Nanofibrillar cellulose from Posidonia oceanica: Properties and morphological features

Industrial Crops and Products

Volumn 72, Issue , 2015, Pages 97-106

  Bettaieb, F ^a,b,c   Khiari, R ^a,b,c   Dufresne, A ^b,c   Mhenni, M F ^a   Putaux, J L ^d   Boufi, S ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONASTIR   (Tunisia)

^b UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d CENTRE DE RECHERCHES SUR LES MACROMOLÉCULES VÉGÉTALES CERMAV CNRS   (France)

^e Faculté des Sciences de Sfax   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

Mechanical properties; Polymer matrix composite; Posidonia oceanica balls and leaves

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; DYNAMIC MECHANICAL ANALYSIS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; NANOCOMPOSITE FILMS; PULP MATERIALS;

ACRYLIC LATEXES; DYNAMIC MECHANICAL ANALYSIS (DMA); HIGH PRESSURE HOMOGENIZER; MEDITERRANEAN SEA; MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES; NANOFIBRILLAR CELLULOSE; POSIDONIA OCEANICA; RHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIORS;

POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES;

CELLULOSE; COMPOSITE; FILM; GEL; HIGH PRESSURE; MORPHOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POLYMER; RHEOLOGY; SEAGRASS;

MEDITERRANEAN SEA;

POSIDONIA OCEANICA;

EID: 84937814218     PISSN: 09266690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.12.060     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Abe K., Yano H. Comparison of the characteristics of cellulose microfibril aggregates of wood, rice straw and potato tuber. Cellulose 2009, 16(6):1017-1023.
2. Abe K., Iwamoto S., Yano H. Obtaining cellulose nanofibers with a uniform width of 15nm from wood. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8(10):3276-3278.
3. Abrantes S., Amaral M.E., Costa A.P., Duarte A.P. Cynara cardunculus L. alkaline pulps: alternative fibres for paper and paperboard production. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:2873-2878.
4. Aguir C., Mhenni M.F. Experimental study on carboxymethylation of cellulose extracted from Posidonia oceanica. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 98:1808-1816.
5. Aguir C., Mhenni M.F. Removal of basic blue 41 from aqueous solution by carboxymethylated Posidonia oceanica. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 103:1215-1225.
6. Alemdar A., Sain M. Biocomposites from wheat straw nanofibers: morphology, thermal and mechanical properties. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68:557-565.
7. Alila S., Besbes I., Vilar M.R., Mutjé P., Boufi S. Non-woody plants as raw materials for production of microfibrillated cellulose (NFC): a comparative study. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 41(1):250-259.
8. Andresen M., Johansson L.S., Tanem B.S., Stenius P. Properties and characterization of hydrophobized nanofibrillar cellulose. Cell 2006, 13:665-677.
9. Andresen M., Stenius P. Water-in-oil emulsions stabilized by hydrophobized nanofibrillar cellulose. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 2007, 28:837-844.
10. Antunes A., Amaral E., Belgacem M.N. Cynara cardunculus L.: chemical composition and Soda-Anthraquinone cooking. Ind. Crops Prod. 2000, 12:85-91.
11. Belgacem M.N., Zid M., Nicolski S.N., Obolenskaya A.V. Study of the chemical composition of alpha from Tunisia. Chim. Technol. Drev. Mej. Sbor. Trud. 1986, 8:111-114.
12. Bendahou A., Habibi Y., Kaddami H., Dufresne A. Physico-chemical characterization of palm from Phoenix dactylifera-L, P reparation of cellulose whiskers and natural rubber-based nanocomposites. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2009, 3:81-90.
13. Bendahou A., Kaddami H., Dufresne A. Investigation on the effect of cellulosic nanoparticles' morphology on the properties of natural rubber based nanocomposites. Eur. Polym. J. 2010, 46(4):609-620.
14. Benhamou K., Dufresne A., Magnin A., Mortha G., Kaddami H. Control of size and viscoelastic properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from palm tree by varying the TEMPO-mediated oxidation time. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 99:74-83.
15. Besbes I., Rei Vilar M., Boufi S. Nanofibrillated cellulose from alfa, eucalyptus and pine fibres: preparation, characteristics and reinforcing potential. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86:1198-1206.
16. Besbes I., Alila S., Boufi S. Nanofibrillated cellulose from TEMPO-oxidized eucalyptus fibres: effect of the carboxyl content. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84:975-983.
17. Bhattacharya D., Germinario L.T., Winter W.T. Isolation: preparation and characterization of cellulose microfibers obtained from bagasse. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 73:371-377.
18. Boufi S., Gandini A. Triticale crop residue: a cheap material for high performance nanofibrillated cellulose. RSC Adv. 2015, 5:3141-3151.
19. Bruce D.M., Hobson R.N., Farrent J.W., Hepworth D.G. High-performance composites from low-cost plant primary cell walls. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2005, 36:1486-1493.
20. Chaker A., Mutjé P., Rei Vilar M., Boufi S. Agriculture crop residues as a source for the production of nanofibrillated cellulose with low energy demand. Cellulose 2014, 21:4247-4259.
21. Chaker A., Alila S., Mutjé P., Rei Vilar M., Boufi S. Key role of the hemicellulose content and the cell morphology on the nanofibrillation effectiveness of cellulose pulps. Cellulose 2014, 20:2863-2875.
22. Chakraborty A., Sain M., Kortschot M. Cellulose microfibrals: a novel method of preparation using high shear refining and cryocrushing. Holzforschung 2005, 59:102-107.
23. Chia C.H., Zakaria S., Nguyen K.L., Abdullah M. Utilisation of unbleached kenaf fibres for the preparation of magnetic paper. Ind. Crops Prod. 2008, 28(3):333-339.
24. Cordeiro N., Belgacem M.N., Torres I.C., Mourad J.C.V.P. Chemical composition and pulping of banana pseudo-stems. Ind. Crops Prod. 2004, 19:147-154.
25. Dinand E., Chanzy H., Vignon M.R. Parenchymal cell cellulose from sugar beet pulp: preparation and properties. Cellulose 1996, 3:183-188.
26. Douissa N., Bergaoui L., Mansouri S., Khiari R., Mhenni M.F. Macroscopic and microscopic studies of methylene blue sorption onto extracted celluloses from Posidonia oceanica. Ind.Crops Prod. 2013, 45:106-113.
27. Dinand E., Chanzy H., Vignon R.M. Suspensions of cellulose microfibrils from sugar beet pulp. Food Hydrocolloids 1999, 13(3):275-283.
28. Djafari Petroudy S.R., Syverud K., Chinga-Carrasco G., Ghasemain A., Resalati H. Effects of bagasse microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyacrylamide on key properties of bagasse paper. Carbohydre Polym. 2014, 99:311-318.
29. Dufresne A., Dupeyre D., Vignon M.R. Cellulose microfibrils from potatotuber cells: processing and characterization of starch-cellulose microfibril composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000, 76:2080-2092.
30. Dufresne A., Cavaille J.Y., Vignon M.R. Mechanical behavior of sheets prepared from sugar beet cellulose microfibrils. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 64:1185-1194.
31. Dufresne A. Nanocellulose From Nature to High-Performance Tailored Materials 2012, de Gruyter.
32. Dufresne A. Processing of polymer nanocomposites reinforced with polysaccharide nanocrystals. Mol. J. 2010, 15:4111-4128.
33. Dutt D., Upadhyaya J.S., Malik R.S., Tyagi C.H. Studies on the pulp and papermaking characteristics of some Indian non-woody fibrous raw materials. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2005, 39(1-2):115-128.
34. Dutt D., Upadhyaya J.S., Tyagi C.H., Kumar A., Lal M. Studies on Ipomea carnea and Cannabis sativa as an alternative pulp blend for softwood: an optimization of kraft delignification process. Ind. Crops Prod. 2008, 28:128-136.
35. Erkisen O., Syverud K., Gregersen O. The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper. Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 2008, 23:299-304.
36. Fukuzumi H., Saito T., Iwata T., Kumamoto Y., Isogai A. Transparent and high gas barrier films of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10(1):162-165.
37. Ganikhanov F., Carrasco S., Sunney Xie X. Broadly tunable dual-wavelength light source for coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering microscopy. Opt. Lett. 2006, 31(9):1292-1294.
38. Gezguez I., Dridi-Dhaouadi S., Mhenni F. Sorption of yellow 59 on Posidonia oceanica, a non-conventional biosorbent: comparison with activated carbons. Ind. Crops Prod. 2009, 29(1):197-204.
39. Gousse C., Chanzy H., Cerrada M.L., Fleury E. Surface silylation of cellulose microfibrils: preparation and rheological properties. Polymer 2004, 45:1569-1575.
40. Habibi Y., Mahrouz M., Vignon M.R. Nanofibrillar cellulose from the peel of prickly pear fruits. Food Chem. 2009, 115:423-429.
41. Habibi Y., Vignon M.R. Optimization of cellouronic acid synthesis by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of cellulose III from sugar beet pulp. Cellulose 2008, 15:177-185.
42. Hassan M.L., Mathew A.P., Hassan E.A., El-Wakil N.A., Oksman K. Nanofibers from bagasse and rice straw process optimization and properties. Wood Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:193-205.
43. Hassan M.L., Mathew A.P., Hassan E.A., Oksman K. Effect of pretreatment of bagasse pulp on properties of isolated nanofibers and nanopaper sheets. Wood Fiber Sci. 2010, 43:1-15.
44. Hedjazi S., Kordsahia O., Patt R., Latibrai A.J., Tschirner U. Anthraquinone (AS/AQ) pulping of wheat straw and totally chlorine free (TCF) bleaching of pulps. Ind. Crops Prod. 2008, 62(2):142-148.
45. Herrick F.W., Casebier R.L., Hamilton J.K., Sandberg K.R. Nanofibrillar cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1983, 37:797-813.
46. Imai T., Putaux J.L., Sugiyama J. Geometric phase analysis of lattice images from algal cellulose microfibrils. Polymer 2003, 44:1871-1879.
47. Isogai A., Usuda M., Kato T., Uryu T., Atalla R.H. Solid-state CP/MAS carbon-13 NMR study of cellulose polymorphs. Macromolecules 1989, 22(7):3168-3172.
48. Iwamoto S., Abe K., Yano H. The effect of hemicelluloses on wood pulp nanofibrillation and nanofiber network characteristics. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9:1022-1026.
49. Iwamoto S., Nakagaito A.N., Yano H., Nogi M. Optically transparent composites reinforced with plant fibers-based nanofibers. Appl. Phys. A-Mater. 2005, 81:1109-1112.
50. Janardhnan S., Sain M. Isolation of cellulose microfibrils-an enzymatic approach. Bioresources 2006, 1:176-188.
51. Jang J.H., Lee S.H., Endo T., Kim N.H. Characteristics of microfibrillated cellulosic fibers and paper sheets from Korean white pine. Wood Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:925-937.
52. Jonoobi M., Khazaeian A., Tahir P.M., Azry S.S., Oksman K. Characteristics of cellulose nanofibers isolated from rub-berwood and empty fruit bunches of oil palm using chemo-mechanical process. Cellulose 2011, 18:1085-1095.
53. Kalia S., Boufi S., Celli A., Kango S. Nanofibrillated cellulose: surface modification and potential applications. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2014, 292:5-31.
54. Khiari R., Mhenni M.F., Belgacem M.N., Mauret E. Chemical composition and pulping of date palm rachis and Posidonia oceanica - a comparison with other wood and non-wood fibre sources. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:775-780.
55. Khiari R., Marrakchi Z., Belgacem M.N., Mauret E., Mhenni M.F. New lignocellulosic fibres-reinforced composite materials: a step forward in the valorisation of the Posidonia oceanica balls. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 71:187-1867.
56. Khiari R., Mauret E., Belgacem M.N., Mhenni F. Tunisian date palm rachis used as an alternative source of fibres for papermaking applications. Bioresources 2011, 6:265-281.
57. Klemm D., Heublein B., Fink H.P., Bohn A. Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44(22):3358-3393.
58. Liu R.G., Yu H., Huang Y. Structure and morphology of cellulose in wheat straw. Cellulose 2005, 12(1):25-34.
59. Malainine M.E., Mahrouz M., Dufresne A. Thermoplastic nanocomposites based on cellulose microfibrils from Opuntia ficus-indica parenchyma cell. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65:1520-1526.
60. Moran J.I., Alvarez V.A., Cyras V.P., Vazquez A. Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cell 2008, 15:149-159.
61. Nakagaito A.N., Yano H. The effect of morphological changes from pulp fiber towards nano-scale fibrillated cellulose on the mechanical properties of high-strength plant fiber based composites. Appl. Phys. A-Mater. Sci. Process. 2004, 78:547-552.
62. Ncibi M.C., Mahjoub B., Seffen M. Studies on the biosorption of textile dyes from aqueous solutions using Posidonia oceanica leaf sheath fibres. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2006, 24(6):461-473.
63. Ncibi M.C., Mahjoub B., Seffen M. Biosorption of Phenol onto Posidonia oceanica seagrass in batch systems: equilibrium and kinetic modelling. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 84(4):495-500.
64. Ncibi M.C., Altenor S., Seffen M., Brouers F., Gaspard S. Modelling single compound adsorption onto porous and non-porous sorbents using deformed Weibull exponential isotherm. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 145(2):196-292.
65. Oh S.Y., Yoo D.I., Shin Y., Kim H.C., Kim H.Y., Chung Y.S., Park W.H., Youk J.H. Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340(15):2376-2391.
66. Rezayati Charani P., Dehghani-Firouzabadi M., Afra E., Blademo Å., Naderi A., Lindström T. Production of microfibrillated cellulose from unbleached kraft pulp of kenaf and Scotch pine and its effect on the properties of hardwood kraft microfibrillated cellulose paper. Cellulose 2013, 20:2559-2567.
67. Rondeau-Mouro C., Bouchet B., Pontoire B., Robert P., Mazoyer J., Buléon A. Structural features and potential texturising properties of lemon and maize cellulose microfibrils. Carbohydr. Polym. 2003, 53:241-252.
68. Rosli W., Leh W.D., Zainuddin C.P., Tanaka Z. Optimisation of soda pulping variables for preparation of dissolving pulps from oil palm fibre. Holzforschung 2003, 57(1):106-113.
69. Saito T., Nishiyama Y., Putaux J.L., Vignon M., Isogai A. Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7:1687-1691.
70. Segal L., Creely J.J., Martin A.E., Conrad C.M. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text. Res. J. 1959, 29:786-794.
71. Siqueira G., Tadokoro S.K., Mathew A.P., Oksman K. Carrot nanofibers and nanocomposites applications, presented at the 7th International Symposiumon. Natural Polymers and Composites September 7-10 2010.
72. Siqueira G., Tapin-Lingua S., Bras J., Da Silva Perez D., Dufresne A. Morphological investigation of nano-particles obtained from combined mechanical shearing, and enzymatic and acid hydrolysis of sisal fibers. Cellulose 2010, 17(6):1147-1158.
73. Siró I., Plackett D. Characterization of nanofibrillar cellulose (NFC) films made of different types of raw material. Nordic Polymer Days, 11-13 June 2008.
74. Stenstad P., Andresen M., Tanem B.S., Stenius P. Chemical surface modifications of nanofibrillar cellulose. Cell 2008, 15:35-45.
75. Subramanian R., Knononov A., Kang T., Paltakari J., Paulapura H. Natural cellulosic fibrils. Bioresources 2008, 3:192-203.
76. Syverud K., Stenius P. Strench and barrier properties of NFC films. Cell 2009, 16:75-85.
77. Turbak A.F., Snyder F.W., Sandberg K.R. Nanofibrillar cellulose a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1983, 37:815-827.
78. Wang B., Mohini S. Isolation of nanofibers from soybean source and their reinforcing capability on synthetic polymers. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2007, 67:2521-2527.
79. Winuprasith T., Suphantharika M. Microfibrillated cellulose from mangosteen (Garcinia Mangostana L.) rind Preparation characterization, and evaluation as an emulsion stabilizer. Food hydrocolloid 2013, 32:383-394.
80. Zhang J., Song H., Lin L., Zhuang J., Pang C., Liu S. Microfibrillated cellulose from bamboo pulp and its properties. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 39:78-83.
81. Zhao H.P., Feng X.Q., Gao H. Ultrasonic technique for extracting nanofibres from nature materials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90:73-112.
82. Zuluaga R., Putaux J.L., Cruz J., Vélez J., Mondragon I., Gañán P. Cellulose microfibrils from banana rachis: effect of alkaline treatments on structural and morphological features. Carbohydr. Polym. 2009, 76(1):51-59.