Agreement between prospective diary data and retrospective questionnaire report of abdominal pain and stooling symptoms in children with irritable bowel syndrome

Neurogastroenterology and Motility

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1110-1119

  Self, Mariella M ^a,b   Williams, A E ^c   Czyzewski, D I ^a,b   Weidler, E M ^a,b,d   Shulman, R J ^a,b,d  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Texas Children's Hospital   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d CHILDREN S NUTRITION RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Children and adolescents; Functional gastrointestinal disorders; Irritable bowel syndrome; Pain diary; Rome III questionnaire

Indexed keywords

PLACEBO;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; CHILD; CHILD RECALL QUESTIONNAIRE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DEFECATION; DIARRHEA; DISEASE DURATION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FECES; FECES ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IRRITABLE COLON; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PARENT; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROXY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECALL; SELF REPORT; STOMACH DISCOMFORT; STOMACH PAIN; SYMPTOM; COMPLICATION; MEDICAL RECORD; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; DEFECATION; DIARRHEA; FEMALE; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HUMANS; IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84937977511     PISSN: 13501925     EISSN: 13652982     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12590     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Irvine EJ, Whitehead WE, Chey WD, Matsueda K, Shaw M, Talley NJ, Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ et al. Design of treatment trials for functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1538-51.
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, & Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for Industry: Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Food and Drug Administration: Silver Spring, MD. 2009.
3. Broderick JE, Stone AA, Calvanse P, Schwartz JE, Turk DC. Recalled pain ratings: a complex and poorly defined task. J Pain 2006; 7: 142-9.
4. Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, Vikingstad G, Pribbernow M, Grossman S, Stone AA. The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain 2008; 139: 146-57.
5. Eich E, Reeves JL, Jaeger B, Graff-Radford S. Memory for pain: relation between past and present pain intensity. Pain 1985; 23: 375-9.
6. Redelmeier DA, Kahneman D. Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain 1996; 66: 3-8.
7. Schneider S, Stone AA, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE. Peak and end effects in patients' daily recall of pain and fatigue: a within-subjects analysis. J Pain 2011; 12: 228-35.
8. Salovey P, Smith AF, Turk DC, Jobe JE, Willis GB. The accuracy of memory for pain: not so bad most of the time. APS J 1993; 2: 184-91.
9. Weinland SR, Morris CB, Hu Y, Leserman J, Bangdiwala SI, Drossman DA. Characterization of episodes of irritable bowel syndrome using ecological momentary assessment. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1813-20.
10. Stone AA, Broderick JE, Kaell AT, DelesPaul PA, Porter LE. Does the peak-end phenomenon observed in laboratory pain studies apply to real-world pain in rheumatoid arthritis? J Pain 2000; 1: 212-7.
11. Jensen MP, Mardekian J, Lakshminarayanan M, Boye ME. Validity of 24-h recall ratings of pain severity: biasing effects of "Peak" and "End" pain. Pain 2008; 137: 422-7.
12. Niere K, Jerak A. Measurement of headache frequency, intensity and duration: comparison of patient report by questionnaire and headache diary. Physiother Res Int 2004; 9: 149-56.
13. Stone AA, Broderick JE, Schwartz JE. Validity of average, minimum, and maximum end-of-day recall assessments of pain and fatigue. Contemp Clin Trials 2010; 31: 483-90.
14. Lewandowski AS, Palermo TM, Kirchner HL, Drotar D. Comparing diary and retrospective reports of pain and activity restriction in children and adolescents with chronic pain conditions. Clin J Pain 2009; 25: 299-306.
15. Peters ML, Sorbi MJ, Kruise DA, Kerssens JJ, Verhaak PF, Bensing JM. Electronic diary assessment of pain, disability and psychological adaptation in patients differing in duration of pain. Pain 2000; 84: 181-92.
16. Raselli C, Broderick JE. The association of depression and neuroticism with pain reports: a comparison of momentary and recalled pain assessment. J Psychosom Res 2007; 62: 313-20.
17. Stone AA, Broderick JE, Shiffman SS, Schwartz JE. Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain 2004; 107: 61-9.
18. van den Brink M, Bandell-Hoekstra ENG, Abu-Saad HH. The occurrence of recall bias in pediatric headache: a comparison of questionnaire and diary data. Headache 2001; 41: 11-20.
19. Stone AA, Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, Schwarz N. Context effects in survey ratings of health, symptoms, and satisfaction. Med Care 2008; 46: 662-7.
20. Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Slawsby EA, McHugo GJ, Baird JC. Pain assessment in patients with low back pain: comparison of weekly recall and momentary electronic data. J Pain 2006; 7: 192-9.
21. Manning AP, Wyman JB, Heaton KW. How trustworthy are bowel histories? Comparison of recalled and recorded information. Br Med J 1976; 2: 213-4.
22. Heaton KW, Radvan J, Cripps H, Mountford RA, Braddon FE, Hughes AO. Defecation frequency and timing, and stool form in the general population: a prospective study. Gut 1992; 33: 818-24.
23. Pamuk ON, Pamuk GE, Celik AF. Revalidaiton of description of constipation in terms of recall bias and visual scale analog questionnaire. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 18: 1417-22.
24. Ashraf W, Park F, Lof J, Quigley EM. An examination of the reliability of reported stool frequency in the diagnosis of idiopathic constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 26-32.
25. Bellini M, Bove A, Sormani MP, Battaglia E, Bocchini R, Alduini P, Bassotti G, Bruzzi P et al. The daily diary and the questionnaire are not equivalent for the evaluation of bowel habits. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42: 99-102.
26. Palsson OS, Baggish JS, Turner MJ, Whitehead WE. IBS patients show frequent fluctuations between loose/watery and hard/lumpy stools: implications for treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 286-95.
27. Coletta M, Di Palma L, Tomba C, Basilisco G. Discrepancy between recalled and recorded bowel habits in irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 282-8.
28. Lackner JM, Jaccard J, Keefer L, Firth R, Carosella AMM, Sitrin M, Brenner D. The accuracy of patient-reported measures for GI symptoms: a comparison of real time and retrospective reports. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26: 1802-11.
29. Lander J, Hodgins M, Fowler-Kerry S. Children's pain predictions and memories. Behav Res Ther 1992; 30: 117-24.
30. Lehmann HP, Bendebba M, DeAngelis C. The consistency of young children's assessment of remembered painful events. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1990; 11: 128-34.
31. Zonneveld LNL, McGrath PH, Reid GH, Sorbi MJ. Accuracy of children's pain memories. Pain 1997; 71: 297-302.
32. Stinson JN, Jibb L, Lalloo C, Feldman BM, McGrath PJ, Petroz GC, Streiner D, Dupuis et al. Comparison of average weekly pain using recalled paper and momentary assessment electronic diary reports in children with arthritis. Clin J Pain 2014; 30: 1044-50.
33. van der Plas TN, Benninga MA, Redekop WK, Taminiau JA, Buller HA. How accurate is the recall of bowel habits in children with defecation disorders. Eur J Pediatr 1997; 156: 178-81.
34. Chogle A, Sztainberg M, Bass L, Youssef NN, Miranda A, Nurko S, Hyman P, Cocjin et al. Accuracy of pain recall in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012; 55: 288-91.
35. Czyzewski DI, Lane MM, Weidler EM, Williams AE, Swank PR, Shulman RS. Interpretation of Rome III criteria and method of assessment affect the irritable bowel syndrome classification of children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 403-11.
36. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32: 920-4.
37. Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SS. Developing criteria for establishing the interrater reliability of specific items in a given inventory. Am J Ment Defic 1981; 86: 127-37.
38. Cicchetti D, Bronen R, Spencer S, Haut S, Berg A, Oliver P, Tyrer P. Rating scales, scales of measurement, issues of reliability: resolving some critical issues for clinicians and researchers. J Nerv Ment Dis 2006; 194: 557-61.
39. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307-10.
40. Rasquin A, Di Lorenzo C, Forbes D, Guiraldes E, Hyams JS, Staiano A, Walker LS. Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: Child/Adolescent. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1527-37.
41. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development of support labeling claims. 2009. Federal Register. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf.
42. Norquist JM, Girman C, Fehnel S, DeMuro-Mercon C, Santanello N. Choice of recall period for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: criteria for consideration. Qual Life Res 2012; 21: 1013-20.
43. van der Veek SMC, Derkx BHF, Benninga MA, Benninga MA, Boer F, de Haan E. Cognitive behavior therapy for pediatric functional abdominal pain: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 2013; 132: e1163-72.
44. Naliboff BD. Choosing outcome variables: global assessment and diaries. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: S129-34.
45. Palermo TM, Valenzuela D, Stork PP. A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children: impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability. Pain 2004; 107: 213-9.
46. Stone AA, Broderick JE, Schwartz JE, Shiffman S, Litcher-Kelly L, Calvanese P. Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Pain 2003; 104: 343-51.
47. Marceau LD, Link CL, Smith LD, Carolan SJ, Jamison RN. In-clinic use of electronic pain diaries: barriers of implementation among pain physicians. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010; 40: 291-404.
48. Jensen MP, Turner LR, Turner JA, Romano JM. The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 1996; 67: 35-40.
49. Stone AA, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Shiffman SS. Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: a consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2005; 31: 1340-6.
50. Kenton K, Fitzgerald MP, Brubaker L. What is a clinician to do-believe the patient or her urinary diary? J Urol 2006; 176: 633-5.
51. Conner TS, Barrett LF. Trends in ambulatory self-report: the role of momentary experience in psychosomatic medicine. Psychosom Med 2012; 74: 327-37.