Reliability, responsiveness and interpretability of the neck disability index-Dutch version in primary care

European Spine Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 88-93

  Ailliet, Luc ^a   Rubinstein, S M ^a,b   de Vet, H C W ^a   van Tulder, M W ^a,b   Terwee, C B ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Interpretability; Minimal important change; Neck disability index; Responsiveness; Smallest detectable change; Standard error of measurement

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BELGIUM; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; NETHERLANDS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BELGIUM; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; NETHERLANDS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937511178     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3359-y     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH (2007) Patient reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health 10(Suppl 2):125–137
2. Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW, Koes BW, de Vet HC, Terwee CB (2012) Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 21(4):659–670
3. Schellingerhout JM, Heymans MW, Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, Koes BW, Terwee CB (2011) Measurement properties of translated versions of neck-specific questionnaires: a systemic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:87
4. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL et al (2010) International consensus on taxonomy, terminology and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient reported outcomes: result of the COSMIN study. J Clin Epidemiol 63:737–745
5. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42
6. de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL (2011) Measurement in medicine. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
7. Jorritsma W, de Vries GE, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB, Reneman MF (2012) Detecting relevant changes and responsiveness of neck pain and disability scale and neck disability index. Eur Spine J 21:2550–2557
8. Jorritsma W, de Vries GE, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB, Reneman MF (2012) Neck pain and disability scale and neck disability index: validity of Dutch language versions. Eur Spine J 21:93–100
9. Köke AJA, Heuts PHTG, Vlayen JWS, Weber WEJ (1996) Neck disability index. In: Köke AJA (ed) Meetinstrumenten chronische pijn. Deel 1 functionele status. Pijn Kennis Centrum Maastricht, pp 94–95
10. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther 14:409–415
11. De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM (2006) When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 59:1033–1039
12. Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, Mcalpine C, Goldsmith CH (2009) Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 39(5):400–417
13. Nunally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York
14. de Vet HCW, Ostelo RWJG, Terwee CB, van der Roer N, Knol DL, Beckerman H, Boers M, Bouter LM (2007) Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach. Qual Life Res 16:131–142
15. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36
16. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307
17. Van der Roer N, Ostelo RW, Bekkering GE, Van Tulder MW, De Vet HCW (2006) Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine 31:578–582
18. De Boer MR, De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Moll AC, Volker-Dieben HJ, Van Rens GH (2005) Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:1260–1268
19. Vos CJ, Verhagen AP, Koes BW (2006) Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the neck disability index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice. Eur Spine J 15:1729–1736
20. Pool JJ, Ostelo RW, Hoving JL, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW (2007) Minimal clinically important change of the neck disability index and the numerical rating scale for patients with neck pain. Spine 32:3047–3051
21. van der Velde G, Beaton D, Hogg-Johnston S, Hurwitz E, Tennant A (2009) Rash analysis provides new insight into the measurement properties of the neck disability index. Arthritis Rheum 61(4):544–551
22. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Peat G, Jordan KP, Croft P, de Vet HCW (2010) Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods. J Clin Epidemiol 63:524–534