The continued retreat of non-profit housing providers in the Netherlands

Journal of Housing and the Built Environment

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 277-295

  Nieboer, Nico ^a   Gruis, Vincent ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Non profit; Organisational strategy; Social housing; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

AFFORDABLE HOUSING; HOUSING PROVISION; LOW INCOME POPULATION; NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; SOCIAL HOUSING; STRATEGIC APPROACH; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN HOUSING; URBAN POLICY;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84937696933     PISSN: 15664910     EISSN: 15737772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10901-015-9458-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organisations, theory, management, policy. London: Routledge.
2. Blessing, A. (2012). Magical or monstrous? Hybridity in social housing governance. Housing Studies, 27(2), 189–207.
3. Blessing, A. (2014). Magical or monstrous? Understanding market oriented reforms of social rental housing. Doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
4. Brandsen, T., Cardoso Ribeiro, T., & Farnell, R. (2006). Housing association diversification in Europe; profiles portfolios and strategies. Whitley Village: The REX Group.
5. Brandsen, T., van de Donk, W., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(9/10), 749–765.
6. BZK (2013). Cijfers over Wonen en Bouwen 2013 [Figures about Housing and Building 2013], The Hague: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties [Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations].
7. Clapham, D., & Satsangi, M. (1992). Performance assessment and accountability in British housing management. Policy and Politics, 20(1), 63–74.
8. Czischke, D. (2014), Social housing organizations in England and The Netherlands; Between the state, market and community. Doctoral thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft.
9. Gibb, K. (2002). Trends and change in social housing finance and provision within the European Union. Housing Studies, 17(2), 325–336.
10. Golden, B. R. (1992). The past is the past—Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategies. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 848–860.
11. Gruis, V. (2008). Organisational archetypes for Dutch housing associations. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(6), 1077–1092.
12. Kemp, P. A. (1995). Researching housing management performance. Urban Studies, 32(4–5), 779–790.
13. Kromhout, S., Smeulders, E., & Scheele-Goedhart, J. (2010). Tussen wal en schip; twee deelstudies naar de gevolgen van de 90 % norm [Between the shore and the ship; A study in two parts into the consequences of the 90 % criterion]. Amsterdam: RIGO Research en Advies BV.
14. Malpass, P., & Victory, C. (2010). The modernisation of social housing in England. International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(1), 3–18.
15. Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1978). Organisational strategy, structure and process. New York: McGraw Hill.
16. Milligan, V., Nieboer, N., Hulse, K., & Mullins, D. (2012). The old and the new: Comparing strategic positioning of third sector housing organisations in the Netherlands and Australia. In Paper ENHR conference. Lillehammer, Norway, June, 24–27.
17. Morrison, N. (2013). Meeting the Decent Homes Standard: London housing associations’ asset management s strategies. Urban Studies, 50(12), 2569–2587.
18. Mullins, D. (2006). Exploring change in the housing association sector in England using the Delphi method. Housing Studies, 21(2), 227–251.
19. Mullins, D., Czischke, D., & van Bortel, G. (2012). Exploring the meaning of hybridity and social enterprise in housing organisations. Housing Studies, 27(4), 405–417.
20. Mullins, D., Milligan, V., & Nieboer, N. (2014). Between State and Market—The relationship between non-profit housing organisations and the state in three national contexts. In Paper ISA World Congress of Sociology. Yokohama, Japan, July, 13–19, 2014.
21. Nieboer, N., & Gruis, V. (2011). Terugtrekkende bewegingen in de corporatiesector [Moving back in the housing associations’ sector]. Rooilijn, 44(3), 214–221.
22. Nieboer, N., & Gruis, V. (2012). Corporaties: Koers bepalers of windvaantjes? [Housing associations: Charting the course or going with the wind?]. Real Estate Research Quarterly, 11(2), 6–12.
23. Nieboer, N., & Gruis, V. (2014). Shifting back-changing organisational strategies in Dutch social housing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(1), 1–13.
24. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organisational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Priemus, H. (2010). The credit crunch: Impacts on the housing market and policy responses in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25(1), 95–116.
26. Priemus, H., & Gruis, V. (2011). Social housing and illegal state aid_ The agreement between European commission and Dutch government. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(1), 89–104.
27. Sacranie, H. (2012). Hybridity enacted in a large English housing association: A tale of strategy, culture and community investment. Housing Studies, 27(4), 533–552.
28. Symon, P., & Walker, R. (1995). A consumer perspective on performance indicators: The local housing authority Reports to Tenants regimes in England and Wales. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 13(2), 195–216.
29. Van Overmeeren, A., & Gruis, V. (2011). Asset management of social landlords based on value creation at neighbourhood level. Property Management, 29(2), 181–194.
30. Walker, R. (1994). Putting performance measurement into context: Classifying social housing organisations. Policy and Politics, 22(3), 191–202.
31. Walker, R. (2000). The changing management of social housing: The impact of externalisation and managerialisation. Housing Studies, 15(2), 281–299.