Expressive motion with x, y and theta: Laban Effort Features for mobile robots

IEEE RO-MAN 2014 - 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication: Human-Robot Co-Existence: Adaptive Interfaces and Systems for Daily Life, Therapy, Assistance and Socially Engaging Interactions

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 267-273

  Knight, Heather ^a   Simmons, Reid ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); MACHINE DESIGN; MOBILE ROBOTS; ROBOTS;

AMAZON MECHANICAL TURKS; BODY LANGUAGE; LOW DEGREE; MACHINE ANALYSIS; MOTION FEATURES; QUALITY OF RESULTS; ROBOT SYSTEM; SOCIAL COMMUNICATIONS;

SOCIAL ROBOTS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 84937578559     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926264     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. F. Abella, F. Happb and U. Fritha. Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development. Cognitive Development, Vol. 15:1, pp. 1-16, January-March 2000
2. J. Becker, S. Breedlove and D Crews. Behavioral Endocinology. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2003
3. A. Bogart and T. Landau. The Viewpoints Book: A practical guide to Viewpoints and Composition. Theater Communications Group, 2005
4. C. Breazeal. Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press, 2004
5. A. Bruce, et al. Robot Improv: Using drama to create believable agents. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2000.
6. F. Castelli, et al. Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns. NeuroImage, Vol 12: 314-325, 2000
7. J. Chen, W. Lin, K. Tsai and S. Dai. Analysis and Evaluation of Human Movement based on Laban Movement Analysis. Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 255-264, 2011
8. A. Engel, et al. How moving objects become animated: The human mirror neuron system assimilates non-biological movement patterns. Social Neuroscience, 3:3-4, 2008
9. V. Gazzola, et al. The anthropomorphic brain: the mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. Neuroimage 35.4 1674-1684, 2007
10. M. Hauser, N. Chomsky and W. Fitch. The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science: 298 (5598), 1569-1579, November 22, 2002
11. J. Harris and E. Sharlin, Exploring emotive actuation and its role in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2010
12. F. Heider and M. Simmel. An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 57(2), 1944
13. F. Heider. Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, Vol 51(6): 358-374, 1944
14. W. Ju and L. Takayama. Approachability: How people interpret automatic door movement as gesture. Intl Journal of Design, 2009
15. H. Kelley. The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, Vol 28(2): 107-128, Feb, 1973
16. A. Kittur, E. H. Chi, and B. Suh. "Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk." Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2008.
17. H. Knight. Eight lessons learned about non-verbal interactions through robot theater. In Proceedings International Conference on Social Robotics, Amsterdam Netherlands, November 2011
18. R. Laban. Modern Educational Dance. Macdonald & Evans, 1963
19. A. LaViers and M. Egerstedt. Style Based Robotic Motion. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 2012
20. A. Lim. Design and Implementation of Emotions for Humanoid Robots based on the Modality-independent DESIRE Model. Masters Thesis at Kyoto University, 2012
21. D. Lu and W. Smart. Human Robot Interaction as Theatre. In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Communication, 2011
22. M. Masuda, S. Kato and H. Itoh. Laban-Based Motion Rendering for Emotional Expression of Human Form Robots. Chapter in Knowledge Management and Acquisition for Smart Systems and Services Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 6232: 49-60, 2010.
23. B. Mutlu and J. Forlizzi. Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. Proceedings Intl Conf on Human-Robot Interaction, 2008
24. Picard, R. Affective computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997
25. J. Rett and J. Dias. Human-robot interface with anticipatory characteristics based on Laban Movement Analysis and Bayesian models. In IEEE 10th Intl Conf on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2007
26. J. Rett, L. Santos, and J. Dias. Laban movement analysis for multiocular systems. In Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2008.
27. M. Saerbeck and C. Bartneck. Perception of affect elicited by robot motion. In Proc. Intl Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2010
28. L. Santos and J. Dias. Human-Robot Interaction: Invariant 3-D Features for Laban Movement Analysis Shape Component. In Proceedings of Intl Conference on Robotics and Applications, 2009
29. M. Sharma, et al. Communicating affect via flight path: exploring use of the laban effort system for designing affective locomotion paths. In Proceedings Intl Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2013
30. K. Strabala, M. Lee, A. Dragan, J. Forlizzi, S. Srinivasa, M. Cakmak, and V. Micelli Towards Seamless Human-Robot Handovers. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 2013
31. L. Takayama, D. Dooley and W. Ju. Expressing thought: Improving robot readability with animation principles. ACM/IEEE Proceedings International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2011