MALE VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN NORTH AMERICA AS HATE CRIME

Hate Crimes [5 volumes]

Volumn 1-5, Issue , 2009, Pages 151-172

  DeKeseredy, Walter S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937988260     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (114)

1. Alvi, S., DeKeseredy, W. S., & Ellis, D. (2000). Contemporary social problems in North American society. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Addison-Wesley.
2. Bancroft, L. (2002). Why does he do that?: Inside the minds of angry and controlling men. New York: Berkley.
3. Benedict, J. (1997). Public heroes, private felons: Athletes and crimes against women. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
4. Bergen, R. K. (2006). Marital rape: New research and directions. VAWnet, February, 1-13.
5. Bergen, R. K., & Bogle, K. A. (2000). Exploring the connection between pornography and sexual violence. Violence and Victims, 15, 227-234.
6. Black, D. (1983). Crime as social control. American Sociological Review, 48, 34-45.
7. Bowker, L. H. (1983). Beating wife-beating. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
8. Buchwald, E., Fletcher, P. R., & Roth, M. (Eds.) (1993). Transforming a rape culture. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.
9. Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., et al. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089-1097.
10. Carastathis, A. (2006, October 11). New cuts and conditions for Status of Women Canada. Toronto Star. Retrieved October 11, 2006, from www.dominionpaper.ca/canadian_news/2006/10/11new_cuts_a.html
11. Cousins, A. J., & Gangestad, S. W. (2007). Perceived threats of female infidelity, male proprietariness, and violence in college dating couples. Violence and Victims, 22, 651-668.
12. Cross, P. (2007, July 6). Femicide: Violent partners create war zone for women. Toronto Star, p. AA8.
13. Daly, K., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1988). Feminism and criminology. Justice Quarterly, 5, 497-538.
14. DeKeseredy, W. S. (1990). Male peer support and woman abuse: The current stake of knowledge. Sociological Focus, 23, 129-139.
15. DeKeseredy, W. S. (2006). Future directions. Violence Against Women, 12, 1078-1085.
16. DeKeseredy, W. S. (2008, March 5). Violent men, victimized women. National Post. Retrieved March 5, 2008, from http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/story.html?id=357742
17. DeKeseredy, W. S. (in press). Girls and women as victims of crime. In J. Barker (Ed.), Women and the criminal justice system: A Canadian perspective. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Emond Montgomery Publications.
18. DeKeseredy, W. S., Alvi, S., Schwartz, M. D., & Perry, B. (1999). Violence against and the harassment of women in Canadian public housing. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36, 499-516.
19. DeKeseredy, W. S., Alvi, S. Schwartz, M. D., & Tomaszewski, E. A. (2003). Under siege: Poverty and crime in a public housing community. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
20. DeKeseredy, W. S., Donnermeyer, J. F., Schwartz, M. D., Tunnell, K. D., & Hall, M. (2007). Thinking critically about rural gender relations: Toward a rural masculinity crisis/male peer support model of separation/divorce sexual assault. Critical Criminology, 15, 295-311.
21. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Dragiewicz, M. (2007). Understanding the complexities of feminist perspectives on woman abuse: A commentary on Donald G. Dutton’s Rethinking domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 13, 874-884.
22. DeKeseredy, W. S., Ellis, D., & Alvi, S. (2005). Deviance and crime: Theory, research and policy. Cincinnati, OH: LexisNexis.
23. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Flack, W. F., Jr. (2007). Sexual assault in colleges and universities. In G. Barak (Ed.), Battleground criminal justice (pp. 693-696). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
24. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Joseph, C. (2006). Separation/divorce sexual assault in rural Ohio: Preliminary results of an exploratory study. Violence Against Women, 12, 301-311.
25. DeKeseredy, W. S., & MacLeod, L. (1997). Woman abuse: A sociological story. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Harcourt Brace.
26. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Perry, B. (2006). Introduction: The never-ending and constantly evolving journey. In W. S. DeKeseredy & B. Perry (Eds.), Advancing critical criminology: Theory and application (pp. 1-8). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
27. DeKeseredy, W. S., Perry, B., & Schwartz, M. D. (2007, November). Hate-motivated sexual assault on the college campus: Results from a Canadian representative sample. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.
28. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1991). British left realism on the abuse of women: A critical appraisal. In R. Quinney & H. Pepinsky (Eds.), Criminology as peacemaking (pp. 154-171). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
29. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1996). Contemporary criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
30. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998a). Woman abuse on campus: Results from the Canadian national survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998b). Male peer support and woman abuse in postsecondary school courtship: Suggestions for new directions in sociological research. In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 83-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2002). Theorizing public housing woman abuse as a function of economic exclusion and male peer support. Women’s Health and Urban Life, 1, 26-45.
33. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2005). Masculinities and interpersonal violence. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 353-363). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (in press). Dangerous exits: Escaping abusive relationships in rural America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
35. DeKeseredy, W. S., Schwartz, M. D., Fagen, D., & Hall, M. (2006). Separation/divorce sexual assault: The contribution of male peer support. Feminist Criminology, 1, 228-250.
36. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.
37. Donnermeyer, J. F., Jobes, P., & Barclay, E. (2006). Rural crime, poverty, and community. In W. S. DeKeseredy & B. Perry (Eds.), Advancing critical criminology: Theory and application (pp. 199-218). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
38. Dutton, D. G. (2006). Rethinking domestic violence. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
39. Dworkin, A. (1994). Pornography happens to women [Electronic version]. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/PornHappens.html
40. Ehrlich, H. J. (1999). Campus ethnoviolence. In F. Pincus & H. J. Ehrlich (Eds.), Ethnic conflict (pp. 277-290). Boulder, CO: Westview.
41. Ellis, D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1997). Rethinking estrangement, interventions and intimate femicide. Violence Against Women, 3, 590-609.
42. Ezekiel, R. S. (1995). The racist mind: Portraits of American Neo-Nazis and Klansmen. New York: Viking.
43. Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown.
44. Ferber, A. L. (2000). Racial warriors and weekend warriors: The construction of masculinity in mythopoetic and white supremacist discourse. Men and Masculinities, 3, 30-56.
45. Ferber, A. L. (2004). Introduction. In A. L. Ferber (Ed.), Home-grown hate: gender and organized racism (pp. 1-18). New York: Routledge.
46. Gardner, C. B. (1995). Passing by: Gender and public harassment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47. Gartner, R., Dawson, M., & Crawford, M. (2001). Women killing: Intimate femicide in Ontario, 1874-1994. In D.E.H. Russell & R. A. Harmes (Eds.), Femicide in global perspective (pp. 147-165). New York: Teachers Press.
48. Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York: Simon & Schuster.
49. Gerami, S. (2005). Islamist masculinity and Muslim masculinities. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men & masculinities (pp. 448-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Gerstenfeld, P. B. (2004). Hate crimes: Causes, controls, and controversies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Gordon, M., & Riger, S. (1989). The female fear. New York: Free Press.
52. Green, E., Hebron, S., & Woodward, D. (1987). Women, leisure and social control. In J. Hanmer & M. Maynard (Eds.), Women, violence and social control (pp. 75-92). Atlantic Heights, NJ: Humanities Press.
53. Gronau, A. (1985). Women and images: Feminist analysis of pornography. In C. Vance & V. Burstyn (Eds.), Women against censorship (pp. 127-155). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Douglas and McIntyre.
54. Hammer, R. (2002). Antifeminism and family terrorism: A critical feminist perspective. Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield.
55. Ireland, T. O., Thornberry, T. P., & Loeber, R. (2003). Violence among adolescents living in public housing: A two site analysis. Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 3-38.
56. Jenness, V. (2004). The dilemma of difference: Gender and hate crime policy. In A. L. Ferber (Ed.), Home-grown hate: Gender and organized racism (pp. 181-204). New York: Routledge.
57. Jensen, R. (2007). Getting off: Pornography and the end of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
58. Jensen, R., & Dines, G. (1998). The content of mass-marketed pornography. In G. Dines, R. Jensen, & A. Russo (Eds.), Pornography: The production and consumption of inequality (pp. 65-100). New York: Routledge.
59. Katz, J. (2006). The macho paradox: Why some men hurt women and how all men can help. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
60. Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
61. Kelly, L., & Radford, J. (1987). The problem of men: Feminist perspectives on sexual violence. In P. Scraton (Ed.), Law, order and the authoritarian state (pp. 237-253). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
62. Krishnan, S. P., Hilbert, J. C., & VanLeeuwen, D. (2001). Domestic violence and helpseeking behaviors among rural women. Results from a shelter-based study. Family Community Health, 24, 28-38.
63. Lab, S. P. (2003). Let’s put it into context. Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 39-44.
64. Lenton, R., Smith, M. D., Fox, J., & Morra, N. (1999). Sexual harassment in public places: Experiences of Canadian women. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36, 517-540.
65. Lips, H. M. (2005). Sex and gender: An introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
66. MacQuarrie, B., Welsh, S., Carr, J., & Huntely, A. (2004). Workplace harassment and violence. London, Ontario, Canada: Centre for Research on Violence Against Women and Children, University of Western Ontario.
67. Maidment, M. R. (2006). Transgressing boundaries: Feminist perspectives in criminology. In W. S. DeKeseredy & B. Perry (Eds.), Advancing critical criminology: Theory and application (pp. 43-62). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
68. McPhail, B. (2003). Gender-bias hate crimes: A review. In B. Perry (Ed.), Hate and bias crime: A reader (pp. 261-280). New York: Routledge.
69. Messerschmidt, J. W. (1993). Masculinities and crime: Critique and reconceptualization. Lanham, MD: Roman & Littlefield.
70. Messerschmidt, J. W. (1997). Crime as structured action: Gender, race, class, and crime in the making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Miller, J. (2008). Getting played: African American girls, urban inequality and gendered violence. New York: New York University Press.
72. Miller, S., & Iovanni, L. (2007). Domestic violence policy in the United States. In L. L. O’Toole, H. R. Schiffman, & M. L. Kiter Edwards (Eds.), Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 287-296). New York: New York University Press.
73. MTV.com. (2001, September 28). Tori Amos says Eminem’s fictional dead wife spoke to her [Electronic version]. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.thedent.com/mtvart0901.html
74. Mullings, L. (1994). Images, ideology and women of color. In M. Baca-Zinn & B. T. Dill (Eds.), Women of color in U.S. society (pp. 265-290). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
75. Navin, S., Stockum, R., & Ruggaard, J. (1993). Battered women in rural America. Journal of Human Educational Development, 32, 9-16.
76. O’Leary, D. (1993). Through a psychological lens: Personality traits, personality disorders, and levels of violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 7-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77. Ontario Secondary School Teacher Federation. (1995). The joke’s over: Student to student sexual harassment in secondary schools. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Author.
78. Ontario seeks to stop Eminem concert. (2000, October 26). Daily Texan [Electronic version]. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from http://www.dailytexanonline.com/home/index.cfm?event=displayArticleprinterfriendly&u…
79. Pagelow, M. D. (1992). Adult victims of domestic violence: Battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 87-120.
80. Pagelow, M. D. (1993). Response to Hamberger’s comments. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 137-139.
81. Pendo, E. A. (1994). Recognizing violence against women: Gender and the hate crime statistics act. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 17, 157-183.
82. Perry, B. (2001). In the name of hate: Understanding hate crimes. New York: Routledge.
83. Perry, B. (2003). Accounting for hate crime. In M. D. Schwartz & S. E. Hatty (Eds.), Controversies in critical criminology (pp. 147-160). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
84. Perry, B. (2006). Missing pieces: The paucity of hate crime scholarship. In W. S. De-Keseredy & B. Perry (Eds.), Advancing critical criminology: Theory and application (pp. 155-178). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
85. Polk, K. (2003). Masculinities, femininities and homicide: Competing explanations for male violence. In M. D. Schwartz and S. E. Hatty (Eds.), Controversies in critical criminology (pp. 133-146). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
86. Radford, J. (1987). Policing male violence-policing women. In J. Hanmer & M. Maynard (Eds.), Women, violence and social control (pp. 30-45). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.
87. Rapaport, E. (1994). The death penalty and the domestic discount. In M. Fineman & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 224-254). New York: Routledge.
88. Renzetti, C. M., & Curran, D. J. (2002). Women, men, and society. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
89. Rushowy, K. (2008, March 5). Protection for females demanded. Toronto Star, p. A19.
90. Russell, D. E. H. (2001). Defining femicide and related concepts. In D.E.H. Russell & R. A. Harmes (Eds.), Femicide in global perspective (pp. 12-28). New York: Teachers College Press.
91. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1998). Neighborhood collective efficacy: Does it help reduce violence? Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
92. Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1991). Left realist criminology: Strengths, weaknesses and the feminist critique. Crime, Law and Social Change, 15, 51-72.
93. Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
94. Schwartz, M. D., & DeKeseredy, W. S. (2008). Interpersonal violence against women: The role of men. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, pp. 178-185.
95. Sev’er, A. (1999). Sexual harassment: Where we were, where we are and prospects for the new millennium. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36, 469-498.
96. Simpson, J. (2000). Star-spangled Canadians: Canadians living the American dream. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: HarperCollins.
97. Simpson, S. (1989). Feminist theory, crime and justice. Criminology, 27, 605-632.
98. Smith, M. D. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5, 257-273.
99. Southern Poverty Law Center. (2003). 10 ways to fight hate on campus: A response guide for college activists. Montgomery, AL: Author.
100. Stanko, E. A. (1997). Should I stay or should I go?: Some thoughts on variants of intimate violence. Violence Against Women, 3, 629-635.
101. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press.
102. Stout, K. D. (2001). Intimate femicide: A national demographic overview. In D.E.H. Russell & R. A. Harmes (Eds.), Femicide in global perspective (pp. 41-49). New York: Teachers College Press.
103. Street, A. E., Gradus, J. L., Stafford, J., & Kelly, K. (2007). Gender differences in experiences of sexual harassment: Data from a male-dominated environment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 464-474.
104. United Nations. (1993). Strategies for confronting domestic violence: A resource manual. New York: Author.
105. United Nations. (1995). Focus on women, violence against women. Report prepared for the Fourth World Conference on Women, Action for Equality, Development and Peace. Beijing, China: Author.
106. Vallee, B. (2007). The war on women. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Key Porter.
107. Vance, C. (1984). Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
108. Van Dyke, N., & Tester, G. (2008). The college campus as defended territory: Factors influencing variation in racist hate crime. Pullman, WA: Department of Sociology, Washington State University.
109. Wacquant, L.J.D. (1997). Three pernicious premises in the study of the American ghetto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, July, 341-353.
110. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
111. Webb, D. (1994). Violence against women: Is it a hate crime? Klanwatch Intelligence Report, 73, 4-7.
112. Websdale, N. (1998). Rural woman battering and the justice system: An ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
113. Weisheit, R. A., Falcone, D. N., & Wells, L. E. (2006). Crime and policing in rural and small-town America. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
114. Wolfe, D. A., & Chiodo, D. (2008). Sexual harassment and related behaviors reported among youth from grade 9 to grade 11. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: CAMH Centre for Prevention Science.