Predatory publishing: Take care that you are not caught in the Open Access net

Nursing and Health Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 277-279

  Stone, Teresa Elizabeth ^a   Rossiter, Rachel Cathrine ^b  

^a YAMAGUCHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHARJAH   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; NURSING RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; TRENDS;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84938088668     PISSN: 14410745     EISSN: 14422018     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12215     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Beall J. Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers. Scholarly Open Access. 2015. [Cited 6 Feb 2015.] Available from URL: https://scholarlyoa.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/criteria-2015.pdf.
2. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). 2015. [Cited 7 May 2015.] Available from URL: http://publicationethics.org.
3. Conn VS. Paying the price for open access. West. J. Nurs. Res. 2015; 37: 3-5.
4. INANE "Predatory Publishing Practices" Collaborative. Predatory publishing: What editors need to know. Nurse Author Editor 2014; 24 (3).
5. Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA). Beall's list: potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers. 2015. [Cited 7 May 2015.] Available from URL: http://scholarlyoa.com/publishers/.
6. Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA) Code of Conduct. 2015. [Cited 7 May 2015.] Available from URL: http://oaspa.org/membership/code-of-conduct/.