Temporal Trends in Quality of Life Outcomes after Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve (PARTNER) Trial Substudy

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 338-346

  Gada, Hemal ^a   Kirtane, Ajay J ^b   Wang, Kaijun ^c   Lei, Yang ^c   Magnuson, Elizabeth ^c   Reynolds, Matthew R ^d,e   Williams, Mathew R ^f   Kodali, Susheel ^b   Vahl, Torsten P ^b   Arnold, Suzanne V ^c   Leon, Martin B ^b   Thourani, Vinod ^g   Szeto, Wilson Y ^h   Cohen, David J ^c  

^a ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Department of Medicine   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d LAHEY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e HARVARD CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

aortic valve; follow up studies; quality of life; transapical; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE ASSESSMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KANSAS CITY CARDIOMYOPATHY QUESTIONNAIRE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHORT FORM 12; TRANSAPICAL TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREND STUDY; AORTA VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PSYCHOLOGY; REGISTER; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGISTRIES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84937718489     PISSN: 19417713     EISSN: 19417705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001335     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Gotoda Y, Kambara N, Sakai T, Kishi Y, Kodama K, Koyama T. The morbidity, time course and predictive factors for persistent post-thoracotomy pain. Eur J Pain. 2001; 5: 89-96. doi: 10.1053/eujp.2001.0225.
2. Katz J, Jackson M, Kavanagh BP, Sandler AN. Acute pain after thoracic surgery predicts long-term post-thoracotomy pain. Clin J Pain. 1996; 12: 50-55.
3. Richardson J, Sabanathan S, Shah R. Post-thoracotomy spirometric lung function: the effect of analgesia. A review. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1999; 40: 445-456.
4. Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Wang K, Thourani VH, Williams M, Zajarias A, Rihal CS, Brown DL, Smith CR, Leon MB, Cohen DJ; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Health-related quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: results from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) Trial (Cohort A). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 548-558. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.075.
5. Dewey TM, Bowers B, Thourani VH, Babaliaros V, Smith CR, Leon MB, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Miller DC, Teirstein PS, Tyner J, Brown DL, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Williams MR, George I, Kirtane AJ, Bavaria JE, Mack MJ. Transapical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: results from the nonrandomized continued access cohort of the PARTNER trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 96: 2083-2089. doi: 10.1016/j. athoracsur.2013.05.093.
6. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Brown DL, Block PC, Guyton RA, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Douglas PS, Petersen JL, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock S; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 1597-1607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232.
7. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Williams M, Dewey T, Kapadia S, Babaliaros V, Thourani VH, Corso P, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock SJ; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 2187-2198. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103510.
8. Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, Spertus JA. Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 1245-1255.
9. Arnold SV, Spertus JA, Lei Y, Allen KB, Chhatriwalla AK, Leon MB, Smith CR, Reynolds MR, Webb JG, Svensson LG, Cohen DJ. Use of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire for monitoring health status in patients with aortic stenosis. Circ Heart Fail. 2013; 6: 61-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.970053.
10. Spertus J, Peterson E, Conard MW, Heidenreich PA, Krumholz HM, Jones P, McCullough PA, Pina I, Tooley J, Weintraub WS, Rumsfeld JS; Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium. Monitoring clinical changes in patients with heart failure: a comparison of methods. Am Heart J. 2005; 150: 707-715. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.12.010.
11. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996; 34: 220-233.
12. Wyrwich KW, Spertus JA, Kroenke K, Tierney WM, Babu AN, Wolinsky FD; Heart Disease Expert Panel. Clinically important differences in health status for patients with heart disease: an expert consensus panel report. Am Heart J. 2004; 147: 615-622. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.039.
13. EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of healthrelated quality of life. Health Policy. 1990; 16: 199-208.
14. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005; 43: 203-220.
15. Alli OO, Booker JD, Lennon RJ, Greason KL, Rihal CS, Holmes DR Jr. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: assessing the learning curve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 72-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.09.014.
16. D'Ancona G, Pasic M, Unbehaun A, Dreysse S, Drews T, Buz S, Kukucka M, Mladenow A, Hetzer R, Seifert B. Transapical aortic valve implantation: learning curve with reduced operating time and radiation exposure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 97: 43-47. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.070.
17. Lichtenstein KM, Kim JM, Gao M, Soon JL, Cheung A, Wood D, Webb JG, Ye J. Surgical risk algorithm as a measure of successful adoption of transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 147: 1524-1528. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.033.
18. Arnold SV, Reynolds MR, Lei Y, Magnuson EA, Kirtane AJ, Kodali SK, Zajarias A, Thourani VH, Green P, Rodés-Cabau J, Beohar N, Mack MJ, Leon MB, Cohen DJ; PARTNER Investigators. Predictors of poor outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve) trial. Circulation. 2014; 129: 2682-2690. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007477.
19. Arnold SV, Spertus JA, Lei Y, Green P, Kirtane AJ, Kapadia S, Thourani VH, Herrmann HC, Beohar N, Zajarias A, Mack MJ, Leon MB, Cohen DJ. How to define a poor outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: conceptual framework and empirical observations from the placement of aortic transcatheter valve (PARTNER) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013; 6: 591-597. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000354.
20. Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Lei Y, Leon MB, Smith CR, Svensson LG, Webb JG, Babaliaros VC, Bowers BS, Fearon WF, Herrmann HC, Kapadia S, Kodali SK, Makkar RR, Pichard AD, Cohen DJ; Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) Investigators. Health-related quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2011; 124: 1964-1972. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.040022.
21. Kim CA, Rasania SP, Afilalo J, Popma JJ, Lipsitz LA, Kim DH. Functional status and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 160: 243-254. doi: 10.7326/M13-1316.
22. Bona V, Khawaja MZ, Bapat V, Young C, Hancock J, Redwood S, Fusari M, Thomas M. Early and late changes in quality of life following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the transfemoral and transapical approaches [Epub ahead of print]. EuroIntervention. 2014.
23. Grossi EA, Zakow PK, Ribakove G, Kallenbach K, Ursomanno P, Gradek CE, Baumann FG, Colvin SB, Galloway AC. Comparison of post-operative pain, stress response, and quality of life in port access vs. standard sternotomy coronary bypass patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999; 16(suppl 2): S39-S42.
24. Amat-Santos IJ, Dumont E, Villeneuve J, Doyle D, Rheault M, Lavigne D, Lemieux J, St-Pierre A, Mok M, Urena M, Nombela-Franco L, Blackburn S, Simon M, Bourgault C, Carrasco JL, Pibarot P, Côté M, Delarochellière R, Cohen DJ, Rodés-Cabau J. Effect of thoracic epidural analgesia on clinical outcomes following transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart. 2012; 98: 1583-1590. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302185.
25. Meyer CG, Frick M, Lotfi S, Altiok E, Koos R, Kirschfink A, Lehrke M, Autschbach R, Hoffmann R. Regional left ventricular function after transapical vs. transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation analysed by cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 15: 1168-1176. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu103.
26. Lardizabal JA, O'Neill BP, Desai HV, Macon CJ, Rodriguez AP, Martinez CA, Alfonso CE, Bilsker MS, Carillo RG, Cohen MG, Heldman AW, O'Neill WW, Williams DB. The transaortic approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: initial clinical experience in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 2341-2345. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.076.
27. Thourani VH, Gunter RL, Neravetla S, Block P, Guyton RA, Kilgo P, Lerakis S, Devireddy C, Leshnower B, Mavromatis K, Stewart J, Simone A, Keegan P, Nguyen TC, Merlino J, Babaliaros V. Use of transaortic, transapical, and transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 96: 1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/j. athoracsur.2013.05.068.
28. Cohen DJ, Reynolds MR. Interpreting the results of cost-effectiveness studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 2119-2126. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.018.
29. Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Lei Y, Wang K, Vilain K, Li H, Walczak J, Pinto DS, Thourani VH, Svensson LG, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Satler LE, Bavaria J, Smith CR, Leon MB, Cohen DJ; PARTNER Investigators. Costeffectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: results of the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial (Cohort A). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 2683-2692. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.018.