Resident involvement and experience do not affect perioperative complications following robotic prostatectomy

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 793-799

  McMillan, Daniel T ^a,b   Viera, Anthony J ^a,b   Matthews, Jonathan ^a   Raynor, Mathew C ^a   Woods, Michael E ^a   Pruthi, Raj S ^a   Wallen, Eric M ^a   Nielsen, Matthew E ^a,b   Smith, Angela B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b IL   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; Prostatectomy; Residents; Robotics; Surgical training

Indexed keywords

AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UROLOGY;

AGED; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; UROLOGY;

EID: 84937633502     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1356-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Berlinger NT (2006) Robotic surgery—squeezing into tight places. N Engl J Med 354(20):2099–2101
2. Schreuder HW, Wolswijk R, Zweemer RP, Schijven MP, Verheijen RH (2012) Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review. BJOG 119(2):137–149
3. Standard operating practices (SOP’s) for urologic robotic surgery [Internet]: American Urological Association; cited 22 February 2013]. http://www.auanet.org/content/residency/resident-education/SOP-Urologic-Robotic-Surgery.pdf
4. Fulmer B, Rukstalis D, Gorbonos A, Kim E, Talavera F, Schwartz B (2011) Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Medscape Reference: Drugs, Diseases and Procedures [Internet]. 12/1/2011:2/23/2012. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/458677-overview
5. US Department of Health and Human Services (2011) Report to congress: National strategy for quality improvement in health care. [Internet]. March 2011:2/23/2013. http://www.healthcare.gov.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/law/resources/reports/nationalqualitystrategy032011.pdf
6. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Report brief. National Academy Press, Washington
7. National Committee for Quality Assurance (2011) NCQA patient-centered medical home 2011: health care that revolves around you. NCQA, Washington
8. Peikes D, Genevro J, Scholle SH, Torda P (2011) The patient-centered medical home: Strategies to put patients at the center of primary care. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Report No. 11-0029
9. Advani V, Ahad S, Gonczy C, Markwell S, Hassan I (2012) Does resident involvement effect surgical times and complication rates during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis? An analysis of 16,849 cases from the ACS-NSQIP. Am J Surg 203(3):347–351
10. Kiran RP, Ahmed Ali U, Coffey JC, Vogel JD, Pokala N, Fazio VW (2012) Impact of resident participation in surgical operations on postoperative outcomes: National surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 256(3):469–475
11. Reeves JG, Kasirajan K, Veeraswamy RK, Ricotta JJ II, Salam AA, Dodson TF et al (2012) Characterization of resident surgeon participation during carotid endarterectomy and impact on perioperative outcomes. J Vasc Surg 55(1):268–273
12. Gupta PK (2011) Use of NSQIP to study the influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 213(1):196
13. Raval MV, Wang X, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, Bentrem DJ, Dimick JB et al (2011) The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 212(5):889–898
14. Itani KM, DePalma RG, Schifftner T, Sanders KM, Chang BK, Henderson WG et al (2005) Surgical resident supervision in the operating room and outcomes of care in veterans affairs hospitals. Am J Surg 190(5):725–731
15. Kauvar DS, Braswell A, Brown BD, Harnisch M (2006) Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Res 132(2):159–163
16. Davis SS Jr, Husain FA, Lin E, Nandipati KC, Perez S, Sweeney JF (2013) Resident participation in index laparoscopic general surgical cases: impact of the learning environment on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 216(1):96–104
17. Hernandez-Irizarry R, Zendejas B, Ali SM, Lohse CM, Farley DR (2012) Impact of resident participation on laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs: are residents slowing us down? J Surg Educ 69(6):746–752
18. Jordan SW, Mioton LM, Smetona J, Aggarwal A, Wang E, Dumanian GA et al (2013) Resident involvement affects plastic surgery outcomes: An analysis of 10,356 patients from the NSQIP database. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(4):763–773
19. Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2012) The resident as surgeon: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP. J Surg Res 178(1):126–132
20. Matulewicz RS, Pilecki M, Rambachan A, Kim JY, Kundu SD (2014) Impact of resident involvement on urological surgery outcomes: an analysis of 40,000 patients from the ACS NSQIP database. J Urol [Epub ahead of print]
21. American College of Surgeons (2012) ACS NSQIP: User guide for the 2011 participant use data file. Oct 2012
22. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB et al (1998) The department of veterans affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 228(4):491–507
23. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J, Jonasson O, Jones RS, Campbell DA Jr et al (2008) Successful implementation of the department of veterans affairs’ national surgical quality improvement program in the private sector: the patient safety in surgery study. Ann Surg 248(2):329–336
24. Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG et al (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):6–16
25. Davis CL, Pierce JR, Henderson W, Spencer CD, Tyler C, Langberg R et al (2007) Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg 204(4):550–560
26. Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Bianchi M et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 61(4):679–685
27. Kennedy GD, Heise C, Rajamanickam V, Harms B, Foley EF (2009) Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 249(4):596–601
28. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Pritts TA, Ko CY, Esposito TJ (2010) Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals. Surgery 148(4):625–635
29. Babineau TJ, Becker J, Gibbons G, Sentovich S, Hess D, Robertson S et al (2004) The “cost” of operative training for surgical residents. Arch Surg 139(4):366–369
30. Agarwal PK, Sammon J, Bhandari A, Dabaja A, Diaz M, Dusik-Fenton S et al (2011) Safety profile of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a standardized report of complications in 3317 patients. Eur Urol 59(5):684–698