Exploring compatible and incompatible transactions in teams

Cognition, Technology and Work

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 367-380

  Sorensen, Linda J ^a,b   Stanton, Neville A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH EASTERN NORWAY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Compatible SA; Contention scheduling; Distributed SA; SA transactions; Schema theory

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

COMPATIBLE SA; CONTENTION SCHEDULING; DISTRIBUTED SA; SA TRANSACTIONS; SCHEMA THEORY;

SCHEDULING;

EID: 84937968056     PISSN: 14355558     EISSN: 14355566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-015-0335-1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Artman H, Garbis C (1998) Situation awareness as distributed cognition. In: European conference on cognitive science, 1998 Limerick, Ireland, cognition and cooperation, pp 151–156
2. Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering: a study of experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3. Bundy G (1994) Not so friendly fire: considerations for reducing the risk of fratricide newport. Naval War College
4. Dockrell S, O’Grady E, Bennett K, Mullarkey C, Mcconnel R, Ruddy R, Twomey S, Flannery C (2012) An investigation of the reliability of Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) as a method of assessment of children’s computing posture. Appl Ergon 43:632–636
5. Grasser AC, Nakamura GV (1982) The impact of schemata on comprehension and memory. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory. Academic Press, New York
6. Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. The MIT Press, Cambridge
7. Jentsch F, Bowers C (2005) Team communication analysis. In: Stanton NA, Hedge A, Brookhuis K, Salas E, Hendrick H (eds) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, pp 50-1–50-9
8. Kylesten B, Nählinder S (2011) The effect of decision-making training: results from a command-and-control training facility. Cogn Technol Work 13(2):93–101
9. Malone TG, Schapp RE (2002) The “Red Team”. Forging a well-conceived contingency plan. Aerosp Power 16:22–30
10. Mandler JM (1984) Stories scripts and scenes: aspects of schema theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
11. Mitchell R, Nicholas S (2006) Knowledge creation in groups: the value of cognitive diversity, transactive memory, and open-mindedness norms. Electron J Knowl Manag 4:67–74
12. Neisser U (1976) Cognition and reality: principles and implications for cognitive psychology. Freeman, San Fransisco
13. Norman DA (1981) Categorization of action slips. Psychol Rev 88:1–15
14. Norman DA, Shallice T (1986) Attention to action. In: Davidson RJ, Schwartz GE, Shapiro D (eds) Consciousness and self-regulation. Advances in research and theory. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–18
15. Patrick J, Ahmed A, Halliday P (2006) Observational assessment of situation awareness: theory and application. Ergonomics 49:393–417
16. Piaget J (1961) The genetic approach to the psychology of thought. J Educ Psychol 52:275–281
17. Plant KL, Stanton NA (2012) Why did the pilots shut down the wrong engine? Explaining errors in context using schema theory and the perceptual cycle model. Saf Sci 50:300–315
18. Plant KL, Stanton NA (2013) The explanatory power of schema theory: theoretical foundations and future applications in ergonomics. Ergonomics 56:1–15
19. Rafferty LA, Stanton NA, Walker GH (2012) Human factors of fratricide. Ashgate, Aldershot
20. Rafferty L, Stanton NA, Walker GH (2013) Great expectations: a thematic analysis of situation awareness in fratricide. Saf Sci 56:63–71
21. Salmon PM, Stanton NA, Walker GH, Jenkins DP, Baber C, Mcmaster R (2008) Representing situation awareness in collaborative systems: a case study in the energy domain. Ergonomics 51:367–384
22. Salmon PM, Stanton NA, Walker GH, Baber C, Jenkins DP, Mcmaster R, Young MS (2009) What is really going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 9:297–323
23. Sanderson PM, Verhage AG, Fuld RB (1989) State-space and verbal protocol methods for studying the human operator in process control. Ergonomics 32:1343–1372
24. Shu Y, Furuta K (2005) An inference method of team situation awareness based on mutual awareness. Cognitive model of team cooperation in en-route air traffic control. Cogn Technol Work 7(4):272–287
25. Simmons JE (2003) Managing risks prevents fratricide. Flightfax Army Aviat Risk Manag Inf 31:3
26. Smith K, Hancock PA (1995) Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Hum Factors 37:137–148
27. Soraji Y, Furuta K, Kanno T, Aoyama H, Inoue S, Karikawa D, Takahashi M (2012) Cognitive model of team cooperation in en-route air traffic control. Cogn Technol Work 14(2):93–105
28. Stanton NA, Stammers RB (2008) Bartlett and the future of ergonomics. Ergonomics 51:1–13
29. Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Walker GH, Jenkins DP (2006) Distributed situational awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics 49:1288–1311
30. Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Walker GH, Jenkins DP (2009a) Genotype and phenotype schema and their role in distributed situation awareness in collaborative systems. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 10:43–68
31. Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Walker GH, Jenkins DP (2009b) Genotype and phenotype schemata as models of situation awareness in dynamic command and control teams. Int J Ind Ergon 39:480–489
32. Strauss R, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, London
33. Walker GH, Stanton NA, Chowdhury I (2013) Self explaining roads and situation awareness. Saf Sci 56:18–28
34. Wegner DM (1986) Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of group mind. In: Mullen B, Goethals GR (eds) Theories of group behaviour. Springer, New Youk, pp 185–208