
13. Cowper SE, Su LD, Bhawan J, Robin HS, LeBoit PE., Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy. Am J Dermatopathol 2001; 23: 383-93.
14. Ting WW, Stone MS, Madison KC, Kurtz K., Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy with systemic involvement. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139: 903-6.
15. LeBoit PE., What nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy might be. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139: 928-30.
16. Thomsen HS, Morcos SK., Contrast media and the kidney: European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines. Br J Radiol 2003; 76: 513-8.
17. Puhakka KB, Melsen F, Jurik AG, Boel LW, Vesterby A, Egund N., MR imaging of the normal sacroiliac joint with correlation to histology. Skeletal Radiol 2004; 33: 15-28.
18. Fleiss JL., Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bull 1971; 76: 378-82.
19. Landis JR, Koch GG., The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-74.
20. Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, Baum J, Glass DN, Goldenberg J, et al., International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 390-2.
21. Dougados M, van der Linden S, Juhlin R, Huitfeldt B, Amor B, Calin A, et al, and the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group. The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34: 1218-27.
22. Lin C, MacKenzie JD, Courtier JL, Gu JT, Milojevic D., Magnetic resonance imaging findings in juvenile spondyloarthropathy and effects of treatment observed on subsequent imaging. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2014; 12: 25.