High-definition and non-invasive brain modulation of pain and motor dysfunction in chronic TMD

Brain Stimulation

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1085-1092

  Donnell, Adam ^a   Nascimento, Thiago D ^a   Lawrence, Mara ^a   Gupta, Vikas ^a   Zieba, Tina ^a   Truong, Dennis Q ^b   Bikson, Marom ^b   Datta, Abhi ^c   Bellile, Emily ^d   DaSilva, Alexandre F ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c Soterix Medical   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Pain; PainTrek; Temporomandibular disorder; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CHRONIC PAIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAW DISEASE; JAW MOVEMENT; MCGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MYOFASCIAL PAIN; NEUROMODULATION; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SYNDROME SCALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ANALGESIA; BRAIN; FOLLOW UP; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDERS;

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN; CHRONIC PAIN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDERS; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

EID: 84937892689     PISSN: 1935861X     EISSN: 18764754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. L. LeResche Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for the investigation of etiologic factors Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 8 3 1997 291 305
2. J.A. Lipton, J.A. Ship, and D. Larach-Robinson Estimated prevalence and distribution of reported orofacial pain in the United States J Am Dent Assoc 124 10 1993 Oct 115 121
3. C.J. Woolf, and Q. Ma Nociceptors-noxious stimulus detectors Neuron 55 3 2007 Aug 2 353 364
4. M.C. Lima, and F. Fregni Motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature Neurology 70 24 2008 Jun 10 2329 2337
5. T. Tsubokawa, Y. Katayama, T. Yamamoto, T. Hirayama, and S. Koyama Chronic motor cortex stimulation for the treatment of central pain Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 52 1991 137 139
6. F. Velasco, C. Arguelles, J.D. Carrillo-Ruiz, and et al. Efficacy of motor cortex stimulation in the treatment of neuropathic pain: A randomized double-blind trial J Neurosurg 108 4 2008 Apr 698 706
7. A.F. DaSilva, A. Datta, M.E. Mendonca, and et al. Chronic migraine alleviation by tDCS is predicted to Be associated with current flow through pain-related (Sub) cortical regions Headache 51 2011 Jun 48 49
8. A.F. DaSilva, M.S. Volz, M. Bikson, and F. Fregni Electrode positioning and montage in transcranial direct current stimulation J Vis Exp 51 2011
9. J.P. Lefaucheur, N. Andre-Obadia, A. Antal, and et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) Clin Neurophysiol 125 11 2014 Nov 2150 2206
10. M.F. DosSantos, I.K. Martikainen, T.D. Nascimento, and et al. Building up analgesia in humans via the endogenous μ-opioid system by combining placebo and active tDCS: A preliminary report PLoS One 9 7 2014 Jul e102350
11. M.F. DosSantos, T.M. Love, I.K. Martikainen, and et al. Immediate effects of tDCS on the mu-opioid system of a chronic pain patient Front Psychiatry 3 2012 93
12. M.F. Villamar, M.S. Volz, M. Bikson, A. Datta, A.F. Dasilva, and F. Fregni Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) J Vis Exp 77 2013 e50309
13. E.L. Schiffman, R. Ohrbach, E.L. Truelove, and et al. The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. V: methods used to establish and validate revised Axis I diagnostic algorithms J Orofac Pain 24 1 2010 Winter 63 78
14. J.E. Bolton, and R.C. Wilkinson Responsiveness of pain scales: A comparison of three pain intensity measures in chiropractic patients J Manipulative Physiol Ther 21 1 1998 Jan 1 7
15. F. Fregni, P.S. Boggio, M.C. Lima, and et al. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury Pain 122 1-2 2006 May 197 209
16. E.J. Yoon, Y.K. Kim, H.R. Kim, S.E. Kim, Y. Lee, and H.I. Shin Transcranial direct current stimulation to lessen neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: A mechanistic PET study Neurorehabil Neural Repair 28 3 2014 Mar 250 259
17. G.S. Goncalves, I.C. Borges, B.T. Goes, and et al. Effects of tDCS induced motor cortex modulation on pain in HTLV-1: A blind randomized clinical trial Clin J Pain 30 9 2014 Sep 809 815
18. K.D. Wright, G.J. Asmundson, and D.R. McCreary Factorial validity of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Eur J Pain 5 3 2001 279 284
19. D. Watson, L.A. Clark, and A. Tellegen Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales J Pers Soc Psychol 54 6 1988 Jun 1063 1070
20. M. Kang, B.G. Ragan, and J.H. Park Issues in outcomes research: an overview of randomization techniques for clinical trials J Athl Train 43 2 2008 Apr-Jun 215 221
21. J.P. Nguyen, J.P. Lefaucheur, P. Decq, and et al. Chronic motor cortex stimulation in the treatment of central and neuropathic pain. Correlations between clinical, electrophysiological and anatomical data Pain 82 3 1999 Sep 245 251
22. Y. Huang, J.P. Dmochowski, Y. Su, A. Datta, C. Rorden, and L.C. Parra Automated MRI segmentation for individualized modeling of current flow in the human head J Neural Eng 10 6 2013 Dec 066004
23. A. Datta, V. Bansal, J. Diaz, J. Patel, D. Reato, and M. Bikson Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad Brain Stimul 2 4 2009 Oct 201 207.e1
24. T. Wagner, F. Fregni, S. Fecteau, A. Grodzinsky, M. Zahn, and A. Pascual-Leone Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study Neuroimage 35 3 2007 Apr 15 1113 1124
25. M. Bikson, and A. Datta Guidelines for precise and accurate computational models of tDCS Brain Stimul 5 3 2012 Jul 430 431
26. P.C. Gandiga, F.C. Hummel, and L.G. Cohen Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation Clin Neurophysiol 117 4 2006 Apr 845 850
27. P.J. Wrigley, S.M. Gustin, L.N. McIndoe, R.J. Chakiath, L.A. Henderson, and P.J. Siddall Longstanding neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury is refractory to transcranial direct current stimulation: A randomized controlled trial Pain 154 10 2013 Oct 2178 2184
28. F. Fregni, R. Gimenes, A.C. Valle, and et al. A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia Arthritis Rheum 54 12 2006 Dec 3988 3998
29. A. Valle, S. Roizenblatt, S. Botte, and et al. Efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results of a randomized, sham-controlled longitudinal clinical trial J Pain Manag 2 3 2009 353 361
30. A. Antal, D. Terney, S. Kuhnl, and W. Paulus Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition J Pain Symptom Manage 39 5 2010 May 890 903
31. F. Mori, C. Codeca, H. Kusayanagi, and et al. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis J Pain 11 5 2010 May 436 442
32. A.F. Dasilva, M.E. Mendonca, S. Zaghi, and et al. tDCS-induced analgesia and electrical fields in pain-related neural networks in chronic migraine Headache 52 8 2012 Sep 1283 1295
33. N.R. Franca, E.F. Toniolo, A.C. Franciosi, and et al. Antinociception induced by motor cortex stimulation: somatotopy of behavioral response and profile of neuronal activation Behav Brain Res 250 2013 Aug 1 211 221
34. S. Zaghi, B. Thiele, D. Pimentel, T. Pimentel, and F. Fregni Assessment and treatment of pain with non-invasive cortical stimulation Restor Neurol Neurosci 29 6 2011 439 451
35. M.F. DosSantos, I.K. Martikainen, T.D. Nascimento, and et al. Building up analgesia in humans via the endogenous mu-opioid system by combining placebo and active tDCS: A preliminary report PLoS One 9 7 2014 e102350
36. C.S. Greene, G. Goddard, G.M. Macaluso, and G. Mauro Topical review: placebo responses and therapeutic responses. How are they related? J Orofac Pain 23 2 2009 Spring 93 107
37. A.R. Brunoni, J. Amadera, B. Berbel, M.S. Volz, B.G. Rizzerio, and F. Fregni A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 14 8 2011 Sep 1133 1145
38. S.K. Kessler, P.E. Turkeltaub, J.G. Benson, and R.H. Hamilton Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation Brain Stimul 5 2 2012 Apr 155 162
39. N.E. O'Connell, B.M. Wand, L. Marston, S. Spencer, and L.H. Desouza Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4 2014 CD008208
40. R. Sparing, D. Buelte, I.G. Meister, T. Paus, and G.R. Fink Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: A comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies Hum Brain Mapp 29 1 2008 Jan 82 96