Economy-wide rebound effects for non-energetic raw materials

Ecological Economics

Volumn 118, Issue , 2015, Pages 132-139

  Pfaff, Matthias ^a   Sartorius, Christian ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Efficiency technology; Non energetic material; Rebound effect; Resource efficiency

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; MATERIAL FLOW ANALYSIS; RESOURCE USE; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

GERMANY;

EID: 84938079996     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baiocchi G., Minx J.C. Understanding changes in the UK's CO2 emissions: a global perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:1177-1184. 10.1021/es902662h.
2. Barker T., Dagoumas A., Rubin J. The macroeconomic rebound effect and the world economy. Energy Effic. 2009, 2:411-427. 10.1007/s12053-009-9053-y.
3. Berkhout H., Muskens J.C., Velthuijsen J.W. Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy 2000, 425-432.
4. Borenstein S. A microeconomic framework for evaluating energy efficiency rebound and some implications. Working Paper Series 2013, Energy Institute, Haas (ei @ Haas), (URL: http://ei.haas.berkeley.edu).
5. Broadstock D.C., Hunt L., Sorrell S. Technical report 3: elasticity of substitution studies. Working Paper 2007.
6. Brunot A., Hovestad A., Hummen T., Joce C., Pena Garay I., Smuk L., Espinoza Tercero, Luis A., Todorovic J., van der Eijk, Casper, Velte D. Substitution of critical raw materials. CRM_InnoNet Deliverable D 3.3 Raw Materials Profiles 2013.
7. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie Rohstoffstrategie der bundesregierung URL:. http://www.bmwi.de/Dateien/BMWi/PDF/rohstoffstrategie-der-bundesregieru%20ng.
8. Bundesregierung Nationale nachhaltigkeitsstrategie, fortschrittsbericht 2012 2012, (URL: http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Publikation/Bestellservice/2012-05-08-fortschrittsbericht-2012.pdf?__blob=publicationFile).
9. Davis L.W. Durable goods and residential demand for energy and water: evidence from a field trial. Rand J. Econ. 2008, 39:530-546.
10. de Haan P., Peters A., Scholz R.W. Reducing energy consumption in road transport through hybrid vehicles: investigation of rebound effects, and possible effects of tax rebates. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15:1076-1084. (URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652606002460). 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.025.
11. Destatis Volkswirtschaftliche gesamtrechnung. Input-output-rechnung 2007 2010.
12. Destatis Bruttoinlandsprodukt 2012 2013, (für deutschland).
13. Dimitropoulos J. Energy productivity improvements and the rebound effect: an overview of the state of knowledge. Energy Policy 2007, 35:6354-6363.
14. Dubin J.A., Miedema A.K., Chandran R.V. Price effects of energy-efficient technologies: a study of residential demand for heating and cooling. Rand J. Econ. 1986, 17:310-325.
15. European Commission 699 Communication "The Raw Materials Initiative - Meeting Our Critical Needs for Growth and Jobs in Europe" 2008, (URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0699:FIN:en:PDF).
16. Freire-González J. Methods to empirically estimate direct and indirect rebound effect of energy-saving technological changes in households. Ecol. Model. 2011, 223:32-40. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.001.
17. Giegrich J., Liebich A., Lauwigi C., Reinhardt J. Indikatoren/Kennzahlen für den Rohstoffverbrauch im Rahmen der Nachhaltigkeitsdiskussion. Texte Nr. 01/2012. U 2012, Umweltbundesamt, Dessau.
18. Graedel T.E., Harper E.M., Nassar N.T., Reck B.K. On the materials basis of modern society. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013, 10.1073/pnas.1312752110.
19. Guerra A.I., Sancho F. Rethinking economy-wide rebound measures: an unbiased proposal. Energy Policy 2010, 38:6684-6694. 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.038.
20. Guertin C., Kumbhakar S., Duraiappah A. Determining Demand for Energy Services: Investigating Income-driven Behaviours 2003, International Institute for Sustainable Development.
21. Hausman J.A. Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables. Bell J. Econ. 1979, 10:33-54.
22. Joshi S. Product environmental life-cycle assessment using input-output techniques. J. Ind. Ecol. 2000, 3:95-120.
23. Khazzoom J.D. An Econometric Model Integrating Conservation in the Estimation of the Residential Demand for Electricity 1986, JAI Press, Greenwich and CT.
24. Kok R., Benders R.M.J., Moll H.C. Measuring the environmental load of household consumption using some methods based on input-output energy analysis: a comparison of methods and a discussion of results. Energy Policy 2006, 34:2744-2761.
25. Maxwell D., McAndrew L. Addressing the rebound effect. Final Report to the European Commission DG ENV 2011.
26. Meyer B., Distelkamp M., Wolter M.I. Material efficiency and economic-environmental sustainability. Results of simulations for Germany with the model PANTA RHEI. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63:192-200.
27. Meyer B., Meyer M., Distelkamp M. Modeling green growth and resource efficiency: new results. Miner. Econ. 2012, 24:145-154.
28. Mizobuchi K. An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs. Energy Econ. 2008, 30:2486-2516. 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.01.001.
29. Saunders H.D. A view from the macro side: rebound, backfire, and khazzoom-brookes. Energy Policy 2000, 28:439-449. 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00024-0.
30. Saunders H.D. Is what we think of as "rebound" really just income effects in disguise?. Energy Policy 2013, 57:308-317. 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.056.
31. Saunders H.D. Toward a neoclassical theory of sustainable consumption: eight golden age propositions. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 105:220-232. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.06.011.
32. Schwartz P.M., Taylor T.N. Cold hands, warm hearth? Climate, net takeback, and household comfort. Energy J. 1995, 16:41-54.
33. Seetzen J., Krengel R., Kortzfleisch G.v. Makroökonomische Input-Output-Analysen und dynamische Modelle zur Erfassung technischer Entwicklungen: Mit Beispielen aus der Energietechnik, Rohstofftechnik, Chemietechnik, Maschinebautechnik. Interdisziplinäre Systemforschung 1979, vol. 69. Birkhäuser, Basel.
34. Semboja H. The effects of an increase in energy efficiency on the Kenya economy. Energy Policy 1994, 22:217-225. 10.1016/0301-4215(94)90160-0.
35. Small K.A., van Dender K. A study to evaluate the effect of reduced greenhouse gas emissions on vehicle miles travelled. Prepared for State of California Air Resources Board, the California Environment Protection Agency and the California Energy Commission. Final Report ARB Contract Number 02-336 2005, Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine.
36. Sorrell S. Jevons' paradox revisited: the evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1456-1469.
37. Sorrell S., Dimitropoulos J. The rebound effect: microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:636-649.
38. Statistisches Bundesamt Produzierendes Gewerbe. Kostenstruktur der Unternehmen des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes sowie des Bergbaus und der Gweinnung von Steinen und Erden. Fachserie 4, reihe 2013, Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden. 4.3 ed.
39. Takase K., Kondo Y., Washizu A. An analysis of sustainable consumption by the waste input-output model. J. Ind. Ecol. 2005, 9:201-219. 10.1162/1088198054084653.
40. Thomas B.A., Azevedo I.L. Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for u.s. households with input-output analysis. Part 1: theoretical framework. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 86:199-210. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.003.
41. Thomas B.A., Azevedo I.L. Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for U.S. households with input-output analysis. Part 2: simulation. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 86:188-198. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.002.
42. Turner K. Negative rebound and disinvestment effects in response to an improvement in energy efficiency in the UK economy. Energy Econ. 2009, 31:648-666. 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.01.008.
43. UKERC Review of Evidence for the Rebound Effect URL:. http://www.ukerc.ac.uk/support/ReboundEffect.
44. van den Bergh J.C.J.M. Energy conservation more effective with rebound policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011, 48:43-58. 10.1007/s10640-010-9396-z.
45. van Es G., Groot A.d, Velthuisen J., van Leeuwen M. A description of the SEO computable general equilibrium model. SEO Report No. 477 1998, Foundation for Economic Research, Amsterdam.
46. Walz R. Employment and structural impacts of material efficiency strategies: results from five case studies. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19:805-815.
47. Walz R., Schön M., Nathani C., Marscheider-Weidemann F., Dreher C., Schirrmeister E., Schleich J., Schneider R. Arbeitswelt in einer nachhaltigen Wirtschaft - Beschäftigungswirkungen von Umweltschutzmaßnahmen. UBA-Texte 44/01 2001, Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.
48. West S.E. Distributional effects of alternative vehicle pollution control policies. J. Public Econ. 2004, 88:735-757. 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00186-X.
49. Ziemann S., Schebek L. Substitution knapper metalle - ein ausweg aus der rohstoffknappheit?. Chem. Ing. Tech. 2010, 82:1965-1975. 10.1002/cite.201000122.