Effect of TiO2nanoparticles on tensile strength of dental acrylic resins

Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 197-203

  Shirkavad, Saeed ^a   Moslehifard, Elnaz ^b  

^a URMIA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Acrylic resins; Materials testing; Metal nanoparticles; Tensile strength

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937705180     PISSN: 2008210X     EISSN: 20082118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5681/joddd.2014.036     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Price CA. A history of dental polymers. J Prosthodont 1994;8:47-54.
2. Soh MS, Sellinger A, Yap AU. J Dental Nanocomposites 2006;24:373-81.
3. Kanie T, Arikawa H, Fujii K, Inoue K. Physical and mechanical properties of PMMA resins containing gamma-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxy-silane. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:166-71.
4. Vallo CI, Abraham GA, Cuadrado TR, San Román J. Influence of cross-linked PMMA beads on the mechanical behav-ior of self-curing acrylic cements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;70:407-16.
5. Bettencourt AF, Neves CB, de Almeida MS, Pinheiro LM, Oliveira SA, Lopes LP, et al. Biodegradation of acrylic based resins:a review. Dent Mater J 2010;26:171
6. Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1995;6:302-18.
7. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomate-rials 2007;28:3757-85.
8. Rosoff, M. Nano-surface Chemistry. Marcel Dekker Inc 2002;7:123-35.
9. Nejatian T, Johnson A, Van Noort R. Reinforcement of denture base resin. Advances in Science and Technology 2006;49:124-9.
10. Saujanya C, Radhakrishnan S. Structure development and crystallization behavior of PP/nanoparticulate composite. J Polymer 2001;42:6723-31.
11. Yu SH, Lee Y, Oh S, Cho HW, Oda Y, Bae JM. Reinforcing effects of different fibers on denture base resin based on the fiber type, concentration, and combination. Dent Mater J 2012;31:1039-46.
12. Berrong JM, Weed RM, Young JM. Fracture resistance f Kevlar-reinforced poly (methyl methacrylate) resin:a pre-liminary study. Int J Prosthodont1990;3:391-5.
13. Ladizesky NH, Cheng YY, Chow TW, Ward IM. Acrylic resin reinforced with chopped high performance polyethylene fiber properties and denture construction. Dent Mater J 1993;9:128-35.
14. Ekstrand K, Ruyter IE, Wellendorf H. Carbon/graphite fiber reinforced poly (methyl methacrylate):properties under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:1065-80.
15. Kanie T, Arikawa H, Fujii K. Impact strength of acrylic denture base resin reinforced with woven glass fiber. Dent Mater J 2003;22:30-8.
16. Kanie T, Arikawa H, Fujii K, Ban S. Deformation and flexural properties of denture base polymer reinforced with glass fiber sheet. Dent Mater J 2005;24:297-303.
17. Uzun G, Hersek N, Tinçer T. Effect of five woven fiber rein-forcements on the impact and transverse strength of a denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:616-20.
18. Capaccio G, Ward IM. Properties of ultra-high-modulus linear polyethylene. Nature Phys Sci 1973;243:143-5.
19. Ward IM. The preparation, structure and properties of ultra-high modulus flexible polymers. Adv Polymer Sci 1985;70:1-70.
20. Reijnders L. The release of TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles from nanocomposites. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2009;94:873-6.
21. Chatterjee A. Properties improvement of PMMA using nanoTiO2. J App Poly Sc 2010;118:2890-7.
22. Chatterjee A. Effect of nanoTiO2 addition on poly (methyl methacrylate): an exciting nanocomposite. J App Poly Sc 2010;116:3396-407.
23. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Material, 11th ed. St. Louis: The CV Mosby Co; 2002. p. 639-57.
24. Cullity, BD. Elements of X-ray Diffraction, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. INC ReadingMA 1978;15:235-265.
25. Nawaz Q, Rharbi Y. Effects of the nanomechanical properties of polymer nanoparticles on crack patterns during drying of colloidal suspensions. Macromolecules 2008;41:5928-33.
26. Sodagar A, Bahador A, Khalil S, Shahroudi AS, Kassaee MZ. The effect of TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles on flexural strength of poly (methyl methacrylate) acrylic resins. J Prosth. Res 2013;57:15-9.
27. Xia Y, Zhang F, Xie H, Gu N. Nanoparticle-reinforced resin-based dental composites. J Dent 2008;36:450-5.
28. Acosta-Torres LS, López-Marín LM, Núñez-Anita RE, Hernández-Padrón G, Castaño VM. Biocompatible of metal-oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnology improvement of con-ventional prosthetic acrylic resins. Journal of Nanomaterials 2011;2011:941561, 8 pages.
29. Compagnoni MA, Barbosa DB, de Souza RF, Pero AC. The effect of polymerization cycles on porosity of microwave-processed denture base resin. J Prosthetic Dent 2004;91:281-5.
30. Chatterjee, A. Effect of nanoTiO2 addition on poly(methyl methacrylate): an exciting nanocomposite. J Appl Polym Sci 2010;116:3396-407.
31. Sun J, Forster AM, Johnson PM, Eidelman N, Quinn G, Schumacher G, et al. Improving performance of dental resins by adding titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Dental Materials 2011;27:972-82.
32. 2 photo-catalyst. Dent Mater J 2007;26:437-44.