It's more than stamp collecting: How genome sequencing can unify biological research

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 411-421

  Richards, Stephen ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA sequencing; Eukaryotes; Eukaryotic genomics; Genome analysis; Genome assembly; Genome infrastructure funding; Genome reference sequences; Long read sequencing technologies; Taxanomic genome surveys; Tree of life

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOMESTICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; METABOLIC CAPACITY; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SAMPLING; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TREE OF LIFE; ANIMAL; DNA SEQUENCE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION;

EUKARYOTA;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; GENOMICS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84937523803     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 13624555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.04.007     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. Ewing B., Green P. Analysis of expressed sequence tags indicates 35,000 human genes. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25:232-234.
2. Pennisi E. Human genome. A low number wins the GeneSweep Pool. Science 2003, 300:1484.
3. Clamp M., et al. Distinguishing protein-coding and noncoding genes in the human genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:19428-19433.
4. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012, 489:57-74. Encode Project Consortium.
5. Cabili M.N., et al. Integrative annotation of human large intergenic noncoding RNAs reveals global properties and specific subclasses. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:1915-1927.
6. Yang Y., et al. Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing. JAMA 2014, 312:1870-1879.
7. Leshchiner I., et al. Mutation mapping and identification by whole-genome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012, 22:1541-1548.
8. Blumenstiel J.P., et al. Identification of EMS-induced mutations in Drosophila melanogaster by whole-genome sequencing. Genetics 2009, 182:25-32.
9. Haelterman N.A., et al. Large-scale identification of chemically induced mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res. 2014, 24:1707-1718.
10. Guo J., et al. A CLN8 nonsense mutation in the whole genome sequence of a mixed breed dog with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis and Australian Shepherd ancestry. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2014, 112:302-309.
11. Welter D., et al. The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:D1001-D1006.
12. Huang X., Han B. Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65:531-551.
13. Luo W., et al. Genome-wide association study of porcine hematological parameters in a Large White x Minzhu F2 resource population. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8:870-881.
14. Olsen H.G., et al. Genome-wide association mapping in Norwegian Red cattle identifies quantitative trait loci for fertility and milk production on BTA12. Anim. Genet. 2011, 42:466-474.
15. Navin N., et al. Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing. Nature 2011, 472:90-94.
16. Blainey P.C. The future is now: single-cell genomics of bacteria and archaea. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37:407-427.
17. Cheviron Z.A., Brumfield R.T. Genomic insights into adaptation to high-altitude environments. Heredity 2012, 108:354-361.
18. Tishkoff S.A., et al. Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:31-40.
19. Lamichhaney S., et al. Evolution of Darwin's finches and their beaks revealed by genome sequencing. Nature 2015, 518:371-375.
20. Axelsson E., et al. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 2013, 495:360-364.
21. Prufer K., et al. The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains. Nature 2014, 505:43-49.
22. Girdland Flink L., et al. Establishing the validity of domestication genes using DNA from ancient chickens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:6184-6189.
23. Orlando L., et al. Recalibrating Equus evolution using the genome sequence of an early Middle Pleistocene horse. Nature 2013, 499:74-78.
24. Zhang G., et al. Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation. Science 2014, 346:1311-1320.
25. Colbourne J.K., et al. The ecoresponsive genome of Daphnia pulex. Science 2011, 331:555-561.
26. Chipman A.D., et al. The first myriapod genome sequence reveals conservative arthropod gene content and genome organisation in the centipede Strigamia maritima. PLoS Biol. 2014, 12:e1002005.
27. Grbic M., et al. The genome of Tetranychus urticae reveals herbivorous pest adaptations. Nature 2011, 479:487-492.
28. Sanggaard K.W., et al. Spider genomes provide insight into composition and evolution of venom and silk. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:3765.
29. Simakov O., et al. Insights into bilaterian evolution from three spiralian genomes. Nature 2013, 493:526-531.
30. Pace N.R. Mapping the tree of life: progress and prospects. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2009, 73:565-576.
31. Savard J., et al. Phylogenomic analysis reveals bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) at the base of the radiation of Holometabolous insects. Genome Res. 2006, 16:1334-1338.
32. Falkowski P.G., et al. The microbial engines that drive Earth's biogeochemical cycles. Science 2008, 320:1034-1039.
33. Read B.A., et al. Pan genome of the phytoplankton Emiliania underpins its global distribution. Nature 2013, 499:209-213.
34. Gibson D.G., et al. Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 2010, 329:52-56.
35. Jones J.D., Dangl J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444:323-329.
36. Vonk F.J., et al. The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:20651-20656.
37. Warren W.C., et al. Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution. Nature 2008, 453:175-183.
38. Zhao C., et al. A massive expansion of effector genes underlies gall-formation in the wheat pest Mayetiola destructor. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25:613-620.
39. Wilson A.C., et al. Genomic insight into the amino acid relations of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, with its symbiotic bacterium Buchnera aphidicola. Insect Mol. Biol. 2010, 19(Suppl 2):249-258.
40. Foote A.D., et al. Convergent evolution of the genomes of marine mammals. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47:272-275.
41. Parker J., et al. Genome-wide signatures of convergent evolution in echolocating mammals. Nature 2013, 502:228-231.
42. Jones F.C., et al. The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 2012, 484:55-61.
43. Dehal P., Boore J.L. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e314.
44. Nossa C.W., et al. Joint assembly and genetic mapping of the Atlantic horseshoe crab genome reveals ancient whole genome duplication. Gigascience 2014, 3:9.
45. Lynch M., et al. Evolutionary cell biology: two origins, one objective. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111:16990-16994.
46. Medina M. Genomes, phylogeny, and evolutionary systems biology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102(Suppl 1):6630-6635.
47. Soyer O.S., O'Malley M.A. Evolutionary systems biology: what it is and why it matters. Bioessays 2013, 35:696-705.
48. Hirst J., et al. The fifth adaptor protein complex. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1001170.
49. Harris J.K., et al. The genetic core of the universal ancestor. Genome Res. 2003, 13:407-412.
50. Goldman A.D., et al. LUCApedia: a database for the study of ancient life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:D1079-D1082.
51. Ogura A., et al. Estimation of ancestral gene set of bilaterian animals and its implication to dynamic change of gene content in bilaterian evolution. Gene 2005, 345:65-71.
52. Waterhouse R.M., et al. Correlating traits of gene retention, sequence divergence, duplicability and essentiality in vertebrates, arthropods, and fungi. Genome Biol. Evol. 2011, 3:75-86.
53. Gehring W.J. The evolution of vision. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Dev. Biol. 2014, 3:1-40.
54. Lee M.G., Nurse P. Complementation used to clone a human homologue of the fission yeast cell cycle control gene cdc2. Nature 1987, 327:31-35.
55. Kumar S., Hedges S.B. TimeTree2: species divergence times on the iPhone. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:2023-2024.
56. Prussing K., et al. Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism for Alzheimer's disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2013, 8:35.
57. Barria M.A., et al. Exploring the zoonotic potential of animal prion diseases: in vivo and in vitro approaches. Prion 2014, 8:85-91.
58. Kettleborough R.N., et al. A systematic genome-wide analysis of zebrafish protein-coding gene function. Nature 2013, 496:494-497.
59. Bellen H.J., et al. The Drosophila gene disruption project: progress using transposons with distinctive site specificities. Genetics 2011, 188:731-743.
60. Bradley A., et al. The mammalian gene function resource: the International Knockout Mouse Consortium. Mamm. Genome 2012, 23:580-586.
61. Thompson O., et al. The million mutation project: a new approach to genetics in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Res. 2013, 23:1749-1762.
62. Giaever G., et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 2002, 418:387-391.
63. iBeetle-Consortium (2014) IBeetle-Base.
64. Barsh G.S., Andersson L. Evolutionary genomics: detecting selection. Nature 2013, 495:325-326.
65. Nielsen R., Hubisz M.J. Evolutionary genomics: detecting selection needs comparative data. Nature 2005, 433:E6-E8.
66. Prabhakar S., et al. Human-specific gain of function in a developmental enhancer. Science 2008, 321:1346-1350.
67. Preuss T.M. Human brain evolution: from gene discovery to phenotype discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109(Suppl 1):10709-10716.
68. Lindblad-Toh K., et al. A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals. Nature 2011, 478:476-482.
69. Finn R.D., et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:D211-D222.
70. Adzhubei I.A., et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:248-249.
71. Kumar P., et al. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4:1073-1081.
72. Mihalek I., et al. A family of evolution-entropy hybrid methods for ranking protein residues by importance. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 336:1265-1282.
73. Katsonis P., Lichtarge O. A formal perturbation equation between genotype and phenotype determines the evolutionary action of protein-coding variations on fitness. Genome Res. 2014, 10.1101/gr.176214.114.
74. Global Genomes Initiative Golbal Genomes Initiative. http://www.mnh.si.edu/ggi/index.html.
75. Droege G., et al. The Global Genome Biodiversity Network (GGBN) Data Portal. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:D607-D612.
76. Genomics England (2014) The 100,000 genomes project. http://www.genomicsengland.co.uk/the-100000-genomes-project/.
77. O'Brochta, D. (2014) http://igtrcn.org.
78. Gregory, T.R. (2015) Animal Genome Size Database. http://www.genomesize.com/.
79. Chin C.S., et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:563-569.
80. Biosciences, P. (2014) Data Release: ~54x Long-Read Coverage for PacBio-only De Novo Human Genome Assembly http://blog.pacificbiosciences.com/2014/02/data-release-54x-long-read-coverage-for.html.
81. Voskoboynik A., et al. The genome sequence of the colonial chordate, Botryllus schlosseri. Elife 2013, 2:e00569.
82. McCoy R.C., et al. Illumina TruSeq synthetic long-reads empower de novo assembly and resolve complex, highly-repetitive transposable elements. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e106689.
83. Weisenfeld N.I., et al. Comprehensive variation discovery in single human genomes. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46:1350-1355.
84. Kajitani R., et al. Efficient de novo assembly of highly heterozygous genomes from whole-genome shotgun short reads. Genome Res. 2014, 24:1384-1395.
85. Lam E.T., et al. Genome mapping on nanochannel arrays for structural variation analysis and sequence assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:771-776.
86. Burton J.N., et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:1119-1125.
87. Genome K.C.o.S. Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10,000 vertebrate species. J. Heredity 2009, 100:659-674.
88. Robinson G.E., et al. Creating a buzz about insect genomes. Science 2011, 331:1386.
89. Goff S.A., et al. The iPlant Collaborative: Cyberinfrastructure for Plant Biology. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2:34.
90. National Science and Technology Council (2014) National Plant Genome Initiative Five-Year Plan: 2014-2018.
91. GIGA (2012) GIGA. http://giga.nova.edu.
92. Brunak S., et al. Nucleotide sequence database policies. Science 2002, 298:1333.
93. Li H., Durbin R. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature 2011, 475:493-496.
94. Nystedt B., et al. The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 2013, 497:579-584.
95. Amborella Genome Project The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science 2013, 342. 10.1126/science.1241089.
96. Denoeud F., et al. The coffee genome provides insight into the convergent evolution of caffeine biosynthesis. Science 2014, 345:1181-1184.
97. Swart E.C., et al. The Oxytricha trifallax macronuclear genome: a complex eukaryotic genome with 16,000 tiny chromosomes. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11:e1001473.
98. Fairclough S.R., et al. Premetazoan genome evolution and the regulation of cell differentiation in the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta. Genome Biol. 2013, 14:R15.
99. Moroz L.L., et al. The ctenophore genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems. Nature 2014, 510:109-114.
100. Ryan J.F., et al. The genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution. Science 2013, 342. 10.1126/science.1242592.
101. Genome sequence of the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans): vector of African trypanosomiasis. Science 2014, 344:380-386. International Glossina Genome Initiative.
102. Howe K., et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 2013, 496:498-503.
103. Amemiya C.T., et al. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 2013, 496:311-316.
104. Shaffer H.B., et al. The western painted turtle genome, a model for the evolution of extreme physiological adaptations in a slowly evolving lineage. Genome Biol. 2013, 14:R28.
105. Carbone L., et al. Gibbon genome and the fast karyotype evolution of small apes. Nature 2014, 513:195-201.
106. Marmoset Genome Sequencing, Analysis Consortium The common marmoset genome provides insight into primate biology and evolution. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46:850-857.