EVIDENCE INFORMED DECISION MAKING: THE USE OF "COLLOQUIAL EVIDENCE" AT NICE

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 138-146

  Sharma, Tarang ^a   Choudhury, Moni ^b   Kaur, Bindweep ^b   Naidoo, Bhash ^b   Garner, Sarah ^b   Littlejohns, Peter ^c   Staniszewska, Sophie ^d  

^a Nordic Cochrane Centre   (Denmark)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

checklist; colloquial evidence; decision making; evidence based healthcare; guidelines; NICE

Indexed keywords

HEALTH; HEALTH CARE;

CHECKLIST; COLLOQUIAL EVIDENCE; EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARES; GUIDELINES; NICE;

DECISION MAKING;

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CHECKLIST; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COLLOQUIAL EVIDENCE; CONSULTATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGRAM APPROPRIATENESS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; DECISION MAKING; METHODOLOGY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARDS; UNITED KINGDOM;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN; STATE MEDICINE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84937630637     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462314000749     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Titchen A, et al. What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice? J Adv Nurs. 2004;47:81-90.
2. Culyer AJ, Lomas J. Deliberative processes and evidence-informed decision making in healthcare: Do they work and how might we know? Evid Policy. 2006;2:357-371.
3. Lomas J, Culyer AJ, McCutcheon C, McAuley L, Law S. Conceptualizing and combining evidence for health system guidance. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2005.
4. Dobrow MJ, Chafe R, Burchett HED, Culyer AJ, Lemieux-Charles L. Designing deliberative methods for combining heterogeneous evidence: A systematic review and qualitative scan. A report to the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2009.
5. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP checklist: Strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:391-399.
6. Oxford dictionaries online. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/ (accessed August 22, 2014).
7. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Weighting up the evidence: Making evidence informed guidance accurate, achievable, and acceptable. A summary of the workshop held on September 29, 2005. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2006.
8. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). http://www.nice.org.uk/(accessed September 12, 2013).
9. Sharma T, Doyle N, Garner S, Naidoo B, Littlejohns P. NICE supporting England and Wales through times of change. Eurohealth. 2011;17:30-31.
10. Littlejohns P, Chalkidou K, Wyatt J, Pearson SD. Assessing evidence and prioritizing clinical and public health guidance recommendations: The NICE way. In: Killoran A, Kelly MP, eds. Evidence-based public health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
11. Staniszewska S, Boardman F, Gunn L, et al. The Warwick Patient Experiences Framework: Patient-based evidence in clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26:151-157.
12. Culyer AJ. Deliberative processes in decisions about health care technologies: Combining different types of evidence, values, algorithms and people. London: Office of Health Economics; 2009.
13. Littlejohns P, Sharma T, Jeong K. Social values and health priority setting in England: "Values" based decision making. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26:363-373.
14. Young JM, Solomon MJ. How to critically appraise an article. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:82-91.
15. Reay CA, Colechin ES, Bousfield DR, Sims AJ. Review of published literature relating to methods for identifying, synthesis and integration of colloquial evidence. Regional Medical Physics Department Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Final Report RSGT405. 2010.
16. Benzies KM, Premji S, Hayden KA, Serrett K. State-of-the-evidence reviews: Advantages and challenges of including grey literature. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2006;3:55-61.
17. Coad J, Hardicre J, Devitt P. How to search for and use 'grey literature' in research. Nurs Times. 2006;102:35-36.
18. Haig A, Dozier M. BEME Guide no 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education-Part 1: Sources of information. Med Teach. 2003;25:352-363.
19. Wilson PR. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: A short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the Internet. BMJ. 2002;324:598-602.
20. Haig A, Dozier M. BEME Guide no 3: Systematic searching for evidence in medical education-Part 2: .Constructing searches. Med. Teach. 2003;25:463-484.
21. The DISCERN Instrument. http://www.discern.org.uk/index.php (accessed October 7, 2014).
22. Rundall TG, Martelli PF, Arroyo L, et al. The informed decisions toolbox: Tools for knowledge transfer and performance improvement. J Healthc Manag. 2007;52:325-341.
23. Shpilko I. Locating grey literature on communication disorders. Med Ref Serv Q. 2005;24:67-80.
24. National Network of Libraries of Medicine. Evaluating health websites. http://nnlm.gov/outreach/consumer/evalsite.html (accessed October 7, 2014).
25. Fournier M. Knowledge mobilization in the context of health technology assessment: An exploratory case study. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012;10:10.
26. Watt A, Hiller J, Braunack-Mayer A, et al. The ASTUTE Health study protocol: Deliberative stakeholder engagements to inform implementation approaches to healthcare disinvestment. Implement Sci. 2012;7:101.
27. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Patient and public involvement policy. http://www.nice.org.uk/media/B41/22/NICE-PPIP-policy---final-for-PDF---June-2011.pdf (accessed September 17, 2013).
28. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Citizen's council. http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/citizenscouncil/citizens-council.jsp (accessed September 17, 2013).
29. Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke MJ, Egger M. Grey literature in metaanalyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:MR000010.
30. Lawrence A. Electronic documents in a print world: Grey literature and the internet. Media Int Aust. 2012;143:122-131.
31. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Motor neurone disease: The use of non-invasive ventilation in the management of motor neurone disease. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2010 July. Report No: NICE CG105.
32. Garrison LP, Neumann PJ, Erickson P, Marshall D, Mullins CD. Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: The IS-POR Real-World Data Task Force Report. Value Health. 2007;10:326-335.
33. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed August 22, 2013).
34. Lavis J, Oxman A, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 9: Assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;16(Suppl 1):S9.
35. Department of Health. Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-117353 London. (accessed 12 September 2013).
36. Staniszewska S, Crowe S, Badenoch D, et al. The PRIME project: Developing a patient evidence-base. Health Expect. 2010;13:312-322.