Connectivity conservation: Boundary objects, science narratives and the co-production of science and practice

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 51, Issue , 2015, Pages 292-303

  Wyborn, Carina ^a  

^a Luc Hoffmann Institute WWF International   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Australia; Boundary object; Co production; Connectivity conservation; Science narrative

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNMENT; HABITAT; LANDSCAPE; LITERATURE; NOMENCLATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WILDLIFE;

EID: 84937942033     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Bednarek A.T., Shouse B., Hudson C.G. Science-policy intermediaries from a practitioner's perspective: the Lenfest Ocean Program experience. Sci. Public Policy 2015, 1-10. 10.1093/scipol/scv008.
2. Beier P., Gregory A. Desperately seeking stable 50-year-old landscapes with patches and long, wide corridors. PLoS Biology 2012, 10(1):e1001253.
3. Brand F.S., Jax K. Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12(1):23.
4. Bowker G., Star S.L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences 2000, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
5. Cash D.W., Borck J.C., Patt A.G. Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making: comparative analysis of El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2006, 31(4):465-494.
6. Cash D., Clark W., Alcock F., Dickson N., Eckley N., Guston D., Jager J., Mitchell R. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. PNAS 2003, 100(14):8086-8091.
7. Corburn J. Cities, Climate Change and Urban Heat Island Mitigation: Localising Global Environmental Science. Urban Studies 2009, 46(2):413-427. 10.1177/0042098008099361.
8. Crooks K., Sanjayan M. Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature. Connectivity Conservation 2006, 1-21. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. K. Crooks, M. Sanjayan (Eds.).
9. Curtis A. The landcare experience. Managing Australia's Environment 2003, 442-460. Federation Press, Annadale, NSW. S. Dovers, S. Wild River (Eds.).
10. Clark W.C., Tomich T.P., van Noordwijk M., Guston D., Catacutan D., Dickson N.M., McNie E. Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 10.1073/pnas.0900231108.
11. Dilling L., Lemos M.C. Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Global Environ. Change 2011, 21(2):680-689.
12. Doerr V., Doerr E., Davies M. Does Structural Connectivity Facilitate Dispersal of Native Species in Australia's Fragmented Terrestrial Landscapes? 2010.
13. Doerr V., Barrett T., Doerr E. Connectivity, dispersal behaviour and conservation under climate change: a response to Hodgson et al. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48(1):143-147.
14. Dovers S. Still settling Australia: environment, history and policy. Environmental History and Policy: Still Settling Australia 2000, 2-23. Oxford University Press, Melbourne. S. Dovers (Ed.).
15. Dovers S. The Australian environmental policy agenda. Aust. J. Public Adm. 2013, 72(2):114-128.
16. Egmond S., Zeiss R. Modeling for policy science-based models as performative boundary objects for Dutch policy making. Sci. Stud. 2010, 23(1):58-78.
17. Linking Australia's Landscapes: Lessons and Opportunities from Large-scale Conservation Networks 2013, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. J.A. Fitzsimons, I. Pulsford, G. Westcott (Eds.).
18. Gieryn T.F. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line 1998, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
19. Gieryn T.F. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am. Soc. Rev. 1983, 48(6):781-795.
20. Gold R. Roles in sociological field observation. Soc. Forces 1958, 36(3):217-223.
21. Goldman M. Constructing connectivity: conservation corridors and conservation politics in East African rangelands. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2009, 99(2):335-359.
22. Guston D.H. Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: the role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization. Soc. Stud. Sci. 1999, 87-111.
23. Guston D.H. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2001, 26(4):399-408.
24. Habitat 141° Habitat 141° Governance: Report and Recommendations of the Habitat 141° Governance Working Group. Internal document, Melbourne 2010.
25. Hegger D., Lamers M., Van Zeijl-Rozema A., Dieperink C. Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 18:52-65. 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.002.
26. Hess G.R., Fischer R.A. Communicating clearly about conservation corridors. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 55(3):195-208.
27. Hilty J.A., Lidicker W.Z., Merenlender A.M., Dobson P.P. Corridor Ecology: The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation 2006, Island Press, Washington, DC.
28. Hodgson J.A., Moilanen A., Wintle B.A., Thomas C.D. Habitat area, quality and connectivity: striking the balance for efficient conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48(1):148-152.
29. Hodgson J.A., Thomas C.D., Wintle B.A., Moilanen A. Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision-making: back to basics. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46(5):964-969.
30. IUCN Connectivity Conservation: International Experience in Planning, Establishment and Management of Biodiversity Corridors 2007, IUCN Regional Protected Areas Programme, Asia, Bangkok.
31. Jasanoff S. Ordering knowledge, ordering society. States of Knowledge 2004, 13-45. Routledge, New York. Jasanoff (Ed.).
32. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order 2004, Routledge, New York. S. Jasanoff (Ed.).
33. Jasanoff S. A new climate for society. Theory Cult. Soc. 2010, 27(2):233-253.
34. Keller A.C. Science in environmental policy: the politics of objective advice 2009, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Knight A.T., Cowling R.M., Campbell B.M. An operational model for implementing conservation action. Conservation Biology 2006, 20:408-419.
36. Koch P. Conservation at large scales: Ecological research workshop to inform Habitat 141° planning. Workshop report, Melbourne, 17th February 2009 2009.
37. Layder D. Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research 1998, Sage, London.
38. Lemos M.C., Morehouse B.J. The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Global Environ. Change 2005, 15(1):57-68.
39. Levin K., Petersen B. Tradeoffs in the policy process in advancing climate change adaptation: the case of Australia's great eastern ranges initiative. J. Nat. Resour. Policy Res. 2011, 3(2):145-162.
40. Lindenmayer D.B., Fischer J. Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 2007, 22(3):127-132.
41. Lockie S. Beyond a 'good thing': political interests and the meaning of Landcare. Critical Landcare 1997, 29-45. Centre for Social Research, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW. S. Lockie, F. Vanclay (Eds.).
42. Lockwood M. Scoping the territory: considerations for connectivity conservation managers. Connectivity Conservation Management 2010, 34-51. Earthscan, London, UK. G. Worboys, W. Francis, M. Lockwood (Eds.).
43. Mahony M. Boundary spaces: science, politics and the epistemic geographies of climate change in Copenhagen, 2009. Geoforum 2013, 49:29-39.
44. Marshall M. The key informant technique. Fam. Pract. 1996, 13(1):92-97.
45. Miller C. Climate science and the making of a global political order. States of Knowledge 2004, 46-55. Routledge, New York. S. asanoff (Ed.).
46. Miller C. Hybrid management: boundary organisations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2001, 26:478-498.
47. Muñoz-Erickson T.A. Co-production of knowledge - action systems in urban sustainable governance: the KASA approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 37:182L 191.
48. Parker J., Crona B. On being all things to all people: boundary organizations and the contemporary research university. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2012, 42(2):262-289.
49. Pielke R.A. When scientists politicize science: making sense of controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist. Environ. Sci. Policy 2004, 7:405-417.
50. Possingham H. Big thinking for a big country: continental-scale connections: is bigger better? And if so, where do you put them?. Decis. Point 2009, 26:10-11.
51. Saunders D., Hobbs R., Margules C. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv. Biol. 1991, 5(1):18-32.
52. Saunders D.A., Briggs S.V. Nature grows in straight lines-or does she? What are the consequences of the mismatch between human-imposed linear boundaries and ecosystem boundaries?. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2002, 61(2-4):71-82.
53. Star S., Griesemer J. Institutional ecology, 'translation', boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrae zoology 1907-39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 1989, 19:387-420.
54. Star S.L. This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2010, 35(5):601-617.
55. Stone D. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision-making 1997, Norton, New York.
56. Turnhout E. The rise and fall of a policy: policy succession and the attempted termination of ecological corridors policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sci. 2009, 42(1):57-72.
57. Turnhout E., Waterton C., Neves K., Buizer M. Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to living with. Conserv. Lett. 2013, 6:154-161.
58. Turnhout E., Neves K., de Lijster E. 'Measurementality' in biodiversity governance: knowledge, transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environ. Plan. A 2014, 46:581-597.
59. van Kerkhoff L. Knowledge governance for sustainable development: a review. Chall. Sustain. 2013, 1(2):82-93.
60. van Kerkhoff L., Lebel L. Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2006, 31(1):445-477.
61. van Kerkhoff L., Lebel L. Co-productive capacities: rethinking science and governance in a diverse world. Ecol. Soc. 2015, 20(1):14. 10.5751/ES-07188-200114.
62. Vogel C., Moser S.C., Kasperson R.E., Dabelko G.D. Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Global Environ. Change 2007, 17(3-4):349-364.
63. Wehrens R., Bekker M., Bal R. Hybrid management configurations in joint research. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2014, 39(1):6-41.
64. Worboys G. The connectivity conservation imperative. Connectivity Conservation Management 2010, 3-18. Earthscan, London, UK. G. Worboys, W. Francis, M. Lockwood (Eds.).
65. Worboys G., Francis W., Lockwood M. Connectivity Conservation Management: A Global Guide 2010, Earthscan, London, UK.
66. Wyborn C. Co-productive governance: a relational framework for adaptive governance. Global Environ. Change 2015, 30:56-67.
67. Wyborn C. Cross-scale linkages in connectivity conservation: adaptive governance challenges in spatially distributed networks. Environ. Policy Gov. 2014, 10.1002/eet.1657.
68. Wyborn C. Landscape scale ecological connectivity: Australian survey and rehearsals. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 17(2):121-130.
69. Wynne B. Seasick on the third wave? Subverting the Hegemony of propositionalism: response to Collins & Evans (2002). Soc. Stud. Sci. 2003, 33(3):401-417.
70. Yanow D. Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis 2000, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.