Toward a Decision Tool for Eco-Design Strategy Selection of Aircraft Manufacturers Considering Stakeholders Value Network

SAE International Journal of Materials and Manufacturing

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 73-83

  Keivanpour, Samira ^a   Ait Kadi, Daoud ^a   Mascle, Christian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Eco design techniques; stakeholder's network; synergistic effect; value creation

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECODESIGN; MANUFACTURE; PRODUCT DESIGN;

AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURERS; DESIGN FOR END OF LIVES; DESIGN TECHNIQUE; DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; LIFE CYCLE PERSPECTIVES; STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES; SYNERGISTIC EFFECT; VALUE CREATION;

LIFE CYCLE;

EID: 84938078728     PISSN: 19463979     EISSN: 19463987     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-2278     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Morimoto, R. and Agouridas, V. (2009), “Supporting Aircraft Manufacturers to Formulate and Implement Sustainable Development Strategies Systematically” Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2106, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 12-19.
2. Handfield, R., et al. (2001) “Integrating Environmental Concerns into the Design Process: The Gap between Theory and Practice” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, VOL. 48, NO. 2
3. Bovea, M.D. and Pérez-Belis, V. (2012) “A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process”, Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 61-71
4. Wheele, D., Colber, B. and Freema, E. (2003), Focusing on Value: Reconciling Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and a Stakeholder Approach in a Network World, Journal of General Management. Vol. 28 No. 3
5. Rose, C. (2000) “Design for Environment: A Method for Formulating Product End-Of-Life Strategies” PhD thesis, Stanford University
6. Van Hemel, C. (1998) “Ecodesign empirically explored - Design for Environment in Dutch small and medium sized enterprises.” Design for Sustainability. Delft, NL, Delft University of Technology: 271.
7. Boks, C. (2000) “Assessment of Future End-of-Life Scenarios for Consumer Electronic Products.” Design for Sustainability. Delft, NL, Delft University of Technology.
8. Fiksel, J. (1996) “Design for environment: creating eco-efficient products and processes”, McGraw-Hill, USA
9. Handfield, R., et al. (2001) “Integrating Environmental Concerns into the Design Process: The Gap between Theory and Practice” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, VOL. 48, NO. 2
10. Karlsson, R. and Luttropp, C. (2006), “EcoDesign: what's happening? An overview of the subject area of ecodesign and of the papers in this special issue” Journal of Cleaner Production, 14 (2006), pp. 1291-1298
11. Davidsson, B. (1998), “Modified Product Quality Tools for Improved Environmental Design in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises”, IIIEE Master's theses 98:9. International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, Lund.
12. Halog A. et al. (2001), “Using quality function deployment for technique selection for optimum environmental performance improvement”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 9 (2001), pp. 387-394
13. Chien, Ch. (2002), “A portfolio evaluation framework for selecting R&D projects”, R&D Management 32, 4, 359-368
14. Doerner, K et al. (2004), “Pareto ant colony optimization: A met heuristic approach to multi-objective portfolio selection. Annals of Operations Research, 131, 79-99.
15. Sutherland, T. (2009), “Stakeholder value network analysis for space-Based Erath Observation” Master thesis, MIT.
16. Allee V. (2008), “Value network analysis and value conversion of tangible and intangible assets”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 9 Iss: 1 pp. 5-24
17. Agouridas, V. (2006), “Early alignment of design requirements with stakeholder needs”, Proc. IMechE Vol. 220 Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture
18. Khalifa Azaddin Salem, “Customer value: a review of recent literature and an integrative configuration”, Emerald 42, (2004)
19. Jackson, M., (2008), “Social and Economic Networks”, Princeton University Press
20. Handy, C. Understanding organizations, 4th edition, 1993 (Penguin Group, London, UK) pp. 180-190.
21. Urban, G.L. and Hauser, J.R, (1998), “Design and Marketing Of New Products”, Prentice-Hall, 1980
22. Demange, G. and Wooders, M., (2006), “Group Formation in Economics:Networks, Clubs, and Coalitions”, Cambridge university press
23. Myerson, R., (1997), “Graphs and Cooperation in GamesAuthor(s)”: Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 225-229
24. Jackson M. Wolinsky, A., (1996), “A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks”, journal of economic theory 71, 44-74
25. Khurana, A., and Rosenthal, S. R. (1998), “Towards Holistic “Front Ends” in New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 15, pp. 1557-1574.
26. Bollhöfer, E. et al. (2012), “EcoDesign 2020:Green Design requirements and implementation in the aircraft-industry Germany” - September 14, 2012
27. Heerden, D. and Curran, R. (2010). Value Extraction from End-of-Life Aircraft, Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering
28. The Aircraft at End of Life Sector: a Preliminary Study: http://users.ox.ac.uk/∼pgrant/Airplane_end_of_life.pdf, [accessed on March 12]
29. Watson, M. (2009). End of Aircraft Life Initiatives, SBAC Aviation and Environment Briefing Papers, Available at: http://www.sustainableaviation.co.uk/wpcontent/uploads/end-of-aircraft-life-initiativesbriefing-paper-11.pdf. [accessed on March 12]
30. Siles, Ch. (2011). Aide à la décision pour la gestion d'un parc d'avions en fin de vie, École Polytechnique De Montréal
31. Vesanto, J. et al. (2000), “,SOM Toolbox for Matlab 5”, SOM toolbox team, Helsinki University of technology report A57