Aligning vertical collection relevance with user intent

CIKM 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1915-1918

  Zhou, Ke ^a   Demeester, Thomas ^b   Nguyen, Dong ^c   Hiemstra, Djoerd ^c   Trieschnigg, Dolf ^c  

^a YAHOO RESEARCH   (United States)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aggregated search; Evaluation; Federated search; User intent; Vertical relevance

Indexed keywords

SEARCH ENGINES;

AGGREGATED SEARCH; EVALUATION; FEDERATED SEARCH; USER INTENT; VERTICAL RELEVANCE;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84937597782     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2661829.2661941     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. J. Arguello, F. Diaz, J. Callan, and J.-F. Crespo. Sources of evidence for vertical selection. In SIGIR '09.
2. T. Demeester, D. Trieschnigg, D. Nguyen, D. Hiemstra. Overview of the TREC 2013 Federated Web Search Track. In TREC'13.
3. L. Gravano, H. Garcia-Molina and A. Tomasic. Precision and recall of GlOSS estimators for database discovery. In IEEE Parallel and Distributed Information Systems, 1994.
4. J. Kekalainen and J. Kalervo. Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation. In JASIST'02.
5. M. Sanderson, M. L. Paramita, P. Clough, and E. Kanoulas. Do user preferences and evaluation measures line up? In SIGIR'10.
6. S. Sushmita, H. Joho, M. Lalmas, and R. Villa. Factors affecting click-through behavior in aggregated search interfaces. In CIKM '10.
7. A. Powell and J. French. Comparing the performance of collection selection algorithms. In ACM TOIS'03.
8. K. Zhou, R. Cummins, M. Lalmas, and J. M. Jose. Evaluating reward and risk for vertical selection. In CIKM'12.
9. K. Zhou, R. Cummins, M. Lalmas and J.M. Jose. Which Vertical Search Engines are Relevant? In WWW'13.