Improving methane production from wheat straw by digestate liquor recirculation in continuous stirred tank processes

Renewable Energy

Volumn 85, Issue , 2016, Pages 12-18

  Peng, Xiaowei ^a,c   Nges, Ivo Achu ^a   Liu, Jing ^a,b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Bioprocess Control AB   (Sweden)

^c INSTITUTE OF PROCESS ENGINEERING   (China)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Digestate; Macronutrients; Sewage sludge; Wheat straw

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; FILTRATION; NUTRIENTS; RECYCLING; SEWAGE SLUDGE; SLUDGE DIGESTION; STRAW; SUBSTRATES; TANKS (CONTAINERS);

CONTINUOUS STIRRED TANKS; DIGESTATE; MACRONUTRIENTS; METHANE FERMENTATION; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; SOLID RETENTION TIME; WHEAT STRAWS;

METHANE;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOREACTOR; FERMENTATION; METHANE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEWAGE; SLUDGE; STRAW; WHEAT;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84937622535     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: 18790682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.023     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Appels L., Lauwers J., Degrève J., Helsen L., Lievens B., Willems K., Van Impe J., Dewil R. Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: potential and research challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15:4295-4301.
2. Cherubini F., Ulgiati S. Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems - a LCA case study. Appl. Energy 2010, 87:47-57.
3. Crespo C.F., Badshah M., Alvarez M.T., Mattiasson B. Ethanol production by continuous fermentation of d-(+)-cellobiose, d-(+)-xylose and sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate using the thermoanaerobe Caloramator boliviensis. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 103:186-191.
4. Nges I.A., Björn A., Björnsson L. Stable operation during pilot-scale anaerobic digestion of nutrient-supplemented maize/sugar beet silage. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 118:445-454.
5. Takashima M., Shimada K., Speece R.E. Minimum requirements for trace metals (iron, nickel, cobalt, and zinc) in thermophilic and mesophilic methane fermentation from glucose. Water Environ. Res. 2011, 83:339-346.
6. Scherer P., Neumann L., Demirel B., Schmidt O., Unbehauen M. Long term fermentation studies about the nutritional requirements for biogasification of fodder beet silage as mono-substrate. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33:873-881.
7. Lei Z., Chen J., Zhang Z., Sugiura N. Methane production from rice straw with acclimated anaerobic sludge: effect of phosphate supplementation. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4343-4348.
8. Bruni E., Jensen A.P., Pedersen E.S., Angelidaki I. Anaerobic digestion of maize focusing on variety, harvest time and pretreatment. Appl. Energy 2010, 87:2212-2217.
9. Wu X., Yao W.Y., Zhu J., Miller C. Biogas and CH4 productivity by co-digesting swine manure with three crop residues as an external carbon source. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4042-4047.
10. Demirel B., Scherer P. Trace element requirements of agricultural biogas digesters during biological conversion of renewable biomass to methane. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:992-998.
11. Cordell D., Drangert J.-O., White S. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought,. Glob. Environ. Change 2009, 19:292-305.
12. Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85:849-860.
13. Nkemka V.N., Murto M. Biogas production from wheat straw in batch and UASB reactors: the roles of pretreatment and seaweed hydrolysate as a co-substrate,. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 128:164-172.
14. Pohl M., Heeg K., Mumme J. Anaerobic digestion of wheat straw - performance of continuous solid-state digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 146:408-415.
15. Idrus S., Banks C.J., Heaven S. Assessment of the potential for biogas production from wheat straw leachate in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket digesters. Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 66:2737-2744.
16. FNR, Biogas- Messprogramm 61 Biogasanlagen im Vergleich., Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e. V., Gulzow, Germany 2010, (in German).
17. Kafle G.K., Kim S.H. Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: batch and continuous operation. Appl. Energy 2013, 103:61-72.
18. Fu X., Nges I.A., Kreuger E., Lovisa B. Comparison of Reactor Configurations for Biogas Production from Energy Crops Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), Asia-Pacific, 28-31 March 2010 2010, 1-4.
19. Demirel B., Scherer P. Production of methane from sugar beet silage without manure addition by a single-stage anaerobic digestion process. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32:203-209.
20. Kaparaju P., Serrano M., Angelidaki I. Effect of reactor configuration on biogas production from wheat straw hydrolysate. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:6317-6323.
21. Felchner-Zwirello M. Propionic Acid Degradation by Syntrophic Bacteria during Anaerobic Biowaste Treatment 2013, 21. Karlsruhe University of Technology, Germany, Dissertation.
22. Badshah M., Lam D.M., Liu J., Mattiasson B. Use of an automatic methane potential test system for evaluating the biomethane potential of sugarcane bagasse after different treatments. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114:262-269.
23. APHA Total, fixed, and volatile solids in solid and semisolid samples. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Baltimore. twenty-first ed. A.D. Eaton, L.S. Clesceri, E.W. Rice, A.E. Greenberg, M.A. Franson (Eds.).
24. Angelidaki I., Ahring B.K. Anaerobic thermophilic digestion of manure at different ammonia loads: effect of temperature. Water Res. 1994, 28:727-731.
25. Nges I.A., Björnsson L. High methane yields and stable operation during anaerobic digestion of nutrient-supplemented energy crop mixtures. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 47:62-70.
26. Mshandete A., Kivaisi A., Rubindamayugi M., Mattiasson B. Anaerobic batch co-digestion of sisal pulp and fish wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 95:19-24.
27. Speece R.E. Nutrient requirements. Anaerobic Digestion of Biomass 1987, Elsevier applied science publishers LTD. University press, Cambridge. D.P. Chynoweth, R. Isaacson (Eds.).
28. Nges I.A., Liu J. Effects of anaerobic pre-treatment on the degradation of dewatered-sewage sludge. Renew. Energy 2009, 34:1795-1800.
29. Zhong W., Zhang Z., Luo Y., Sun S., Qiao W., Xiao M. Effect of biological pretreatments in enhancing corn straw biogas production. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:11177-11182.
30. Chen Y., Cheng J.J., Creamer K.S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review,. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:4044-4064.
31. Lebuhn M., Liu F., Heuwinkel H., Gronauer A. Biogas production from mono-digestion of maize silage-long-term process stability and requirements. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 58:1645-1651.
32. Bouallagui H., Lahdheb H., Ben Romdan E., Rachdi B., Hamdi M. Improvement of fruit and vegetable waste anaerobic digestion performance and stability with co-substrates addition. J.Environ. Manag. 2009, 90:1844-1849.
33. Heiske S., Schultz-Jensen N., Leipold F., Schmidt J.E. Improving anaerobic digestion of wheat straw by plasma-assisted pretreatment. J.Atomic Mol. Phys. 2013, 2013:7.
34. Pöschl M., Ward S., Owende P. Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Appl. Energy 2010, 87:3305-3321.
35. Molinuevo-Salces B., González-Fernández C., Gómez X., García-González M.C., Morán A. Vegetable processing wastes addition to improve swine manure anaerobic digestion: evaluation in terms of methane yield and SEM characterization. Appl. Energy 2012, 91:36-42.
36. Van Dael M., Van Passel S., Pelkmans L., Guisson R., Reumermann P., Luzardo N.M., Witters N., Broeze J. Atechno-economic evaluation of a biomass energy conversion park. Appl. Energy 2013, 104:611-622.
37. González-Fernández C., Molinuevo-Salces B., García-González M.C. Evaluation of anaerobic codigestion of microalgal biomass and swine manure via response surface methodology. Appl. Energy 2011, 88:3448-3453.
38. Schattauer A., Abdoun E., Weiland P., Plöchl M., Heiermann M. Abundance of trace elements in demonstration biogas plants. Biosyst. Eng. 2011, 108:57-65.
39. Zitomer D.H., Johnson C.C., Speece R.E. Metal stimulation and municipal digester thermophilic/mesophilic activity. J.Environ. Eng. ASCE 2008, 134:42-47.
40. Kim J.O., Kim Y.H., Ryu J.Y., Song B.K., Kim I.H., Yeom S.H. Immobilization methods for continuous hydrogen gas production biofilm formation versus granulation. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:1331-1337.