Cluster-based computational methods for mass univariate analyses of event-related brain potentials/fields: A simulation study

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 250, Issue , 2015, Pages 85-93

  Pernet, C R ^a   Latinus, M ^b   Nichols, T E ^c   Rousselet, G A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cluster based statistics; ERP; Family wise error rate; Monte Carlo simulations; Multiple comparison correction; Threshold free cluster enhancement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FAMILY WISE ERROR RATE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SAMPLE; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SOFTWARE;

BRAIN; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATASETS AS TOPIC; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84937915830     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: 1872678X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bullmore E.T., Suckling J., Overmeyer S., Rabe-Hesketh S., Taylor E., Brammer M.J. Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999, 18(1):32-42.
2. Dunn O.J. Multiple comparisons among means. J Am Stat Assoc 1961, 56:52-64.
3. Efron B., Tibshirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap 1993, Chapman and Hall, New York.
4. Gorgolewski K.J., Storkey A.J., Bastin M.E., Pernet C.R. Adaptive thresholding for reliable topological inference in single subject fMRI analysis. Front Hum Neurosci 2012, 6. 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00245.
5. Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1988, 75(4):800-802.
6. Kiebel S.J., Friston K.J. Statistical parametric mapping for event-related potentials: I. Generic considerations. Neuroimage 2004, 22(2):492-502.
7. Kilner J.M., Kiebel S.J., Friston K.J. Applications of random field theory to electrophysiology. Neurosci Lett 2005, 374(3):174-178.
8. Maris E., Oostenveld R. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods 2007, 164(1):177-190.
9. Mensen A., Khatami R. Advanced EEG analysis using threshold-free cluster-enhancement and non-parametric statistics. Neuroimage 2013, 67:111-118.
10. Nichols T., Hayasaka S. Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Stat Methods Med Res 2003, 12(5):419-446.
11. Oostenveld R., Fries P., Maris E., Schoffelen J.M. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011, 201:1. 10.1155/2011/156869.
12. Pernet C.R., Chauveau N., Gaspar C., Rousselet G.A. LIMO EEG: a toolbox for hierarchical linear modeling of electroencephalographic data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011, 2011:1-11. 10.1155/2011/831409.
13. Poline J.-B., Mazoyer B.M. Analysis of individual positron emission tomography activation maps by detection of high signal-to-noise-ratio pixel clusters. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993, 13(3):425-437.
14. Rousselet G.A., Gaspar C.M., Pernet C.R., Husk J.S., Bennett P.J., Sekuler A.B. Healthy aging delays scalp EEG sensitivity to noise in a face discrimination task. Front Psychol 2010, 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00019.
15. Rousselet G.A., Husk J.S., Pernet C.R., Gaspar C.M., Bennett P.J., Sekuler A.B. Age-related delay in information accrual for faces: evidence from a parametric, single-trial EEG approach. BMC Neurosci 2009, 10(1):114. 10.1186/1471-2202-10-114.
16. Smith S., Nichols T. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009, 44(1):83-98. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061.
17. Troendle J., Korn E., Mcshane L.M. An example of slow convergence of the bootstrap in high dimensions. Am Stat 2004, 58(1):25-29.
18. Wilcox R. Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing 2012, Academic Press, Elsevier, Oxford, UK. 3rd ed.
19. Worsley K.J., Friston K. Analysis of fMRI time-series revised - again. Neuroimage 1995, 2:173-181.