Going it alone?: Lone motherhood in late modernity

Going it Alone?: Lone Motherhood in Late Modernity

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-166

  Klett Davies, Martina ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937541526     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (317)

1. Abbott, P. and Wallace, C. (1997), An Introduction to Sociology - Feminist Perspectives, 2nd edition. (London: Routledge).
2. Adam, B. (1996), ‘Detraditionalization and the certainty of uncertain futures’, in P Heelas et al. (eds.).
3. Albelda, R., Himmelweit, S. and Humphries, J. (eds.) (2005), Dilemmas of Lone Motherhood (New York: Routledge).
4. Andreß, H.-J. (2001), ‘Die wirtschaftliche Lage Alleinerziehender’, in Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (ed.).
5. Annesley, C. (2002), ‘Reconfiguring women's social citizenship in Germany: The right to Sozialhilfe; the responsibility to work’, German Politics 11:1, 81-96.
6. Antonovsky, A. (1987), Unravelling the Mystery of Health (San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Inc.).
7. Antonovsky, A. (ed.) (1990), The Sociology of Health and Health Care in Israel (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers).
8. Antonovsky, A. and Sourani, T. (1990), ‘Family sense of coherence and family adaptation’, in A. Antonovsky (ed.).
9. Archer, M. S. (1995), Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
10. Archer, M. S. (1996), ‘Social integration and system integration developing the distinction’, Sociology 30:2, 679-99.
11. Askonas, P. and Stewart, A. (eds.) (2000), Social Inclusion - Possibilities and Tensions (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
12. Baily, L. (1999), ‘Refracted selves? A study of changes in self-identity in the transition to motherhood’, Sociology 34:2, 335-52.
13. Baldwin, S. and Falkingham, J. (eds.) (1994), Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
14. Barlow, A., Duncan, S. and James, G. (2002), ‘New Labour, the rationality mistake and family policy in Britain’, in A. Carling et al. (eds.).
15. Barnes, B. (2000), Understanding Agency - Social Theory and Responsible Action (London: Sage).
16. Barrett, M. and McIntosh, M. (1991), The Anti-social Family, 2nd Edition. (London: Verso).
17. Bartholomew, R., Hinnert, A. and Sidaway, J. (1992), ‘Lone parents and the labour market: evidence from the Labour Force Survey’, Employment Gazette, November, 559-77.
18. Bauman, Z. (1996), ‘From pilgrim to tourist - or a short history of identity’, in S. Hall and Du Gay (eds.).
19. Bauman, Z. (1998), Globalization (Cambridge: Polity Press).
20. Bauman, Z. (2000), ‘What it means ‘to be excluded’: living to stay apart - or together?’, in P Askonas and A. Stewart (eds.).
21. Bauman, Z. (2001), The Individualized Society (Cambridge: Polity Press).
22. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London: Sage).
23. Beck, U.(1997), ‘Capitalism without work’, Dissent, Winter, 51-56.
24. Beck, U.(1998a), ‘Das große Los - arbeitslos - Ein Berliner Manifest proklamiert: Freizeit macht froh’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 19. June, 13.
25. Beck, U.(1998b), Democracy without Enemies (Cambridge: Polity Press).
26. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1993), ‘NichtAutonomie sondern Bastelbiographie. Anmerkungen zur Individualisierungsdiskussion am Beispiel des Aufsatzes von Günter Burkart’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 22:3, 178-87.
27. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1994), ‘Individualisierung in modernen Gesellschaften - Perspektiven und Kontroversen einer subjektorientierten Soziologie’, in U. Beck and E. BeckGernsheim (eds.).
28. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (eds.) (1994), Riskante Freiheiten (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
29. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995), The Normal Chaos of Love (Cambridge: Polity Press).
30. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1996), ‘Individualisation and ‘precarious freedoms’: perspectives and controversies of a subject-oriented sociology’, in P. Heelas et al. (eds.).
31. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002), Individualization (London: Sage).
32. Beck, U., Bonß, W. and Lau, C. (2003), ‘The theory of reflexive modernization: problematic, hypotheses and research programme’, Theory, Culture and Society20:2, 1-34.
33. Becker-Schmidt, R. (1987), ‘Frauen und Deklassierung. Geschlecht und Klasse’, in U. Beer (ed.).
34. Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1994), ‘Auf dem Weg in die postfamiliare Familie - von der Notgemeinschaft zur Wahlverwandtschaft’, in U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim (eds.).
35. Beck-Gernsheim, E.(2002),Reinventing the Family: in Search of Lifestyles (Cambridge: Polity Press).
36. Beer, U. (ed.) (1987), Klasse Geschlecht. Feministische Gesellschaftsanalyse und Wissenschaftskritik (Bielefeld: Kleine Verlag).
37. Behrend, H. (1995), ‘East German women and the Wende’, The European Journal of Women's Studies 2, 237-55.
38. Bell, A., Finch, N., La Valle, I. Sainsbury, R. and Skinner, C. (2005), A Question of Balance: Lone Parents, Childcare and Work, Department of Work and Pensions, Research Report 230. (Leeds: Corporate Document Services).
39. Bellers, A. (1992), Politik für die Familie - Eine Vergleichende Analyse familienpolitischer Maßnahmen auf Bundes-, Landes- und kommunaler Ebene in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Band 78. (Münster: Lit Verlag).
40. Berthoud, D. (2003), ‘Lone parents and jobs - Can the 70 per cent target be met?’, in D. Thurley (ed.).
41. Bertram, H., Hradil, G. and Kleinhenz, G. (eds.) (1996), Sozialer und demographischer Wandel in den neuen Bundesländern (Obladen: Leske und Budrich).
42. Bien, W. (ed.) (1996), Familie an der Schwelle zum neuen Jahrtausend (Opladen: Leske and Budrich).
43. Bleses, P. (2003), ‘Der Umbau geht weiter - Lohnarbeit und Familien in der rot- gruenen Sozialpolitik’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 49, 557- 83.
44. Blossfeld, H.-P. (ed.) (1995), The New Role of Women - Family Formation in Modern Societies (Boulder: Westview Press).
45. Blossfeld, H.-P. and Rohwer, G. (1995), ‘West Germany’, in H.-P. Blossfeld (ed.).
46. Bowring, F. (1999), ‘Job scarcity: the perverted form of a potential blessing’, Sociology 33:1, 69-84.
47. Bradshaw, J. (1998), ‘International comparisons of support for lone parents’, in R. Ford and J. Millar (eds.).
48. Bradshaw, J., Stimson, C., Skinner, C. and Williams, J. (1999), Absent Fathers?(London: Routledge).
49. Brand, D. and Hammer, V. (eds.) (2002), Balanceakt Alleinerziehend. Lebenslagen, Lebensformen, Erwerbsarbeit (Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag).
50. Brannen, J. (1994), ‘Sociological definitions of the family: employment relationships in the United Kingdom’, in M.-T. Letablier and L. Hantrais (eds.).
51. Brannen, J (1999), ‘Reconsidering children and childhood: sociological and policy perspectives’, in E.B. Silva and C. Smart (eds.).
52. Brannen, J. and Nilsen, A. (2005), ‘Individualisation, choice and structure: a discussion of current trends in sociological analysis’, The Sociological Review53:3, 412-28.
53. Braun, M., Scott, J. and Alwin, D. F. (1994), ‘Economic necessity or self-actualisation? Attitudes towards women's labour force participation in East and West Germany’, European Sociological Review 10:1, 29-47.
54. Bruegel, I. and Perrons, D. (1996), Deregulation and woman's employment: the diverse experiences of women in Britain, Gender Institute, Discussion Paper 2. (London: London School of Economics).
55. Bruttel, O. and Sol, E. (2006), ‘Work First as a European Model? Evidence from Germany and the Netherlands’, Policy and Politics 34:1, 69-89.
56. Bryman, A. and Burgess, R.G. (eds.) (1994), Analysing Qualitative Data (London: Routledge).
57. Bryson, A., Ford, R. and White, M. (1997), Making Work Pay - Lone Mothers, Employment and Well Being (York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
58. Bryson, C., Kazimirski, A. and Southwood, H. (2006), Childcare and Early Years Provision: A Study of Parents’ Use, Views and Experience, Department of Education and Skills, Research Report 723. (London: National Centre for Social Research).
59. accessed 10 July 2006.
60. Bütow, B. and Stecker, H. (eds.) (1994), EigenArtige Ostfrauen - Frauenemanzipation in der DDR und den neuen Bundesländern(Bielefeld: Kleine Verlag).
61. Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landeskunde und Raumordnung (ed.) (1994), Wohnsituation Alleinerziehender II (Bonn: Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landeskunde und Raumordnung).
62. Bundesministerium für Familien, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (1998), Die neue Beistandschaft (Bonn: Bundesministerium für Familien, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend).
63. Bundesministerium für Familien, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (ed.) (2001), Alleinerziehen in Deutschland: Resourcen und Risiken einer Lebensformen (Berlin: Langelüddecke).
64. Bundesministerium für Familien, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (2006), ‘Bosch-Studie - Unternehmen Familie bestaetigt Entscheidungen in Familienpolitik’, Pressemitteilung, 31 March.
65. Burkhart, G. (1998), ‘Individualisierung und Elternschaft. Eine empirische Überprüfung der Individualisierungsthese am Beispiel USA und ein Systematisierungsvorschlag’, in J. Friedrichs (ed.).
66. Campbell, C. (1996), ‘Detraditionalization, character and the limits to agency’, in P. Heelas et al. (eds.).
67. Carling, A., Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. (eds.) (2002), Analysing Families - Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice (London: Routledge).
68. Casebourne, J. and Britton, L. (2004), Lone Parents, Health and Work, Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report 214. (Leeds: Corporate Document Services).
69. Chamberlayne, D. (1993), ‘Women and the state: changes in roles and rights in France, West Germany, Italy and Britain, 1970 - 1990’, in J. Lewis (ed.).
70. Chancellor of the Exchequer (1998), Pre-Budget Report, November. (London: HMSO).
71. Cheal, D. (1991), Family and the State of Theory (Hemel Hampstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
72. Chodorow, N. (1978), The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (Berkley: University of California University Press).
73. Clarke, J. and Langan, M. (1993a), ‘The British welfare state: foundation and modernisation’, in A. Cochrane and J. Clarke (eds.).
74. Clarke, J. and Langan, M. (1993b), ‘Restructuring welfare: the British welfare regime in the 1980's, in A. Cochrane and J. Clarke (eds.).
75. Clasen, J. and Freeman, R. (1994), Social Policy in Germany (Hemel Hampstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
76. Cochrane, A. and Clarke J. (eds.) (1993), Comparing Welfare States - Britain in International Context (London: Sage).
77. Crompton, R. (2005), Class and the Family, Department of Sociology, GeNet Working Paper 9. (London: City University), accessed on 10 July 2006.
78. Crompton, R. and Le Feuvre, N. (1996), ‘Paid employment and the changing system of gender relations: a cross-national comparison’, Sociology 30:3, 427-45.
79. Crow, G. (2002), ‘Families, moralities and social change’, in A. Carling et al. (eds.).
80. Daly, M. (1996), The Gender Division of Welfare: the British and German Welfare States Compared, PhD thesis. (Florence: European University Institute).
81. Daly, M (2005), ‘Changing family life in Europe: Significance for state and society’, European Societies 7:3, 379-98.
82. Dathe, D. (1996), ‘Zur Einkommenslage ausgewählter Haushaltstypen in den neuen Bundesländern’, in H. Bertram et al. (eds.).
83. Daune-Richard, A. M. (1998), ‘How does the ‘societal effect’ shape the use of parttime work in France, the UK and Sweden?’, in J. O’Reilly and C. Fagan (eds.).
84. Deacon, B. (1993), ‘Developments in East European social policy’, in C. Jones (ed.).
85. Dennis, N. and Erdos, G. (1992), Families Without Fatherhood (London: Institute of Economic Affairs Health and Welfare Unit).
86. Department for Work and Pensions (2005), Delivering PSA Targets — Target 4a(Leeds: Corporate Document Services). accessed on 10 July 2006.
87. Dienel, C. (ed.) (2005), Abwanderung, Geburtenrückgang und Regionale Entwicklung (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag).
88. DiQuinzio, P. (1999), The Impossibility of Motherhood: Feminism, Individualism and the Problem of Mothering(New York: Routledge).
89. Drauschke, P. and Stolzenburg, M. (1994a), ‘Alleinerziehende Frauen in Berlin Ost - Sie wohnen wie immer - nur anders’, in Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landeskunde und Raumordnung (ed.).
90. Drauschke, P. and Stolzenburg, M. (1994b), Zur Situation alleinerziehender Frauen in Berlin Ost auf dem Arbeitsmarkt - Sozialreport 1 (Gelsenkirchen: Sozialwissenschaftliches Forschungszentrum).
91. Duncan, S. (2000), New Labour's ‘Rationality and Morality Mistakes’ — and Some Alternatives, ESRC Research Group on Care, Values and the Future of Welfare, Workshop Paper 11. (Leeds: University of Leeds).
92. Duncan, S. (2002), ‘Policy discourses on ‘reconciling work and life’ in the EU’, Social Policy and Society 1:4, 305-14.
93. Duncan, S. (2006), ‘Mothers’ work-life balance: individualized preferences or cultural construction?’, in D. Perrons et al. (eds.).
94. Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. (eds.) (1997), Single Mothers In an International Context: Mothers or Workers? (London: UCL Press).
95. Duncan, S.(1999), Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities (London: MacMillan).
96. Duncan, S. and Pfau-Effinger, B. (eds.) (2000), Gender, Economy and Culture in the European Union (London: Routledge).
97. Edwards, R. and Duncan, S. (1996), ‘Rational economic man or lone mothers in context? The uptake of paid work’, in E. B. Silva (ed.).
98. Ellermann, H. and Klatt, K. (1995), Bundesdeutsche Hausfrau? — Nie im Leben(Berlin: Hoho Verlag Christine Hoffmann).
99. Ely, M. (1999), ‘The importance of estimates and confidence intervals rather than p values’, Sociology 33:1, 185-90.
100. Engels, F. (1990), Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Staats, 7th edition. (Berlin: Dietz Verlag).
101. Engstler, H. (1998), Die Familie im Spiegel der amtlichen Statistik (Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend).
102. Engstler, H. and Menning, S. (2003), Die Familie im Spiegel der amtlichen Statistik(Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend), accessed on 10 July 2006.
103. Erler, W. (2004), ‘Single parents in Germany: The career of a topic in social research and policy’, in S. Hübner-Funk (ed.).
104. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity Press).
105. Esping-Andersen, G.(1999), Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
106. Evans, M., McKnight, A. and Namazie, C. (2002), New Deal for Lone Parents: First Synthesis Report of the National Evaluation, Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report 116. (Leeds: Corporate Document Services).
107. Evans, M., Eyre, J., Millar, J. and Sarre, S. (2003), New Deal for Lone Parents: Second Synthesis Report of the National Evaluation, Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report 163. (Leeds: Corporate Document Services).
108. Evans, M., Harkness, S. and Ortiz, R. (2004), Lone Parents Cycling Between Work and Benefits, Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report 217. (Leeds: Corporate Document Services).
109. Evans, P. M. (1992), ‘Targeting single mothers for employment: comparisons from the United States, Britain and Canada’, Social Services Review 66:3, 378-98.
110. Everingham, C. (1994), Motherhood and Modernity (Buckingham: Open University Press).
111. Ferri, E. and Smith, K. (1996), Parenting in the 1990s (London: Family Policy Studies Centre).
112. Ferris, J. and Page, R. (eds.) (1994), Social Policy in Transition (Avebury: Aldershot).
113. Finch, J. (1989), Family Obligations and Social Change (Cambridge: Polity Press).
114. Finlayson, L. and Marsh, A. (1998), ‘Lone parents on the margins of work’, in R. Ford and J. Millar (eds.).
115. Finlayson, L., Ford, R., Marsh, A., McKay, A. and Mukherjee, A. (2000),The British Lone Parent Cohort 1991-1998, Department of Social Security, Report 25. (Leeds: Corporate Document Services).
116. Folbre, N. (1994), Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraints (New York: Routledge).
117. Ford, R. (1996), Childcare in the Balance: How Lone Parents Make Decisions About Work (London: Policy Studies Institute).
118. Ford, R (1998), ‘Lone mothers’ decisions whether or not to work: childcare in the balance’, in R. Ford and J. Millar (eds.).
119. Ford, R. and Millar, J. (eds.) (1998), Private Lives and Public Responses - Lone Parenthood and Future Policy in the UK (London: Policy Studies Institute).
120. Friedrichs, J. (ed.) (1998), Die Individualisierungsthese (Opladen: Leske and Budrich).
121. Frise, M. and Stahlberg, J. (1992), Allein mit Kind - Alleinerziehende Mütter und Väter (München: Piper).
122. Gardner, S. (1998), ‘Mothers to get full rights to pensions’, Sunday Times, Money Section, 6. September.
123. Gauthier, A. H. (1996),The State and the Family - a Comparative Analysis of Family Policies in Industrialised Countries(Oxford: Clarendon Press).
124. General Household Survey (2006), ‘Tables from the 2004/2005 General Household Survey’, accessed on 10 July 2006.
125. Giddens, A. (1987), Social Theory and Modern Sociology (Stanford: Stanford University Press).
126. Giddens, A. (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity (Cambridge: Polity Press).
127. Giddens, A. (1992), The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies (Cambridge: Polity Press).
128. Giddens, A. (1997), Sociology, 3rd edition. (Cambridge: Polity Press).
129. Giddens, A.(1998),The Third Way: the Renewal of Social Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).
130. Giddings, L., Dingeldey, I. and Ulbricht, S. (2005), ‘The commodification of lone mothers’ labour: a comparison of US and German Policies’, in R. Albelda et al. (eds.).
131. Gillies, V. (2005), ‘Raising the ‘meritocracy’? Parenting and the individualization of social class, Sociology 39:5, 835-53.
132. Ginn, J., Arber, S., Brannen, J. et al. (1996), ‘Feminist fallacies: a reply to Hakim on women's employment’, British Journal of Sociology 17:1, 167-74.
133. Ginsburg, N. (1992), Divisions of Welfare - a Critical Introduction to Comparative Social Policy (London: Sage).
134. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Chicago: Aldine).
135. Gonzáles López, M. and Solsona Pairó, M. (2000), ‘Households and families’, in S. Duncan and B. Pfau-Effinger (eds.).
136. Großmann, H. and Huth, S. (1996), ‘Sozialhilfeabhängigkeit Alleinerziehender als Folge gesellschaftlichen Umbruchs’, in H. Bertram et al. (eds.).
137. Gutschmidt, G. (1994), Single mit Kind, Alleinerziehen - wie es die anderen machen (Freiburg: Herder Verlag).
138. Gutschmidt, G. (1997), ‘Die Mütterfalle’, Emma Jan/Feb, 88-91.
139. Habermas, J. (1985), Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns 2, 3rd edition. (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp).
140. Hakim, C. (1997), ‘Predicting work-lifestyles in the 21st century: preference theory’, paper presented to the workshop on ‘Towards a gendered political economy’, University of Sheffield, 17-18 September.
141. Hakim, C (2000), Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century - Preference Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
142. Hall, S. and Du Gay, P. (eds.) (1996), Questions of Cultural Identity (London: Sage).
143. Hammer, V. (2005), ‘Lebensform Alleinerziehende’, Online-Texte der Evangelischen Akademie Bad Woll, accessed on 10 July 2006.
144. Hank, K., Tillmann, K. and Wagner, G. (2001), Ausserhäusliche Kinderbetreuung in stdeutschland vor und nach der Wiedervereinigung. Ein Vergleich mit Westdeutschland in den Jahren 1990-1999, Working Paper 2001-003. (Rostock: Max-Planck-Institute).
145. Hantrais, L. (1994), ‘Comparing family policy in Britain, France and Germany’, Journal of Social Policy 23:2, 135-60.
146. Harrop, A. and Moss, P. (1995), ‘Trends in parental employment’, Work, Employment and Society 9:3, 424-44.
147. Haskey, J. (1993), ‘Lone parents and married parents with dependent children in Great Britain: a comparison of their occupation and social class profiles’, Population Trends 72, 34-44.
148. Haskey, J (1995), ‘Trends in marriage and cohabitation: the decline in marriage and the changing patterns of living in partnerships’, Population Trends 80, 8-15.
149. Haskey, J. (1998), ‘One-parent families and their dependent children in Great Britain’, in R. Ford and J. Millar (eds.).
150. Haskey, J. (2002), ‘One-parent families – and the dependent children living in them – in Great Britain’, Population Trends 109, 46–57.
151. Heelas, P., Lash, S. and Morris, P. (eds.) (1996), Detraditionalization: Critical Reflections on Authority and Identity (Oxford: Blackwell).
152. Heiliger, A. (1993), Alleinerziehen als Befreiung (Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus-Verlagsgesellschaft).
153. Heiliger, A (1994), ‘Alleinerziehen als emanzipatorische Chance für Frauen’, in R. Simsa (e.d.).
154. Henze, G. and Klar, C. (1996), ‘Einstellungen zur Erwerbstätigkeit und Vereinbarkeit mit der Familie’, in W. Bien (ed.).
155. Höpflinger, F. and Erni-Scheuwly, D. (eds.)(1989), Werteinstellungen, Lebensformen im Wandel und Lebenslagen junger Frauen (Bern: Haupt).
156. Hoff, A. (2001), ‘How do individuals mobilise support in emergencies’, Marie Curie Research Annals 2, November. accessed on 10 July 2006.
157. Hoffmann-Nowotny, H.-J. (1989), ‘Die Zukunft der Beziehungsformen – Die Beziehungsformen der Zukunft’, in F. Höpflinger and D. Erni-Scheuwly (eds.).
158. Hogarth, T., Hasluck, C., Pierre, G., Winterbotham, M. and Vivian, D. (2000), Work- Life Balance: Baseline study of work-life balance practices in Great Britain, Institute for Employment Research (Warwick: University of Warwick).
159. Hoyle, R. H., Harris, M. J. and Judd, C. M. (2002), Research Methods in Social Relations, 7th edition. (Stamford: Wadsworth).
160. Hübner-Funk, S. (ed.) (2004), Research in Progress: Selected Studies of the German Youth Institute, German Youth Institute, DJI International Series 1 (München: DJI International Series 1).
161. Humphrey, R. (ed.) (1996), Families Behind the Headlines (Newcastle: University of Newcastle upon Tyne).
162. Huth, S., Großmann, H. and Schallhöfer, P. (1996), ‘Alleinerziehend in Ost und West, eine familiale Lebensform mit Risiken’, Leviathan 24:3, 412–31.
163. Irwin, S. (2000), Conceptualising Social Change: Family, Work and the Changing Pattern of Social Reproduction, ESRC Research Group on Care, Values and the Future of Welfare, Workshop Paper 7a. (Leeds: University of Leeds).
164. Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P.-F. and Zeisel, H. (1971), Marienthal – The Sociography of an Unemployed Community (Chicago: Aldine Atherton).
165. Jamieson, L. (1999), ‘Intimacy transformed? A critical look at the ‘pure’ relationship’, Sociology 33:3, 477–94.
166. Jones, C. (ed.) (1993), New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe (London: Routledge).
167. Joshi, H. (1990), ‘Obstacles and opportunities for lone parents as breadwinners in Great Britain’, in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (ed.).
168. Junge, M. (2002), Individualisierung (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag).
169. Kameraman, S. B. and Kahn, A. J. (1988), Mothers Alone – Strategies for a Time of Change (Dover: Auburn House Publishing Company).
170. Kaufmann, F.- X. (1995),Zukunft der Familie im vereinten Deutschland: Gesellschaftliche und politische Bedingungen (München: Beck).
171. Keiser, S. (1997),Ostdeutsche Frauen zwischen Individualisierung und Re- traditionalisierung – Ein Generationenvergleich (Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac).
172. Keränen, M. (1997), Social Problems in Different Contexts, Gender Institute, Discussion Paper 4. (London: London School of Economics).
173. Kiernan, K. E., Lewis, J. and Land, H. (1998), Lone Motherhood in Twentieth- century Britain: from Footnote to Front Page (New York: Clarendon Press).
174. Kjeldstad, R. and Ronsen, M. (2005), ‘Welfare use, business cycles, and employment dynamics among lone parents in Norway’, in R. Albelda et al. (eds.).
175. Klett-Davies, M. (1997), ‘Single mothers in Germany: supported mothers who work’, in S. Duncan and R. Edwards (eds.).
176. Klett-Davies, M (2005), ‘The diversity of state benefit dependent lone mothers: The use of type categories as an analytical tool’, Sociological Research Online 10:1, accessed on 10 July 2006.
177. Knight, G. and Thomas, A. (2006), LPWFI and Review Meetings – Administrative Data Analyses and Qualitative Evidence: Final Report, Department of Work and Pensions, Research Report 315. (Leeds: Corporate Document Services).
178. Kolinsky, E. and Nickel, H. (eds.) (2003), Reinventing Gender: Women in Eastern Germany Since Unification (Portland: Frank Cass).
179. Koppetsch, C. and Maier, M. S. (1998), ‘Individualisierung ohne Gleichheit? Zur aktuellen Lage des Geschlechterverhältnisses’, in J. Friedrichs (ed.).
180. Kosmann, M., Neubauer, J., Schultz, A. and Wunderlich, H. (2003), Alleinerziehende im Sozialhilfebezug – Risiken und Chances im Leben zwischen Familie und Erwerbstaetigkeit, Endbericht. (Bochum: Zentrum für interdisziplinäre Ruhrgebietsforschung).
181. Land, H. (1994), ‘The demise of the male breadwinner – in practice but not in theory: a challenge for social security systems’, in S. Baldwin and J. Falkingham (eds.).
182. Lawler, S. (1999), ‘Children need but mothers only want: the power of ‘Needs Talk’ in the constitution of childhood’, in J. Seymour and P. Bagguley (eds.).
183. Lehmann, P. and Wirtz, C. (2004), ‘Household formation in the EU – Lone parents’, Statistics in Focus – Population and Social Conditions 3:5, 1–7.
184. Leibfried, S. (1993), ‘Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European Community’, in C. Jones (ed.).
185. Leisering, L. (1998), ‘Sozialstaat und Individualisierung’, in J. Friedrichs (ed.).
186. Leisering, L. and Leibfried, S. (1999), Time and Poverty in Western Welfare States: United Germany in Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
187. Letablier, M.-T. and Hantrais, L. (eds.) (1994), The Family–Employment Relationship, Cross-National Research Group, Fourth Series. (Loughborough: University of Technology).
188. Lewis, J. (ed.) (1993), Women and Social Policies in Europe (Aldershot: Edward Elgar).
189. Lewis, J (ed.) (1997), Lone Mothers in European Welfare State Regimes (London: Jessica Kingsley).
190. Lewis, J (2001),The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing).
191. Lewis, J (2002), ‘Gender and Welfare State Change’, European Societies 4:4, 331–57.
192. Liebecke, H. (1994), ‘Heiraten, irgendwann schon… – Alleinerziehen im Osten’, in B.Bütow and H. Stecker (eds.).
193. Lister, R. (1994), ‘She has other duties – women, citizenship and social security’, in S. Baldwin and J. Falkingham (eds.).
194. Lister, R (2000), ‘Strategies for social inclusion: promoting social cohesion or social justice?’, in P. Askonas and A. Stewart (eds.).
195. Macran, S., Joshi, H. and Dex, S. (1996), ‘Employment after childbearing: a survival analysis’, Work, Employment and Society 10:2, 273–96.
196. Mädje, E. and Neusüß, C. (1994a),Frauen im Sozialstaat: Subjektive Deutungen, Orientierungen und staatliches Handeln am Beispiel alleinerziehender Sozialhilfeempfängerinnen, Dissertation. (Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin).
197. Mädje, E. and Neusüß, C (1994b),‘Lone mothers on welfare in West Berlin: disadvantaged citizens or women avoiding patriarchy?’, Environment and Planning A 26, 1419–33.
198. Mählmann, M. (1998), Alleinerziehen als Folge gesellschaftlicher Umbrüche”, Dissertation. (Bremen: Hochschule Bremen).
199. Maleck-Lewy, E. (1995), ‘Between self–determination and state supervision: women and the abortion law in post–unification Germany’, Social Politics Spring, 62–75.
200. Marsh, A. and Vegeris, S. (2004), The British Lone Parent Cohort and Their Children 1999–2001, Department of Work and Pensions, Research Report 209. (Leeds: Cooperative Document Services).
201. McKay, S. and Marsh, A. (1994), Lone Parents and Work – the Effects of Benefits and Maintenance, Department of Social Security, Research Report 25. (London: HMSO).
202. Maynard, M. and Purvis, J. (eds.) (1994), Researching Women ‘s Lives from a Feminist Perspective (London: Taylor and Francis).
203. Meyer, S. and Schulze, E. (1989),Balancen des Glücks – Neue Lebensformen: Paare ohne Trauschein, Alleinerziehende und Singles(München: Beck).
204. Meyer, T. (1996), ‘Ausgerechnet jetzt. Űber die Einführung des Rechtsanspruches auf einen Kindergartenplatz in der Krise des Sozialstaates’, Diskurs 2, 62–67.
205. Miles, M. and Huberman, A. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Thousand Oaks: Sage).
206. Millar, J. (1994), ‘Lone parents and Social Security policy in the UK’, in S. Baldwin and J. Falkingham (eds.).
207. Millar, J (1996), ‘Mothers, workers, wives – policy approaches to supporting lone mothers in comparative perspective’, in E. B. Silva (ed.).
208. Millar, J (1998), ‘Policy and changing family forms: placing lone parenthood in context’, paper presented to the seminar ‘Current European Research on lone mothers’, Göteborg University, April.
209. Millar, J. and Ridge, T. (2001), Families, poverty, work and care, Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report 153. (Leeds: Corporate Document Services).
210. Miller, T. (2005), Making Sense of Motherhood – A Narrative Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
211. Moore, H. (1994), A Passion for Difference: Essays on Anthropology and Gender(Cambridge: Polity Press).
212. Morgan, D. (2002), ‘Sociological perspectives on the family’, in A. Carling et al. (eds.).
213. Morgan, P. (1995), Farewell to the Family? Public Policy and Family Breakdown in Britain and the USA (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, Health and Welfare Unit).
214. Müller, U. (1989), ‘Warum gibt es keine emanzipatorische Utopie des Mutterseins?’, in B. Schön (ed.).
215. Mulroy, E. A. (1995), The New Uprooted: Single Mothers in Urban Life (Westport: Auburn House).
216. Murray, C. (1990), The Emerging British Underclass (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, Health and Welfare Unit).
217. Murray, C (1994), Underclass: The Crisis Deepens (London: Institute of Economic Affairs, Health and Welfare Unit).
218. Napp-Peters, A. (1983), ‘Geschlechtsrollenstereotypen und ihr Einfluß auf Einstellungen zur Ein-Elternteil-Situation’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 35, 321–34.
219. Napp-Peters, A (1987), Ein-Elternteil-Familien - soziale Randgruppe oder neues familiales Selbstverständnis? (Weinheim: Juventa Verlag).
220. Nave-Herz, R. (1992a), ‘Ledige Mutterschaft: Eine alternative Lebensform?’, Zeitschrift für Sozialisationsforschung und Erziehungssoziologie 6, 219–232.
221. Nave-Herz, R (1992b), Frauen zwischen Tradition und Moderne (Bielefeld: Kleine Verlag).
222. Nave-Herz, R (1994), Familie Heute - Wandel der Familienstrukturen und Folgen für die Erziehung (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).
223. Nave-Herz, R. and Krüger, D. (1992),Ein-Eltern-Familien - eine empirische Studie zur Lebenssituation und Lebensplanung alleinerziehender Mütter und Väter (Bielefeld: Kleine Verlag).
224. Nestmann, F. and Stiehler, S. (1998),Wie allein sind Alleinerziehende? Soziale Beziehungen alleinerziehender Frauen und Männer in Ost und West(Opladen: Leske und Budrich).
225. Niepel, G. (1994a), Alleinerziehende - Abschied von einem Klischee (Opladen: Leske and Budrich).
226. Niepel, G (1994b), Soziale Netze und soziale Unterstützung alleinerziehender Frauen: Eine empirische Studie (Opladen: Leske and Budrich).
227. Noble, M., Smith, G., Cheung, S.Y., De Moor, D., Smith, T. and Whitlock, S. (1998), Lone Mothers Moving in and out of Benefits, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Work and Opportunity Series 4. (York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
228. Notz, G. (1994), ‘Frauenemanzipation und Frauenrealität in Ost und West’, in B. Bütow and H. Stecker (eds.).
229. Nussbaum, M.C and Glover, J. (eds.) (1995), Women, Culture and Development: a Study of Human Capabilities (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
230. Oakley, A. (1974), The Sociology of Housework (London: Robertson).
231. Oakley, A (1992), Social Support and Motherhood: the Natural History of a Research Project (Oxford: Blackwell).
232. OECD (ed.) (1990),Lone Parent Families - the Economic Challenge (Montreal: OECD).
233. Offe, C. (1994a), ‘A non-productivist design for social policies’, in J. Ferris and R. Page (eds.).
234. Offe, C (1994b), ‘Vollbeschäftigung? Zur Kritik einer falsch gestellten Frage’, Gerwerkschaftliche Montashefte 45:129, 76–806.
235. Okin, S. M. (1995), ‘Inequalities between the sexes in different cultural contexts’, in M. C. Nussbaum and J. Glover (eds.).
236. O’Reilly, J. and Fagan, C. (eds.) (1998), Part-Time Prospects (London: Routledge).
237. Ostner, I. (1993), ‘Slow motion: women, work and the family in Germany’, in J. Lewis (ed.).
238. Ott, N. (2001), ‘Die sozialpolitische Situation von Alleinerziehenden und spezifische Belastungen’, in Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (ed.).
239. Parsons, T. (1971), The System of Modern Societies (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice– Hall).
240. Perrons, D. (1998), ‘Flexible employment and the reconciliation of work and family life’, paper presented to the ESRC Seminar Series ‘Parenting, Motherhood and Paid Work’, University of Bradford, 16–17 September.
241. Perrons, D., Fagan, C., McDowell, L., Ray, K. and Ward, K. (eds.) (2006), Gender Divisions and Working Time in the New Economy (Cheltenham: Edwards Elgar Publishing).
242. Pfau-Effinger, B. (1994), ‘The gender contract and part-time paid work by women - Finland and Germany compared’, Environment and Planning A 26, 1355–76.
243. Pfau-Effinger, B (1998), ‘Gender cultures and the gender arrangement – a theoretical framework for cross-national gender research’, Innovation 11:2, 147–62.
244. Pfau-Effinger, B (2005), ‘Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangements’, European Societies 7:2, 321–47.
245. Pfau-Effinger, B. and Geissler, B. (2002), ‘Cultural change and family policies in East and West-Germany’, in A. Carling et al. (eds.).
246. Phizacklea, A. and Wolkowitz, C. (1995), Homeworking Women: Gender, Racism and Class at Work (London: Sage).
247. Phoenix, A. (1994), ‘Practicing feminist research: the intersection of gender and “race” in the research process’, in M. Maynard and J. Purvis (eds.).
248. Phoenix, A (1996), ‘Social constructions of lone motherhood – a case of competing discourses’, in E. B. Silva (ed.).
249. Pinl, C. (2003), ‘Uralt, aber immer noch ruestig: der deutsche Ernaehrer’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 44, 6–8.
250. Quack, S. and Maier, F. (1994), ‘From state socialism to market economy - women's employment in East Germany’, Environment and Planning A 26, 1257–76.
251. Rerrich, M. S. (1994), ‘Zusammenfügen, was auseinanderstrebt: Zur familialen Lebensführung von Berufstätigen’, in U. Beck and E. Beck-Gernsheim (eds.).
252. Reuter, W. (ed.) (2004), Germany on the Road to Normalcy (London: Palgrave/MacMillan).
253. Reynolds, T. (1998), ‘African–Caribbean mothering, paid work and identity’, paper presented to the ESRC Seminar Series ‘Parenting, Motherhood and Paid Work’, University of Bradford, 16–17 September.
254. Reynolds, T (2002), ‘Re-analysing the Black family’, in A. Carling et al. (eds.).
255. Ribbens, J. (1994),Mothers and Their Children: a Feminist Sociology of Childrearing(London: Sage).
256. Ribbens, J(1998), ‘Hearing my feeling voice? An autobiographical discussion of motherhood’, in J. Ribbens and R. Edwards (eds.).
257. Ribbens, J. and Edwards, R. (eds.) (1998), Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research (London: Sage).
258. Ribbens-McCarthy, J., Edwards, R. and Gillies, V. (2003), Making Families: Moral Tales of Parenting andStep–parenting (Durham: Sociology Press).
259. Rich, A. (1977),Of Women Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution(London: Virago).
260. Ridge, T. (2004), ‘Supporting children? The impact of child support policies on children's wellbeing in the UK and Australia’, Journal of Social Policy 34:1, 121–42.
261. Rose, N. (1996), ‘Authority and the genealogy of subjectivity’, in P. Heelas et al. (eds.).
262. Rosenfeld, R., Trappe, H. and Gornick, J. (2004), ‘Gender and work in Germany: Before and after reunification’, Annual Review of Sociology 30, 103–124.
263. Rowlingson, K. and McKay, S. (1998), The Growth of Lone Parenthood – Diversity and Dynamics (London: Policy Studies Institute).
264. Rowlingson, K. and McKay, S. (2005), ‘Lone motherhood and socio-economic disadvantage: insights from quantitative and qualitative evidence’, Sociological Review 53:1, 30–60.
265. Rubery, J. (1998), ‘Part-time work: a threat to labour standards?’, in J. O’Reilly and C.Fagan (eds.).
266. Ruddick, S. (1980), ‘Maternal thinking’, Feminist Studies 6:2, 342–67.
267. Ruspini, E. (1998), Living on the Poverty Line: Lone Mothers in Belgium, Germany, Italy, Sweden and Great Britain, Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, Working Paper 28. accessed on 10 July 2006.
268. Sackmann, R. (2000), ‘Living through the myths – gender, values, attitudes and practices’, in S. Duncan and B. Pfau-Effinger (eds.).
269. Sainsbury, D. (1996), Gender, Equality and Welfare States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
270. Sayer, A. (1992), Method in Social Science – A Realist Approach, 2nd edition. (London: Routledge).
271. Schenk, S. (2003), ‘Employment opportunities and labour market exclusion: towards a new pattern of gender stratification?’, in E. Kolinsky and H. Nickel (eds.).
272. Schilling, C. (1997), ‘The under–socialised conception of the embodied agent in modern sociology’, Sociology 31:4, 737–54.
273. Schneider, N., Krüger, D., Lasch, V., Limmer, R. and Matthias-Bleck, H. (2001), Alleinerziehen. Vielfalt und Dynamik einer Lebensform (Weinheim: Juventa Verlag).
274. Schön, B. (ed.) (1989), Emanzipation und Mutterschaft (Weinheim: Juventa Verlag).
275. Schülein, J. A. (1994), ‘Zur Entwicklung des familären Zusammenslebens: Von der Űberlebensgruppe zur individualisierten Beziehungsgemeinschaft’, in R. Simsa (ed.).
276. Schülein, J. A. and Simsa, R. (1994), ‘Zur Diskriminierung von Einelternfamilien in Gesellschaft und Forschung’, in R. Simsa (ed.).
277. Schütze, Y. (1991),Die gute Mutter – Zur Geschichte des normativen Musters, Mutterliebe’(Bielefeld: Kleine Verlag).
278. Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2004), ‘Continuity or change: Red-Green social policy after sixteen years of Christian Democratic rule’, in W. Reuter (ed.).
279. Sennett, R. (1998),The Corrosion of Character: the Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism(New York: Norton).
280. Sevenhuijsen, S. (2002), ‘A third way? Moralities, ethics and families: An approach through the ethic of care’, in A. Carling et al. (eds.).
281. Seymour, J. and Bagguley, P. (eds.) (1999), Relating Intimacies – Power and Resistance (Basingstoke: MacMillan Press).
282. Silva, E. B. (ed.) (1996),Good Enough Mothering – Feminist Perspectives on Lone Motherhood (London: Routledge).
283. Silva, E. B. and Smart, C. (eds.) (1999), The New Family (London: Sage).
284. Simsa, R. (ed.) (1994), Kein Herr im Haus (Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer).
285. Sinha, R. (1998), The Cultural Adjustment of Asian Lone Mothers Living in London(London: Ashgate).
286. Smart, C. (ed.) (1993), Regulating Womanhood: Historical Essays on Marriage, Motherhood and Sexuality(London: Routledge).
287. Smart, C. and Shipman, B. (2004), ‘Visions in monochrome: families, marriage and the individualization thesis’, The British Journal of Sociology 55:4, 491–509.
288. Smart, C. and Neale, B. (1999), Family Fragments? (Cambridge: Polity Press).
289. Sorensen, A. and Trappe, H. (1995), ‘The persistence of gender inequality in earnings in the German Democratic Republic’, American Sociological Review 60:June, 398–406.
290. Southwark Council (1996), The Southwark Poverty Profile – Indicators of Poverty and Deprivation in Southwark (London: Southwark Regeneration and Environment Department).
291. Speak, S. (2000), ‘Barriers to lone parent's employment’, Local Economy 15:1, 32–44.
292. Spensky, C. (1993), ‘Producers of legitimacy – homes for unmarried mothers in the 1950s’, in C. Smart (ed.).
293. Staat, M. and Wagenhals, G. (1993), The labour supply of lone mothers in the Federal Republic of Germany, Diskussionsbeitrag 82. (Stuttgart: Universität Hohenheim)
294. Staat, M. and Wagenhals, G (1994), ‘The labour supply of German single mothers: a bivariate probit model’, Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsordnung 1:2, 113–118.
295. Stanley, L. and Wise, S. (1993), Breaking Out Again – Feminist Ontology and Epistemology, (New York: Routledge).
296. Statistisches Bundesamt (2006), Unpublished Tables from Mikrozensus Data(Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt).
297. Stewart, A. (2000), ‘Social inclusion: an introduction’, in P. Askonas and A. Stewart (eds.) (2000).
298. Strohmeier, K. P. (1993), ‘Pluralisierung und Polarisierung der Lebensformen in Deutschland’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 17, 11–22.
299. Strohmeier, K. and Kersting, V. (2003), ‘Segregierte Armut in der Stadtgesellschaft’, Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 3:4, 231–35.
300. Sullivan, M. (1996), The Development of the British Welfare State (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
301. Szypkowski, B. (1997), Die Kontinuität der guten Mutter (Pfaffenweiler: CentaurusVerlagsgesellschaft).
302. The Economist (2002), ‘Cost-of-Living Index’, The Economist, 24 January.
303. Thomas, H. and Klett-Davies, M. (1995), Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value, Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths’ College (London: University of London).
304. Thurley, D. (ed.) (2003),Working to Target: Can Policies Deliver Paid Work for Seven in Ten Lone Parents? (London: One Parent Families).
305. Veil, M. (2003), ‘Kinderbetreuungskulturen in Europa: Schweden, Frankreick, Deutschland’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 44, 12–22.
306. Vetter, H., Richter, G. and Seil, K. (eds.) (2002), Lebenslage Alleinerziehen – Theoretische Modelle und International Perspektiven (München: Rainer Hamp Verlag).
307. Wagner, S. (1999),Familien und Soziale Ungleichheit – Deutschland und Großbritannien im Vergleich (München: tuduv Verlag).
308. Walby, S. (1990), Theorising Patriarchy (Oxford: Blackwell).
309. Walker, J. (1996), ‘Changing families’, in R. Humphrey (ed.).
310. Walther, U.J. (1992), Wohnsituation Alleinerziehender, Materialien zur Raumentwicklung 43. (Bonn: Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landeskunde und Raumordnung).
311. Walling, A. (2005), ‘Families and work’, Labour Market Trends, July, 275–283.
312. Whyte, W. F. (1984),Learning from the Field – A Guide from Experience(London: Sage).
313. Williams, F. (1993), ‘Gender, ‘race’ and class in British welfare policy’, in A. Cochrane and J. Clarke (eds.).
314. Wilson, M. (1993), ‘The German welfare state: a conservative regime in crisis’, in A. Cochrane and J. Clarke (eds.).
315. Winterborn, M. (1990), ‘Single mother’, New Statesman and Society, 26 January, 10–11.
316. Yin, R. K. (2003),Case Study Research – Design and Methods (London: Sage).
317. Zulauf, M. (1997), ‘Mother and baby hostels: A viable option for young single mothers?’, Research, Policy and Planning 15:1, 13–18.