The end of individual control over health information: Promoting fair information practices and the governance of biobank research

Principles and Practice in Biobank Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 243-266

  Lemmens, Trudo ^a,b   Austin, Lisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937501332     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. andMe. [Online] Available at: https://www.23andme.com/health/[accessed 16 December 2008].
2. Archibald, T. and Lemmens, T. 2008. Data Collection from Legally Incompetent Subjects: A Paradigm Legal and Ethical Challenge for Population Databanks. Health Law Journal (Special Edition). [Online] Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1267204.
3. Austin, L.M. 2004. Is Consent the Foundation of Fair Information Practices? Canada's Experience Under PIPEDA. University of Toronto Law Journal, 54, 183.
4. Austin, M.A., Harding, S. and McElroy, C. 2003. Genebanks: A Comparison of Eight Proposed International Genetic Databases. Community Genetics, 6, 37.
5. Bouchard, R. and Lemmens, T. 2008. Privatizing Biomedical Research-A ‘Third Way’. Nature Biotechnology, 1, 31.
6. Bovenberg, J. 2005. Whose Tissue is it Anyway? Nature Biotechnology, 23, 929.
7. Callaway, E. 2008. DNA Detectives Can DeCode ‘Censored’ Genomes. Short Sharp Science New Scientist News Blog. [Online] Available at: http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2008/10/dna-detectives-candecode-cens.html.
8. Caulfield, T. 2002. Gene Banks and Blanket Consent. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 2.
9. Caulfield, T. 2007. Biobanks and Blanket Consent: The Proper Place of the Public Good and Public Perception Rationales. Kings Law Journal, 18, 209.
10. Caulfield, T.R., Upshur, R. and Daar, A. 2003. DNA Databanks and Consent: A Suggested Policy Option Involving an Authorization Model. BMC Medical Ethics, 4(1).
11. Chaddah, M.R. 2008. The Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board: A Central REB that Works. Current Oncology, 15, 49.
12. Deschênes, M. et al. 2001. Human Genetics Research, DNA Banking and Consent: A Question of Form. Clinical Genetics, 59, 221.
13. DNA Detectives Can DeCode ‘Censured’ Genomes. 2008. [Online: New Scientist Science Blog] Available at: http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/short sharpscience/2008/10/dna-detectives-can-decode-cens.htm [accessed 1 January 2009].
14. Downie J. 2006. The Canadian Agency for the Oversight of Research Involving Humans: A Reform Proposal. Accountability in Research, 13, 75.
15. ENCODE Consortia Data Release, Data Use, and Publication. 2008. [Online: FlyBase] Available at: http://flybase.org/static_pages/news/articles/2008_09/encode_data_release _policy.pdf.
16. Glass K.C. 2006. Questions and Challenges in the Governance of Research Involving Humans: A Canadian Perspective, in Law and Ethics in Biomedical Research: Regulation, Conflict of Interest, and Liability, edited by Trudo Lemmens and Duff R. Waring. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 35.
17. Godard, B. et al. 2003. Data Storage and DNA Banking for Biomedical Research: Informed Consent, Confidentiality, Quality Issues, Ownership, Return of Benefits. A Professional Perspective. European Journal Human Genetics, 11, 88.
18. Greely, H.T. 2001. Informed Consent and Other Ethical Issues in Human Population Genetics. Annual Review of Genetics, 35, 785.
19. Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data. 1980. [Online: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development] Available at: http://www.oecd.org/document/18/0,3343, en_2649_34255_1815 186_1_1_1_1, 00.html [accessed 29 December 2008].
20. Hadskis, M. 2007. The Regulation of Human Biomedical Research, in Canada, in Canadian Health Law and Policy. 3rd Edition, edited by J. Downie, T. Caulfield and C. Flood. Canada: LexisNexis.
21. Health Canada. 1996. Guidance for Industry-Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated Guideline. [Online] Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/prodpharma/e6-eng.pdf [accessed 29 December 2008].
22. Hirtle, M., Lemmens, T. and Sprumont, D. 2000. A Comparative Analysis of Research Ethics Review Mechanisms and the ICH Good Clinical Practice Guideline. European Journal of Health Law, 7, 265.
23. Kaye, J. 2004. Broad Consent-the Only Option for Population Genetic Databases? in Blood and Data, Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Human Genetic Databases, edited by G. Árnason, S. Nordal and V. Árnason. Reykjavík: University of Iceland Press, 103.
24. Kosseim, P. and Brady, M. 2008. Policy by Procrastination: Secondary Use of Electronic Health Records for Health Research Purposes. McGill Journal of Law and Health, 2, 5.
25. Laurie, G. 2001. Genetics Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Laurie, G. 2004. Genetic Databases: Assessing the Benefits and Impact on Human and Patient Rights-A WHO Report. European Journal of Health Law, 11, 87.
27. Law Commission of Canada, The Governance of Health Research Involving Human Subjects. Ottawa: October 2000.
28. Lederer, S.E. 2005. Research without Borders: The Origins of the Declaration of Helsinki, in History and Theory of Human Experimentation, edited by U. Schmidt and A. Frewer. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 145.
29. Lemmens, T. 2005. Federal Regulation of REB Review of Clinical Trials: A Modest but Easy Step Towards an Accountable REB Structure in Canada. Health Law Review, 13.
30. Lemmens, T. and Bouchard, R. 2007. Mandatory Clinical Trial Registration: Rebuilding Trust in Medical Research, in Global Forum for Health Research, Global Forum Update on Research for Health, Volume 4: Equitable Access: Research Challenges for Health In Developing Countries. London: Pro-Book Publishing, 40-46.
31. Lemmens, T. and Freedman, B. 2000. Ethics Review for Sale? Conflict of Interest and Commercial Research Review Boards. The Milbank Quarterly, 78, 547.
32. Levy, S. et al. 2007. A New Human Genome Sequence Paves the Way for Individualized Genomics. PLoS Biology, 5, e254.
33. Luther, L. and Lemmens, T. 2007. Human Genetic Databanks: From Consent to Commercialization-An Overview of Current Concerns and Conundrums, in Biotechnology, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, edited by W. Horst Doelle and E.J. DaSilva.
34. Marshall, E. 2001. Bermuda Rules: Community Spirit, With Teeth. Science, 291, 1192.
35. McGuire, AL. and Gibbs, RA. 2006. No Longer De-Identified. Science, 312, 370-371.
36. McGuire, A.L. et al. 2008. Ethical, Legal, and Social Considerations in Conducting the Human Microbiome Project. Genome Research, 18, 1861.
37. Miller, P.B. 2006. Institutional Oversight of Clinical Trials and the Drug Approval Process. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 44(4), 679-726.
38. Motluk, A. 2005. Anonymous Sperm Donor Traced on Internet. New Scientist, 2524, 6.
39. National Council on Ethics in Human Research, Task Force for the Development of an Accreditation System for Human Research Protection Programs. 2006. Promoting Ethical Research with Humans. [Online: National Council on Ethics in Human Research] Available at: http://ncehr-cnerh.org/english/task_force [accessed 1 January 2009].
40. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. 1999. Research Involving Human Biological Materials. [Online: National Bioethics Advisory Commission] Available at: http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/hbm.pdf [accessed 29 December 2008].
41. NIH. 2008a. Background Fact Sheet on GWAS Policy Update. [Online: National Institutes of Health] Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/gwas/background_fact_sheet_20080828.pdf [accessed 18 September 2008].
42. NIH. 2008b. Modifications to Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) Data Access. [Online: National Institutes of Health] Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/gwas/data_sharing_policy_modifications_20080828.pdf [accessed 18 September 2008].
43. Nyholt, D.R., Yu, C.E. and Visscher, P.M. 2008. On Jim Watson's APOE Status: Genetic Information is Hard to Hide. European Journal of Human Genetics. [Online] Available at: http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/ejhg2008198a.html [accessed 1 January 2009].
44. Ontario HIV Treatment Network. 2008. What is the OHTN Cohort Study? [Online] Available at: http://www.ohtn.on.ca/OHTNCohort.htm [accessed 24 March 2009].
45. Patientslikeme. [Online] Available at: www.patientslikeme.com [accessed 26 December 2008].
46. Personal Genomics Project. [Online] Available at: http://www.personalgenomes.org/mission.html [accessed 22 December 2008].
47. Plan d’action ministèriel en Éthique de la recherche et en intègritè scientifique. 1998. [Online: Sante et Services sociaux] Available at: http://publications.msss.gouvqc.ca/acrobat/f/documentation/1998/98_759.pdf [accessed 30 December 2008].
48. Porter, G. 2004. The Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Informed Consent Forms as Commercial Contracts, in Blood and Data, Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Human Genetic Databases, edited by G. Árnason., S. Nordal and V. Árnason. Reykjavík: University of Iceland Press, 85. PRE. 2003.
49. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. [Online] Available at: http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/pdf/TCPS %20June 2003_E.pdf [accessed 29 December 2008].
50. Saginur, R. et al. 2008. Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board: Lessons Learned From Developing a Multicenter Regional Institutional Review Board. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 1479.
51. Sharing Data from Large-scale Biological Research Project: A System of Tripartite Responsibility: Report of a meeting organized by the Wellcome Trust and held on 14-15 January 2003 at Fort Lauderdale, USA. 2003. [Online: National Human Genome Research Institute] Available at: www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/WellcomeReport0303.pdf.
52. Singer, E. 2006. The Personal Genome Project. [Online: Technology Review] Available at: http://www.technologyreview.com/BioTech/wtr_16169,259, p1.html.
53. Summary of Principles Agreed at the First International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing. 1996. [Online: Human Genome Project Information] Available at: http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/research/bermuda.shtml [accessed 16 December 2008].
54. Te Pareake Mead, A. 1996. Genealogy, Sacredness, and the Commodities Market. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 46. The ENCODE Project: ENCylopedia of DNA Elements. [Online: National Human Genome Research Institute] Available at: http://128.231.210.112/10005107#1.
55. The Human Genome Project Race. [Online: Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering] Available at: http://www.cbse.ucsc.edu/research/research_ hgprace.shtml [accessed 29 December 2008].
56. Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law. 1949. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 181-182.
57. Wadman, M. 2008. James Watson's Genome Sequenced at High Speed. Nature, 452 (7189), 788.
58. Wheeler, D.A. et al. 2008. The Complete Genome of an Individual by Massively Parallel DNA Sequencing. Nature, 452, 872.
59. Winickoff, D. 2008. From Benefit Sharing to Power Sharing: Partnership Governance in Population Genomics Research, Working Paper No. 68, Berkeley: University of California.
60. Wiwchar, D. 2005. Long Journey Home Just the Beginning. Windspeaker, 22, 13.
61. WMA. 1964. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. [Online: World Medical Association] Available at: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm [accessed 29 December 2008].
62. Wright Clayton, E. et al. 1995. Informed Consent for Genetic Research on Stored Tissue Sample. Journal of American Medical Association, 274 (22), 1786.