Topics in constrained and unconstrained ordination

Plant Ecology

Volumn 216, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 683-696

  ter Braak, Cajo J F ^a   Šmilauer, Petr ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Constrained ordination; Data transformation; Experimental design; Interaction; Multivariate analysis; Ordination; Principal response curves

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937765930     PISSN: 13850237     EISSN: 15735052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-014-0356-5     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Baar J, ter Braak CJF (1996) Ectomycorrhizal sporocarp occurrence as affected by manipulation of litter and humus layers in Scots pine stands of different age. Appl Soil Ecol 4:61–73
2. Birks HJB, Line JM, Juggins S, Stevenson AC, ter Braak CJF (1990) Diatoms and pH reconstruction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 327:263–278
3. Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical ecology with R. Use R!. Springer, New York
4. Breslow NE, Clayton DG (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 88:9–25
5. Davies PT, Tso MK-S (1982) Procedures for reduced-rank regression. Appl Stat 31:244–255
6. Eilers PHC, Marx BD (1996) Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties. Stat Sci 11:89–121
7. Engel B, Keen A (1994) A simple approach for the analysis of generalized linear mixed models. Stat Neerl 48:1–22
8. Faith DP, Minchin PR, Belbin L (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69:57–68
9. Frontier S (1976) Étude de la décroissance des valeurs propres dans une analyse en composantes principales: comparaison avec le modèle du bâton brisé. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 25:67–75
10. Goodall DW (1954) Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. III. An essay in the use of factor analysis. Aust J Bot 1:39–63
11. Goodall DW, Johnson RW (1982) Non-linear ordination in several dimensions. A maximum likelihood approach. Vegetatio 48:197–208
12. Goodall DW, Johnson RW (1987) Maximum-likelihood ordination—some improvements and further tests. Vegetatio 73:3–12
13. Gower JC (1966) Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325–338
14. Graffelman J (2001) Quality statistics in canonical correspondence analysis. Environmetrics 12(5):485–497
15. Graffelman J, Tuft R (2004) Site scores and conditional biplots in canonical correspondence analysis. Environmetrics 15(1):67–80. doi:10.1002/env.629
16. Greenacre MJ (1984) Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press, London
17. Greenacre M (2012) Fuzzy coding in constrained ordinations. Ecology 94(2):280–286. doi:10.1890/12-0981.1
18. Greenacre MJ (2013) The contributions of rare objects in correspondence analysis. Ecology 94(1):241–249. doi:10.1890/11-1730.1
19. Guisan A, Weiss S, Weiss A (1999) GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecol 143(1):107–122. doi:10.1023/a:1009841519580
20. Heiser WJ (1987) Joint ordination of species and sites: the unfolding technique. In: Legendre P, Legendre L (eds) Developments in numerical ecology. Springer, Berlin, pp 189–224
21. Hill MO (1973) Reciprocal averaging: an eigenvector method of ordination. J Ecol 61:237–249
22. Hill MO (1979) TWINSPAN—a FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Cornell University, Ithaca
23. Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58
24. Ihm P, van Groenewoud H (1984) Correspondence analysis and Gaussian ordination. Compstat Lect 3:5–60
25. Jackson DA, Somers KM (1991) The ups and downs of detrended correspondence analysis. Am Nat 137:704–712
26. Jamil T, ter Braak CJF (2013) Generalized linear mixed models can detect unimodal species-environment relationships. PeerJ 1:e95. doi:10.7717/peerj.95
27. Johnson KW, Altman NS (1999) Canonical correspondence analysis as an approximation to Gaussian ordination. Environmetrics 10(1):39–52. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-095x(199901/02)10:1<39:aid-env334>3.0.co;2-3
28. Johnson RW, Goodall DW (1979) A maximum likelihood approach to non-linear ordination. Vegetatio 41:133–142
29. Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi:10.2277/0521475740
30. Juggins S, Birks HJB (2012) Quantitative environmental reconstructions from biological data. In: Birks HJB, Lotter AF, Juggins S, Smol JP (eds) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments, vol 5. Springer, New York, pp 431–494
31. Kruskal JB (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1–27
32. Legendre P, Anderson MJ (1999) Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multi-species responses in multi-factorial ecological experiments. Ecol Monogr 69:1–24
33. Legendre P, Gallagher ED (2001) Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271–280
34. Legendre L, Legendre P (2012) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam
35. Legendre P, Oksanen J, ter Braak CJF (2011) Testing the significance of canonical axes in redundancy analysis. Methods Ecol Evol 2(3):269–277. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00078.x
36. Martins TG, Simpson D, Lindgren F, Rue H (2013) Bayesian computing with INLA: new features. Comput Stat Data Anal 67:68–83
37. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London
38. McCune B (1997) Influence of noisy environmental data on canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 78:2617–2623
39. Minchin PR (1987) An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 67:1167–1179
40. Montgomery DC, Peck EA (1982) Introduction to linear regression analysis. Wiley, New York
41. O’Hara RB, Kotze DJ (2010) Do not log-transform count data. Methods Ecol Evol 1(2):118–122. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00021.x
42. Oksanen J, Tonteri T (1995) Rate of compositional turnover along gradients and total gradient length. J Veg Sci 6(6):815–824. doi:10.2307/3236395
43. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, STevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 20-9 http://www.cranr-projectorg/
44. Palmer MW (1993) Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215–2230
45. Palmer JA (2014) A glossary of ordination-related terms. http://www.ordination.okstate.edu/glossary.htm (last accessed 30 January 2014)
46. Peet RK, Knox RG, Case JS, Allen RB (1988) Putting things in order: the advantages of detrended correspondence analysis. Am Nat 131(6):924–934. doi:10.2307/2461824
47. Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87(10):2614–2625
48. Rao CR (1964) The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhya A 26:329–358
49. Schnabel SK, van Eeuwijk FA, Eilers PHC (2012) Modeling latent curves for genotype by environment interaction. In: Komárek A, Nagy S (eds) Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Statistical Modelling, Prague
50. Šmilauer P, Lepš J (2014) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using Canoco 5, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
51. ter Braak CJF (1985) Correspondence analysis of incidence and abundance data: properties in terms of a unimodal response model. Biometrics 41:859–873
52. ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179
53. ter Braak CJF (1987a) The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69:69–77
54. ter Braak CJF (1987b) Unimodal models to relate species to environment. Agricultural mathematics Group, Wageningen. http://edepot.wur.nl/201452
55. ter Braak CJF (1994) Canonical community ordination. Part I: basic theory and linear methods. Écoscience 1:127–140
56. ter Braak CJF (2014) History of canonical correspondence analysis. In: Blasius J, Greenacre M (eds) Visualization and verbalization of Data. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London, pp 61–75
57. ter Braak CJF, Barendregt LG (1986) Weighted averaging of species indicator values: its efficiency in environmental calibration. Math Biosci 78:57–72
58. ter Braak CJF, Looman CWN (1986) Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model. Vegetatio 65:3–11
59. ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2012) Canoco reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination, version 5.0. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca
60. ter Braak CJF, van Dam H (1989) Inferring pH from diatoms: a comparison of old and new calibration methods. Hydrobiologia 178:209–223
61. van den Brink P, ter Braak C (1998) Multivariate analysis of stress in experimental ecosystems by principal response curves and similarity analysis. Aquat Ecol 32(2):163–178. doi:10.1023/a:1009944004756
62. van den Brink PJ, ter Braak CJF (1999) Principal response curves: analysis of time-dependent multivariate responses of a biological community to stress. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:138–148
63. van den Wollenberg AL (1977) Redundancy analysis. An alternative for canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 42:207–219
64. Walker SC, Jackson DA (2011) Random-effects ordination: describing and predicting multivariate correlations and co-occurrences. Ecol Monogr 81(4):635–663. doi:10.1890/11-0886.1
65. Wang Y, Naumann U, Wright ST, Warton DI (2012) mvabund– an R package for model-based analysis of multivariate abundance data. Methods Ecol Evol 3(3):471–474. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00190.x
66. Warton DI (2005) Many zeros does not mean zero inflation: comparing the goodness-of-fit of parametric models to multivariate abundance data. Environmetrics 16(3):275–289. doi:10.1002/env.702
67. Warton DI, Wright ST, Wang Y (2012) Distance-based multivariate analyses confound location and dispersion effects. Methods Ecol Evol 3(1):89–101. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00127.x
68. Warwick RM, Clarke KR, Suharsono (1990) A statistical analysis of coral community responses to the 19823 El Nino in the Thousand Islands, Indonesia, 171179. Coral Reefs 8:171–179
69. Yee TW (2004) A new technique for maximum-likelihood canonical Gaussian ordination. Ecol Monogr 74(4):685–701
70. Yee TW (2006) Constrained additive ordination. Ecology 87(1):203–213. doi:10.1890/05-0283
71. Zhang Y, Thas O (2012) Constrained ordination analysis in the presence of zero inflation. Stat Model 12(6):463–485. doi:10.1177/1471082x12460129
72. Zhu M, Hastie TJ, Walther G (2005) Constrained ordination analysis with flexible response functions. Ecol Model 187(4):524–536
73. Zuur AF, Leno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2008) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York