A Modified TOPSIS Method for Obtaining the Associated Weights of the OWA-Type Operators

International Journal of Intelligent Systems

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1101-1116

  Liu, Fang ^a,b   Shang, Yu Fan ^a   Pan, Li Hua ^b  

^a XI'AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GUANGXI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EXPONENTIAL FUNCTIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

ARITHMETIC AVERAGING; GROUP DECISION MAKING; INDIVIDUAL PREFERENCE; MODIFIED TOPSIS METHOD; ORDERED WEIGHTED AVERAGING OPERATOR; RECIPROCAL MATRIX; SIMILARITY DEGREE; TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTIONS;

ADDITIVES;

EID: 84937515408     PISSN: 08848173     EISSN: 1098111X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/int.21737     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Yager RR,. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber 1988; 18: 183-190.
2. Cheng CH, Wei LY, Liu JW, Chen TL,. OWA-based ANFIS model for TAIEX forecasting. Econ Model 2013; 30: 442-448.
3. Kasperski A, Zieliński P,. Bottleneck combinatorial optimization problems with uncertain costs and the OWA criterion. Oper Res Lett 2013; 41: 639-643.
4. Chakraborty C, Chakraborty D,. A decision scheme based on OWA operator for an evaluation programme: an approximate reasoning approach. Appl Soft Comput 2004; 5: 45-53.
5. Wei CF, Pei Z, Li HM,. An induced OWA operator in coal mine safety evaluation. J Comput Syst Sci 2012; 78: 997-1005.
6. Yager RR, Kacprzyk J,. The ordered weighted averaging operators-theory and applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1997.
7. Yager RR,. Time series smoothing and OWA aggregation. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2008; 16: 994-1007.
8. Larsen HL,. Importance weighting and andness control in De Morgan dual power means and OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2012; 196: 17-32.
9. Emrouznejad A,. MP-OWA: the most preferred OWA operator. Knowl-Based Syst 2008; 21: 847-851.
10. Amin GR, Emrouznejad A,. Parametric aggregation in ordered weighted averaging. Int J Approx Reason 2011; 52: 819-827.
11. Peláez JI, Doña JM, Gõmez-Ruiz JA,. Analysis of OWA operators in decision making for modelling the majority concept. Appl Math Comput 2007; 186: 1263-1275.
12. Merigõ JM, Gil-Lafuente AM,. Decision-making in sport management based on the OWA operator. Exp Syst Appl 2011; 38: 10408-10413.
13. Merigõ JM,. Probabilities in the OWA operator. Exp Syst Appl 2012; 39: 11456-11467.
14. Liu F, Zhang WG, Wang ZX,. A goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 2012; 218: 747-754.
15. Lan JB, Sun Q, Chen QM, Wang ZX,. Group decision making based on induced uncertain linguistic OWA operators. Deci Supp Syst 2013; 55: 296-303.
16. Liu F, Zhang WG, Zhang LH,. A group decision-making model based on a generalized ordered weighted geometric average operator with interval preference matrices. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2014; 246: 1-18.
17. Zeng SZ, Merigo JM, Su WH,. The uncertain probabilistic OWA distance operator and its application in group decision making. Appl Mathem Model 2013; 37: 6266-6275.
18. Torra V,. OWA operators in data modeling and reidentification. IEEE Transn Fuzzy Syst 2004; 12: 652-660.
19. Sicilia MA, García-Barriocanal E, Sánchez-Alonso S,. Empirical assessment of a collaborative filtering algorithm based on OWA operators. Int J Intell Syst 2008; 23: 1251-1263.
20. Yager RR, Filev DP,. Induced ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1999; 29: 141-150.
21. Schaefer P, Mitchell HB,. A generalized OWA operator. Int J Intell Syst 1999; 14: 123-143.
22. ÒHagan M,. Aggregating template rule antecedents in real-time expert systems with fuzzy set logic. In: Proc 22nd Annu IEEE Asilomar Conf on Signals, Systems, Computers, Pacific Grov, CA; 1988. pp 681-689.
23. Fullér R, Majlender P,. On obtaining minimal variability OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2003; 136: 203-215.
24. Liu X, Chen L,. On the properties of parametric geometric OWA operator. Int J Approx Reason 2004; 35: 163-178.
25. Wang YM, Parkan C,. A minimax disparity approach obtaining OWA operator weights. Inf Sci 2005; 175: 20-29.
26. Liu X,. The solution equivalence of minimax disparity and minimum variance problems for OWA operators. Int J Approx Reason 2007; 45: 68-81.
27. Amin GR, Emrouznejad A,. An extended minimax disparity to determine the OWA operator weights. Comput Indus Engin 2006; 50: 312-316.
28. Emrouznejad A, Amin GR,. Improving minimax disparity model to determine the OWA operator weights. Inf Sci 2010; 180: 1477-1485.
29. Ahn BS,. Programming-based OWA operator weights with quadratic objective function. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2012; 20: 986-992.
30. Hwang CL, Yoon K,. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. A state of the art survey. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1981.
31. Li DF,. TOPSIS-based nonlinear-programming methodology for multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2010; 18 (2): 299-311.
32. Liang GS,. Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts. Eur J Oper Res 1999; 112: 682-691.
33. Sadi-Nezhads S, Damghani KK,. Application of a fuzzy TOPSIS method based on modified preference ratio and fuzzy distance measurement in assessment of traffic police centers performance. Appl Soft Comput 2010; 10: 1028-1039.
34. Wang YJ,. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model by associating technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution with relative preference relation. Inf Sci 2014; 268: 169-184.
35. Saaty TL, The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
36. Ma J, Fan ZP, Jiang YP, Mao JY, Mao L,. A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2006; 157: 20-33.
37. De Baets B, De Meyer H, De Loof K,. On the cycle-transitivity of the mutual rank probability relation of aposet. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2010; 161: 2695-2708.
38. Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F,. A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2007; 15 (5): 863-877.
39. Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S,. Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber Part B Cyber 2007; 37: 176-189.
40. Tanino T,. Fuzzy preferene orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1984; 12: 117-131.
41. Cabrerizo FJ, Prez IJ, Herrera-Viedma E,. Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information. Knowl-Based Syst 2010; 23: 169-181.
42. Xu ZS,. A survey of preference relations. Int J Gener Syst 2007; 36 (2): 179-203.
43. Wang T, Chen Y,. Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection. Omega 2007; 35: 384-388.
44. Mianabadi H, Afshar A, Zarghami M,. Intelligent multi-stakeholder environmental management. Exp Syst Appl 2011; 38: 862-866.
45. Yager RR,. Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. Int J Intell Syst 1996; 11: 49-73.