Is robot telepathy acceptable? Investigating effects of nonverbal robot-robot communication on human-robot interaction

IEEE RO-MAN 2014 - 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication: Human-Robot Co-Existence: Adaptive Interfaces and Systems for Daily Life, Therapy, Assistance and Socially Engaging Interactions

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 886-891

  Williams, Tom ^a   Briggs, Priscilla ^a   Pelz, Nathaniel ^a   Scheutz, Matthias ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; DISASTER PREVENTION; ROBOTS;

EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; INFORMATION TRANSMISSION; INVESTIGATING EFFECTS; NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATIONS; RECENT RESEARCHES; RELAY INFORMATION; ROBOT COMMUNICATION;

SOCIAL ROBOTS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 84937597070     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926365     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. K. Dautenhahn, Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 362, no. 1480, pp. 679-704, 2007.
2. M. Scheutz, P. Schermerhorn, J. Kramer, and D. Anderson, First steps toward natural human-like HRI, Autonomous Robots, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 411-423, May 2007.
3. S. Lalle, U. Pattacini, S. Lemaignan, A. Lenz, C. Melhuish, L. Natale, S. Skachek, K. Hamann, J. Steinwender, E. A. Sisbot, et al., Towards a platform-independent cooperative human robot interaction system: Iii an architecture for learning and executing actions and shared plans, Autonomous Mental Development, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 239-253, 2012.
4. H. Brenton, M. Gillies, D. Ballin, and D. Chatting, D.: The uncanny valley: does it exist, in In: 19th British HCI Group Annual Conference: workshop on human-Animated character interaction, 2005.
5. K. F. MacDorman, Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familiarity, and eeriness: An exploration of the uncanny valley, in ICCS/CogSci-2006 long symposium: Toward social mechanisms of android science, 2006, pp. 26-29.
6. M. L. Walters, D. S. Syrdal, K. Dautenhahn, R. Te Boekhorst, and K. L. Koay, Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion, Autonomous Robots, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 159-178, 2008.
7. L. Steels, Evolving grounded communication for robots, Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 308-312, 2003.
8. K. M. Tsui, A. Norton, D. J. Brooks, E. McCann, M. S. Medvedev, and H. A. Yanco, Design and development of two generations of semiautonomous social telepresence robots, in Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA), 2013 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2013, pp. 1-6.
9. C. I. Nass and S. Brave, Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human-computer relationship. MIT press Cambridge, 2005.
10. P. Schermerhorn, M. Scheutz, and C. R. Crowell, Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males? in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. ACM, 2008, pp. 263-270.
11. F. Eyssel, D. Kuchenbrandt, S. Bobinger, L. de Ruiter, and F. Hegel, if you sound like me, you must be more human: on the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism, in Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2012, pp. 125-126.