The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 213, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 46.e1-46.e6

  Madden, Tessa ^a   Secura, Gina M ^a   Nease, Robert F ^a   Politi, Mary C ^a   Peipert, Jeffrey F ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

contraceptive attributes; contraceptive decision making; contraceptive implant; intrauterine device; preference sensitive decision

Indexed keywords

MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONDOM; CONDOM USE; CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR; COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DRUG SAFETY; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEVONORGESTREL RELEASING INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARRIAGE; ORAL CONTRACEPTION; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEXUAL ABSTINENCE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937515547     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.051     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. W.D. Mosher, and J. Jones Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008 Vital Health Stat 23 29 2010 1 44
2. A.M. O'Connor Validation of a decisional conflict scale Med Decis Making 15 1995 25 30
3. L.N. Lessard, D. Karasek, S. Ma, and et al. Contraceptive features preferred by women at high risk of unintended pregnancy Perspect Sex Reprod Health 44 2012 194 200
4. D. Mansour International survey to assess women's attitudes regarding choice of daily versus nondaily female hormonal contraception Int J Womens Health 6 2014 367 375
5. K.Z. Donnelly, T.C. Foster, and R. Thompson What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making Contraception 90 2014 280 287
6. W.R. Grady, D.H. Klepinger, and A. Nelson-Wally Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women Fam Plann Perspect 31 1999 168 175
7. G. Lamvu, M.J. Steiner, S. Condon, and K. Hartmann Consistency between most important reasons for using contraception and current method used: the influence of health care providers Contraception 73 2006 399 403
8. J. Trussell Contraceptive failure in the United States Contraception 83 2011 397 404
9. G.M. Secura, J.E. Allsworth, T. Madden, J.L. Mullersman, and J.F. Peipert The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception Am J Obstet Gynecol 203 2010 115.e1 115.e7
10. T. Madden, J.L. Mullersman, K.J. Omvig, G.M. Secura, and J.F. Peipert Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project Contraception 88 2013 243 249
11. J.F. Peipert, T. Madden, J.E. Allsworth, and G.M. Secura Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception Obstet Gynecol 120 2012 1291 1297
12. L.B. Finer, J. Jerman, and M.L. Kavanaugh Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009 Fertil Steril 98 2012 893 897
13. V. Halpern, L.M. Lopez, D.A. Grimes, and M.F. Gallo Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4 2011 CD004317
14. T. Backman, S. Huhtala, R. Luoto, J. Tuominen, I. Rauramo, and M. Koskenvuo Advance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system Obstet Gynecol 99 2002 608 613
15. S. Garbers, A. Meserve, M. Kottke, R. Hatcher, and M.A. Chiasson Tailored health messaging improves contraceptive continuation and adherence: results from a randomized controlled trial Contraception 86 2012 536 542