Patient and physician reports of the information provided about illness and treatment: What matters for patients' adaptation to cancer during treatment?

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 901-909

  Paschali, Antonia A ^a   Hadjulis, Michael ^a   Papadimitriou, Angela ^a   Karademas, Evangelos C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

cancer; illness representations; information provision; oncology; patient physician communication

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO ILLNESS; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; COPING BEHAVIOR; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EARLY CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; METASTASIS; NEOPLASM; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT INFORMATION; SELF CONTROL; TIME TO TREATMENT; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS;

EID: 84937816464     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: 10991611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3741     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. National Cancer Institute. Patient-centered communication in cancer care. Promoting healing and reducing suffering. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, 2007.
2. Mathews JJ,. The communication process in clinical settings. Soc Sci Med 1983; 17: 1371-1378.
3. Kleinman A,. Patients and Healers in the Context of Culture. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, 1980.
4. Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D,. The common sense representations of illness danger. In Medical Psychology, Rachman S, (ed.), vol. 2. New York, NY: Pergamon, 1980; 7-30.
5. Cohen MZ, Tripp-Reimer T, Smith C, Sorofman B, Lively S,. Explanatory models of diabetes: patient practitioner variation. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 59-66.
6. Phillips LA, Leventhal H, Leventhal EA,. Physicians' communication of the common-sense self-regulation model results in greater reported adherence than physicians' use of interpersonal skills. Br J Health Psychol 2012; 17: 244-257.
7. Petrie KJ, Cameron L, Ellis CJ, Buick D, Weinman J,. Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med 2002; 64: 580-586.
8. Street RL Jr., How clinician-patient communication contributes to health improvement: modeling pathways from talk to outcome. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 92: 286-291.
9. Street RL Jr, Makoul G, Arora N, Epstein RM,. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 74: 295-301.
10. Leventhal H, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA,. Illness cognition: using common sense to understand treatment adherence and affect cognition treatment. Cognitive Ther Res 1992; 16: 223-230.
11. Leventhal H, Halm E, Horowitz C, Leventhal EA, Ozakinci G,. Living with chronic illness: a contextualized, self-regulation approach. In The SAGE Handbook of Health Psychology, Sutton S, Baum A, Johnston M, (eds). Sage: London, UK, 2005; 197-240.
12. Hagger MS, Orbell S,. A meta-analytic review of the common-sense model of illness representations. Psychol Health 2003; 18: 141-184.
13. Theunissen NCM, de Ridder DTD, Bensing JM, Rutten GEHM,. Manipulation of patient-provider interaction: discussing illness representations or action plans concerning adherence. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 51: 247-258.
14. de Ridder DTD, Theunissen NCM, van Dulmen SM,. Does training general practitioners to elicit patients' illness representations and action plans influence their communication as a whole? Patient Educ Couns 2007; 66: 327-336.
15. Whitehead K, Kandler R, Reuber M,. Patients' and neurologists' perception of epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsia 2013; 54: 708-717.
16. Alami S, Boutron I, Desjeux D, et al,. Patients' and practitioners' views of knee osteoarthritis and its management: a qualitative interview study. PlosOne 2011; 6 (5): e19634.
17. Heijmans M, Foets M, Rijken M, Schreurs K, de Ridder D, Bensing J,. Stress in chronic disease: do the perceptions of patients and their general practitioners match? Br J Health Psychol 2001; 6: 229-242.
18. Helman CG,. Communication in primary care: the role of patient and practitioner explanatory models. Soc Sci Med 1985; 20: 923-931.
19. St Claire L, Watkins CJ, Billinghurst B,. Differences in meanings of health: an exploratory study of general practitioners and their patients. Fam Pract 1996; 13: 511-516.
20. Sultan S, Attabi C, Gilbert S, Zenasni F, Hartemann A,. Physicians' understanding of patients' personal representations of their diabetes: accuracy and association with self-care. Psychol Health 2011; 26: 101-117.
21. Eggly S, Penner LA, Hagiwara N, et al,. Patient, companion, and oncologist agreement regarding information discussed during triadic oncology clinical interactions. Psycho-Oncology 2013; 22: 637-645.
22. Gabrijel S, Grize L, Helfenstein E, et al,. Receiving the diagnosis of lung cancer: patient recall of information and satisfaction with physician communication. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 297-302.
23. Street RL Jr., Analyzing communication in medical consultations: do behavioral measures correspond to patients' perceptions? Med Care 1992; 30: 976-988.
24. Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH, Boyer MJ,. The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 1997; 8: 857-863.
25. Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie KJ, Horne R, Cameron LD,. The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychol Health 2002; 17: 1-16.
26. Karademas EC, Tsaousis I,. The personality bi-level effect on chronic cardiac patients' health: intra- and inter-personal relations. Ann Behav Med 2014; 47: 79-91.
27. Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Parpa E, Kalaidopoulou O, Smyrniotis V, Vlahos L,. The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30, version 3.0) in terminally ill cancer patients under palliative care: validity and reliability in a Hellenic sample. Int J Cancer 2001; 94: 135-139.
28. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al,. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer I 1993; 85: 365-376.
29. Watson M, Greer S, Young J, Inayat Q, Burgess C, Robertson C,. Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale. Psychol Med 1988; 18: 203-209.
30. Mystakidou K, Watson M, Tsilika E, et al,. Psychometric analyses of the Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) Scale in a Greek palliative care unit. Psycho-Oncology 2005; 14: 16-24.
31. Watson M, Homewood J,. Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale: psychometric properties in a large cancer cohort. Psycho-Oncology 2008; 17: 1146-1151.
32. Hayes AF,. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. White paper, 2012; retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
33. Viera AJ, Garrett JM,. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005; 37: 360-363.
34. Carver CS, Antoni M,. Finding benefit in breast cancer during the year after diagnosis predicts better adjustment 5 to 8 years after diagnosis. Health Psychol 2004; 23: 595-598.
35. Hack TF, Degner LF,. Coping responses following breast cancer diagnosis predict psychological adjustment three years later. Psycho-Oncology 2004; 13: 235-247.
36. Ajzen I,. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec 1991; 50: 179-211.
37. Chaitchik S, Kreitler S, Shaked S, Schwarz I, Rosin S,. Doctor-patient communication in a cancer ward. J Cancer Educ 1992; 7: 41-54.
38. Trudel JG, Leduc N, Dumont S,. Perceived communication between physicians and breast cancer patients as a predicting factor of patients' health-related quality of life: a longitudinal analysis. Psycho-Oncology 2014; 23: 531-538.