Visual Argumentation: A Further Reappraisal

Argumentation Library

Volumn 22, Issue , 2012, Pages 273-288

  Roque, Georges ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b ÉCOLE DES HAUTES ÉTUDES EN SCIENCES SOCIALES   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation Theory; Pragmatic Argument; Strategic Maneuvering; Visual Channel; Visual Code

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938098820     PISSN: 15667650     EISSN: 22151907     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_18     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Adam, J.-M., & Bonhomme, M. (2005). L’Argumentation publicitaire: Rhétorique de l’éloge et de la persuasion. Paris: Armand Colin.
2. Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.
3. Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L. (1996). Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33(1), 1–10.
4. Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L. (2006). Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 103–113.
5. Blair, T. (1996). The possibility and actuality of visual arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33(1), 23–39.
6. Blair, T. (2004). The rhetoric of visual arguments. In C. A. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 41–61). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Chabrol, C., & Radu, M. (2008). Psychologie de la communication et persuasion: Théories et applications. Brussels: De Boeck.
8. Ducrot, O., et al. (1980). Les mots du discours. Paris: Minuit.
9. Gombrich, E. (1982). The image and the eye: Further studies in the psychology of pictorial representation . Oxford: Phaidon.
10. Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
11. Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, art and argument. Informal Logic, 18, 105–129.
12. Groarke, L. (2002). Toward a pragma-dialectics of visual argument. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 137–151). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
13. Groarke, L., & Tindale, C. W. (2008). Good reasoning matters!: A constructive approach to critical thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Groupe µ. (1992). Traité du signe visuel: Pour une rhétorique de l’image. Paris: Seuil.
15. Jakobson, R. (1971). Quest for the essence of language. In R. Jakobson & S. Rudy (Eds.), Selected writings: Words and language (Vol. 2, pp. 345–359). The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
16. Klinkenberg, J.-M. (2000). Précis de sémiotique générale. Paris: Seuil.
17. Kostelnick, C. (2004). Melting-pot ideology, modernist aesthetics, and the emergence of graphical conventions: The statistical atlases of the United States, 1874-1925. In C. A. Hill & M. Helmers (Eds.), Defining visual rhetorics (pp. 215–242). Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum.
18. Nettel, A.-L. (2005). The power of image and the image of power: The case of law. Word and Image, 21(2), 137–150.
19. Nettel, A.-L., & Roque, G. (2012). Persuasive argumentation vs. manipulation. Argumentation, 26(1), 55–69.
20. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1970). Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Brussels: Edition de l’Institut de Sociologie Université Libre de Bruxelles.
21. Roque, G. (2004). Prolégomènes à l’analyse de l’argumentation visuelle. In E. C. Oliveira (Ed.), Chaïm Perelman. Direito, Retórica e Teoria da Argumentação (pp. 95–114). Feira de Santana: Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana.
22. Roque, G. (2008). Political rhetoric in visual images. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Dialogue and rhetoric (pp. 185–193). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
23. Roque, G. (2010). What is visual in visual argumentation? In J. Ritola (Ed.), Arguments cultures. Proceedings of OSSA 09 (pp. 1–9) [CD-ROM]. Ontario: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, University of Windsor.
24. Roque, G. (2011). Rhétorique visuelle et argumentation visuelle. Semen, 32, 91–106.
25. Smith, V. J. (2007). Aristotle’s classical enthymeme and the visual argumentation of the twenty-first century. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 114–123.
26. van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
27. Walton, D. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of arguments. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.