What Works In Family Court Welfare

Probation Journal

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 87-91

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937579196     PISSN: 02645505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026455059804500206     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Home Office (1995) Strengthening Punishment in the Community: A Consultation Document, London: HMSO.
2. See also Home Office (1997) Changing Offenders Attitudes and Behaviour: What Works? Home Office Research Study 171.
3. See, for example, Porporino, F.J. and Robinson, D. (1992) Can Educating Adult Offenders Counteract Recidivism? A report prepared for the ACA Winter Conference, Portland, Oregon, Correctional Service of Canada.
4. See Davis, G. (1988) Partisans and Mediators, pp 129-144, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. James, A. and Hay, W. (1993) Court Welfare in Action: Practice and Theory, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
6. Davis, G., Cretney, S.M., and Collins, J. (1994) Simple Quarrels, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. HM Inspectorate of Probation (1997) Family Court Welfare Work: Report of a Thematic Inspection, London: Home Office.
8. Goldstein, J., Freud, A. and Solnit, A.J. (1973) Beyond the Best Interests of the Child, New York: The Free Press.
9. The most powerful statement of this position remains that advanced by Wallerstein, J.S. and Kelly, J. (1980) Surviving the Break-up, London: Grant McIntyre.
10. Richards, M.P.M. (1982), Post-Divorce Arrangements for Children: A Psychological Perspective, Journal of Social Welfare Law 133.
11. See Note 7.
12. See Note 7.
13. King, M. (1987) Playing the Symbols - Custody and the Law Commission, Family Law, Vol. 17, 6.
14. Davis, G. (1988) Partisans and Mediators, p 133, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15. See Note 6.