Perspectives for very high-resolution climate simulations with nested models: Illustration of potential in simulating St. Lawrence river valley channelling winds with the fifth-generation Canadian regional climate model

Climate

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 283-307

  Cholette, Mélissa ^a   Laprise, René ^a   Thériault, Julie Mireille ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canadian regional climate model; Cascade; Grid telescoping; Regional climate modeling; St. lawrence river valley winds; Very high resolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937524264     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22251154     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/cli3020283     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Parry, M.L.; Canziani, O.F.; Palutikof, J.P.; van der Linden, P.J.; Hanson, C.E. IPCC: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; p. 976.
2. IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis; Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y.; Bex, V., Midgley, P.M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013; p. 1535.
3. Mearns, L.O.; Schneider, S.H.; Thompson, S.L.; McDaniel, L.R. Analysis of climate variability in General Circulation Models: Comparison with observations and changes in variability in 2×CO2 experiments. J. Geophys. Res. 1990, 95, 20469-20520.
4. Christensen, J.H.; Hewitson, B.; Busuioc, A.; Chen, A.; Gao, X.; Held, I.; Jones, R.; Kolli, R.K.; Kwon, W.-T.; Laprise, R.; et al. Regional climate projections. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I (WGI) to the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
5. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, X., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., Miller, H.L., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 918-925.
6. Giorgi, F.; Coppola, E. Does the model regional bias affect the projected regional climate change? An analysis of global model projections. Clim. Chang. 2010, 100, 787-795.
7. Dickinson, R.E.; Errico, R.M.; Giorgi, F.; Bates, G.T. A regional climate model for the western United States. Clim. Chang. 1989, 15, 383-422.
8. Giorgi, F. Simulation of regional climate using a limited area model nested in a general circulation model. J. Clim. 1990, 3, 941-963.
9. Von Storch, H.; Langenberg, H.; Feser, F. A spectral nudging technique for dynamical downscaling purposes. Mon. Weather Rev. 2000, 128, 3664-3673.
10. Nikulin, G.; Jones, C.; Giorgi, F.; Asrar, G.; Büchner, M.; Cerezo-Mota, R.; Christensen, O.B.; Déqué, M.; Fernandez, J.; Hänsler, A.; et al. Precipitation climatology in an ensemble of CORDEX-Africa regional climate simulations. J. Clim. 2012, 25, 6057-6078.
11. Giorgi, F. Future directions for CORDEX: Emerging issues concerning Regional climate projections. In Proceedings of the ICRC 2013, Brussels, Belgium, 4-7 November 2013.
12. Hong, S.-Y.; Kanamitsu, M. Dynamical downscaling: Fundamental issue from an NWP point of view and recommendations. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 2014, 50, 83-104.
13. Kendon, E.J.; Roberts, N.M.; Senior, C.A.; Roberts, M.J. Realism of rainfall in a very high-resolution regional climate model. J. Clim. 2012, 25, 5791-5806.
14. Ban, N.; Schmidli, J.; Schär, C. Evaluation of the convection-resolving regional climate modeling approach in decade-long simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.. 2014, 119, 7889-7907.
15. Jacob, D.; Petersen, J.; Eggert, B.; Alias, A.; Christensen, O.B., Bouwer, L.M., Braun, A.; Colette, A.; Déqué, M.; Georgievski, G.; et al. EURO-CORDEX: New high-reolution climate change projections for European impact research. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2014, 14, 563-578.
16. Lucas-Picher, P.; Riboust, P.; Somot, S.; Laprise, R. Reconstruction of the spring 2011 Richelieu River flood by two regional climate models and a hydrological model. J. Hydrometeor. 2014, doi: 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0116.1.
17. Hart, K.A.; Steenburgh, W.J.; Onton, D.J. Model forecast improvements with decreased horizontal grid spacing over finescale intermountain orography during the 2002 Olympic Winter Games. Weather Forecast. 2005, 20, 558-576.
18. Lean, H.W.; Clark, P.A.; Dixon, M.; Roberts, N.M.; Fitch, A.; Forbes, R.; Halliwell, C. Characteristics of high-resolution versions of the Met Office Unified Model for forecasting convection over the United Kingdom. Mon. Weather Rev. 2008, 136, 3408-3424.
19. Mailhot, J.; Milbrandt, J.A.; Giguère, A.; McTaggart-Cowan, R.; Erfani, A.; Denis, B.; Glazer, A.; Vallée, M. An experimental high resolution forecast system during the Vancouver 2010 winter Olympic and Paralympic games. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2014, 171, 209-229.
20. Coen, J.; Cameron, M.; Michalakes, J.; Patton, E.; Riggan, P.; Yedinak, K. WRF-fire: Coupled weather-wildland fire modeling with the weather research and forecasting model. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. 2013, 52, 16-38.
21. Trapp, R.J.; Halvorson, B.A.; Diffenbaugh, N.S. Telescoping, multimodel approaches to evaluate extreme convective weather under future climates. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, 112, 1-13.
22. Prein, A.F.; Truhetz, H.; Suklistch, M.; Gobiet, A. Evaluation of the Local Climate Model Intercomparison Project (LocMIP) simulations. WegCenter Rep. 2011, 41, 27-57.
23. Stiperski, I.; Ivančan-Picek, B.; Grubišić, V.; Bajić, A. Complex bora flow in the lee of southern velebit. Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2012, 138, 1490-1506.
24. Mahoney, K.; Alexander, M.; Scott, J.D.; Barsugli, J. High-resolution downscaled simulations of warm-season extreme precipitation events in the Colorado Front Range under past and future climates. J. Clim. 2013, 26, 8671-8689.
25. Wang, C.; Jones, R.; Perry, M.; Johnson, C.; Clark, P. Using ultrahigh-resolution regional climate model to predict local climatology. Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2013, doi: 10.1002/qj.2081.
26. Yeung, J.K.; Smith, J.A.; Villarini, G.; Ntelekos, A.A.; Baeck, M.L.; Krajewski, W.F. Analyses of the warm season rainfall climatology of the northeastern US using regional climate model simulations and radar rainfall fields. Adv. Water Resour. 2011, 34, 184-204.
27. BALTEX: The Baltic Sea Experiment: 3rd Lund Regional-scale Climate Modelling Workshop, 21st Century Challenges in Regional Climate Modelling, Lund, Sweden, 16-19 June 2014. Available online: http://www.baltex-research.eu/RCM2014/(accessed on 19 December 2014).
28. Leduc, M.; Laprise, R. Regional Climate Model sensitivity to domain size. Clim. Dyn. 2009, 32, 833-854.
29. Hill, G.E. Grid telescoping in numerical weather prediction. J. Appl. Meteor. 1968, 7, 29-38.
30. Chen, J.H.; Miyakoda, K. A nested grid computation for the barotropic free surface atmosphere. Mon. Weather Rev. 1974, 102, 181-190.
31. Rife, D.L.; Davis, C.A.; Knievel, J.C. Temporal changes in wind as objects for evaluating mesoscale numerical weather prediction. Weather Forecast. 2009, 24, 1374-1389.
32. Roebber, P.J.; Gyakum. J.R. Orographic influences on the mesoscale structure of the 1998 ice storm. Mon. Weather Rev. 2003, 131, 27-50.
33. Hernández-Díaz, L.; Laprise, R.; Sushama, L.; Martynov, A.; Winger, K.; Dugas, B. Climate simulation over CORDEX Africa domain using the fifth-generation Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM5). Clim. Dyn. 2013, 40, 1415-1433.
34. Martynov, A.; Laprise, R.; Sushama, L.; Winger, K.; Šeparović, L.; Dugas, B. Reanalysis-driven climate simulation over CORDEX North America domain using the Canadian Regional Climate Model, version 5: Model performance evaluation. Clim. Dyn. 2013, 41, 2973-3005.
35. Šeparović, L.; Alexandru, A.; Laprise, R.; Martynov, A.; Sushama, L.; Winger, K.; Tete, K.; Valin, M. Present climate and climate change over North America as simulated by the fifth-generation Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM5). Clim. Dyn. 2013, 41, 3167-3201.
36. Côté, J.; Gravel, S.; Méthot, A.; Patoine, A.; Roch, M.; Staniforth, A. The operational CMC-MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model: Part I-Design considerations and formulation. Mon. Weather Rev. 1998, 126, 1373-1395.
37. Côté, J.; Desmarais, J.-G.; Gravel, S.; Méthot, A.; Patoine, A.; Roch, M.; Staniforth, A. The operational CMC-MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model: Part II-Results. Mon. Weather Rev. 1998, 126, 1397-1418.
38. Yeh, K.S.; Gravel, S.; Méthot, A.; Patoine, A.; Roch, M.; Staniforth, A. The CMC-MRB global environmental multiscale (GEM) model. Part III: Non-hydrostatic formulation. Mon. Weather Rev. 2002, 130, 339-356.
39. Laprise, R. The Euler equation of motion with hydrostatic pressure as independent coordinate. Mon. Weather Rev. 1992, 120, 197-207.
40. Davies, H.C. A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1976, 102, 405-418.
41. Verseghy, D.L. The Canadian land surface scheme (CLASS): Its history and future. Atm.-Ocean 2000, 38, 1-13.
42. Verseghy, D.L. The Canadian Land Surface Scheme: Technical Documentation, Version 3.4; Climate Research Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada: Dorval, QC, Canada, 2008.
43. Li, J.; Barker, H.W. A radiation algorithm with correlated-k distribution. Part-I: Local thermal equilibrium. J. Atmos. Sci. 2005, 62, 286-309.
44. Benoit, R.; Côté, J.; Mailhot, J. Inclusion of TKE boundary layer parameterization in the Canadian Regional Finite-Element Model. Mon. Weather Rev. 1989, 117, 1726-1750.
45. Delage, Y.; Girard, C. Stability functions correct at the free convection limit and consistent for both the surface and Ekman layers. Bound. Layer Meteor. 1992, 58, 19-31.
46. Delage, Y. Parameterising sub-grid scale vertical transport in atmospheric models under statically stable conditions. Bound. Layer Meteor. 1997, 82, 23-48.
47. Tiedtke, M. A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon. Weather Rev. 1989, 117, 1779-1800.
48. Kuo, H.L. On formation and intensification of tropical cyclones through latent heat release by cumulus convection. J. Atmos. Sci. 1965, 22, 40-63.
49. Bélair, S.; Mailhot, J.; Girard, C.; Vaillancourt, P. Boundary-layer and shallow cumulus clouds in a medium-range forecast of a large-scale weather system. Mon. Weather Rev. 2005, 133, 1938-1960.
50. Molinari, J.; Dudek, M. Parameterization of convective precipitation in mesoscale numerical models: A critical review. Mon. Weather Rev. 1992, 120, 326-344.
51. Arakawa, A. The cumulus parameterization problem: Past, present and future. J. Clim. 2004, 17, 2493-2525.
52. Piriou, J.M.; Redelsperger, J.-L.; Geleyn, J.-F.; Lafore, J.-P.; Guichard, F. An approach for convective parameterization with memory: Separating microphysics and transport in grid-scale equations. J. Atmos. Sci. 2007, 64, 4127-4139.
53. Gérard, L. An integrated package for subgrid convection, clouds and precipitation compatible with meso-gamma scales. Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2007, 133, 711-730.
54. Gérard, L.; Piriou, J.M.; Brožková, R.; Geleyn, J.-F.; Banciu, D. Cloud and precipitation parameterization in a meso-gamma-scale operational weather prediction model. Mon. Weather Rev. 2009, 137, 3960-3977.
55. Bengtsson, L.; Steinheimer, M.; Bechtold, P.; Geleyn, J.-F. A stochastic parametrization for deep convection using cellular automata. Quart. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2013, 139, 1533-1543.
56. Sundqvist, H.; Berge, E.; Kristjansson, J.E. Condensation and cloud parameterization studies with a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model. Mon. Weather Rev. 1989, 117, 1641-1657.
57. Bourgouin, P. A method to determine precipitation types. Weather Forecast. 2000, 15, 583-592.
58. Kain, J.S.; Fritsch, J.M. A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and application in convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci. 1990, 47, 2784-2802.
59. McFarlane, N.A. The effect of orographically excited gravity-wave drag on the circulation of the lower stratosphere and troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 1987, 44, 1175-1800.
60. Zadra, A.; Roch, M.; Laroche, S.; Charron, M. The subgrid-scale orographic blocking parametrization of the GEM Model. Atm.-Ocean 2003, 41, 155-170.
61. Milbrandt, J.A.; Yau, M.K. A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the role of the spectral shape parameter. J. Atmos. Sci. 2005, 62, 3051-3064.
62. Milbrandt, J.A.; Yau, M.K. A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part II: A proposed three-moment closure and scheme description. J. Atmos. Sci. 2005, 62, 3065-3081.
63. Simmons, A.; Uppala, S.; Dee, D.; Kobayashi, S. ERA-Interim: New ECMWF reanalysis products from 1989 onwards. ECMWF Newslett. 2007, 110, 26-35.
64. Boer, G.J. Predictability regimes in atmospheric flow. Mon. Weather Rev. 1994, 122, 2285-2295.
65. Lilly, D.K.; Bassett, G.; Droegemeier, K.; Bartello, P. Stratified turbulence in the atmospheric mesoscales. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 1998, 11, 139-153.
66. Pielke, R.A. A recommended specific definition of "resolution". Agric. For. Meteorol. 1991, 55, 345-349.
67. De Elía, R.; Laprise, R.; Denis, B. Forecasting skill limits of nested, limited-area models: A perfect-model approach. Mon. Weather Rev. 2002, 130, 2006-2023.
68. Charney, J.G. Geostrophic turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci. 1971, 28, 1087-1095.
69. Boer, G.J.; Shepherd, T.G. Large-scale two-dimensional turbulence in the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 1983, 40, 164-184.
70. Nastrom, G.D.; Gage, K.S. A climatology of atmospheric wavenumber spectra of wind and temperature observed by commercial aircraft. J. Atmos. Sci. 1985, 42, 950-960.
71. Gage, K.S.; Nastrom, G.D. Theoretical interpretation of atmospheric wavenumber spectra of wind and temperature observed by commercial aircraft during GASP. J. Atmos. Sci. 1986, 43, 729-740.
72. Denis, B.; Côté, J.; Laprise, R. Spectral decomposition of two-dimensional atmospheric fields on limited-area domains using the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT). Mon. Weather Rev. 2002, 130, 1812-1829.
73. Skamarock, W.C. Evaluating mesoscale NWP models using kinetic energy spectra. Mon. Weather Rev. 2004, 132, 3019-3032.
74. Durran, D.R. Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: With Applications to Geophysics; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; Volume 32, p. 516.
75. Leith, C.E. Diffusion approximation for two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 1968, 11, 671-673.
76. Koshyk, J.N.; Hamilton, K. The horizontal kinetic energy spectrum and spectral budget simulated by high-resolution troposphere-stratosphere-mesosphere GCM. J. Atmos. Sci. 2001, 58, 329-348.
77. Historical Climate Data. Available online: http://climate.weather.gc.ca/advanceSearch/searchHistoricData_e.html/(accessed on 25 March 2015).
78. Cholette, M. Méthode de Télescopage Appliquée au MRCC5 Pour une Étude de Faisabilité d'un Modèle Régional de Climat de Très Haute Résolution. M.Sc. Dissertation, Department Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2013; p. 101.
79. Carrera, M.L.; Gyakum, J.R.; Lin, C.A. Observational study of wind channeling within the St-Lawrence River valley. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. 2009, 48, 2341-2361.
80. MétéoCentre: Centre Météo UQAM Montréal | La météo en temps réel pour le Québec, le Canada, les États-Unis et l'Europe. Available online: http://meteocentre.com/(accessed on 26 March 2015).
81. Thériault, J.M.; Stewart, R. A parameterization of the microphysical processes forming many types of winter precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci. 2010, 67, 1492-1508.
82. University of Wyoming, College of Engineering, Department of Atmospheric Science. Available online: http://weather.uwyo.edu/wyoming/(accessed on 25 March 2015).
83. Lindzen, R.S.; Fox-Rabinowitz, M. Consistent vertical and horizontal resolution. Mon. Weather Rev. 1989, 117, 2575-2583.
84. Robert, A. A stable numerical integration scheme for the primitive meteorological equations. Atm.-Ocean 1981, 19, 35-46.
85. Clark, T.L.; Farley, R.D. Severe downslope windstorm calculations in two and three spatial dimensions using anelastic interactive grid nesting: A possible mechanism for gustiness. J. Atmos. Sci. 1984, 41, 329-350.
86. Beck, A.; Ahrens, B.; Stadlbacher, K. Impact of nesting strategies in dynamical downscaling of reanalysis data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2004, doi: 10.1029/2004GL020115.
87. Suklitsch, M.; Gobiet, A.; Leuprecht, A.; Frei, C. High resolution sensitivity studies with the regional climate model CCLM in the Alpine Region. Meteorol. Z. 2008, 17, 467-476.
88. Denis, B.; Laprise, R.; Caya, D. Sensitivity of a regional climate model to the resolution of the lateral boundary conditions. Clim. Dyn. 2003, 20, 107-126.
89. Razy, A.; Milrad, S.M.; Atallah, E.H.; Gyakum, J.R. Synoptic-scale environments conductive to orographic impacts on cold-season surface wind regimes at Montreal, Quebec. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol. 2012, 51, 598-616