Validation of an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision Code Algorithm for Identifying Chiari Malformation Type 1 Surgery in Adults

Neurosurgery

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 269-273

  Greenberg, Jacob K ^a   Ladner, Travis R ^c   Olsen, Margaret A ^b   Shannon, Chevis N ^c   Liu, Jingxia ^b   Yarbrough, Chester K ^a   Piccirillo, Jay F ^b   Wellons, John C ^c   Smyth, Matthew D ^a   Park, Tae Sung ^a   Limbrick, David D ^a  

^a ST LOUIS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Administrative data research; Chiari malformation type 1; Health services research; Neurosurgery; Validation studies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARNOLD CHIARI MALFORMATION; ARTICLE; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; ICD-9-CM; LAMINECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VALIDATION STUDY; ARNOLD-CHIARI MALFORMATION; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLIZATION; CLASSIFICATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ARNOLD-CHIARI MALFORMATION; COHORT STUDIES; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; LAMINECTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84937437741     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: 15244040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000778     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;303(13):1259-1265.
2. Simon TD, Riva-Cambrin J, Srivastava R, Bratton SL, Dean JM, Kestle JR. Hospital care for children with hydrocephalus in the United States: utilization, charges, comorbidities, and deaths. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;1(2):131-137.
3. Wen T, Attenello F, He S, et al. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in incidence of hospital acquired complications following cerebrovascular procedures. Neurosurgery. 2014;75(1):43-50.
4. Zacharia BE, Deibert C, Gupta G, et al. Incidence, cost, and mortality associated with hospital-acquired conditions after resection of cranial neoplasms. Neurosurgery. 2014;74(6):638-647.
5. Iezzoni LI. Assessing quality using administrative data. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127 (8 pt 2):666-674.
6. Jette N, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, et al. The development, evolution, and modifications of ICD-10: challenges to the international comparability of morbidity data. Med Care. 2010;48(12):1105-1110.
7. St Germaine-Smith C, Metcalfe A, Pringsheim T, et al. Recommendations for optimal ICD codes to study neurologic conditions: a systematic review. Neurology. 2012;79(10):1049-1055.
8. Meadows J, Kraut M, Guarnieri M, Haroun RI, Carson BS. Asymptomatic Chiari Type I malformations identified on magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg. 2000;92(6):920-926.
9. Strahle J, Muraszko KM, Kapurch J, Bapuraj JR, Garton HJ, Maher CO. Chiari malformation type I and syrinx in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;8(2):205-213.
10. ICD-9 CM Index to Diseases and Procedures. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.
11. Mullen MT, Moomaw CJ, Alwell K, et al. ICD9 codes cannot reliably identify hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013; 6(4): 505-506.
12. Bazarian JJ, Veazie P, Mookerjee S, Lerner EB. Accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury case ascertainment using ICD-9 codes. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(1):31-38.
13. De Coster C, Li B, Quan H. Comparison and validity of procedures coded with ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CA/CCI. Med Care. 2008;46(6):627-634.
14. Quan H, Parsons GA, Ghali WA. Validity of procedure codes in International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification administrative data. Med Care. 2004;42(8):801-809.
15. Wang MC, Laud PW, Macias M, Nattinger AB. Strengths and limitations of International Classification of Disease Ninth Revision Clinical Modification codes in defining cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(1):E38-E44.
16. Faciszewski T, Jensen R, Berg RL. Procedural coding of spinal surgeries (CPT-4 versus ICD-9-CM) and decisions regarding standards: a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(5):502-507.
17. Ramirez LF, Thisted R. Using a national health care data base to determine surgical complications in community hospitals: lumbar discectomy as an example. Neurosurgery. 1989;25(2):218-225.
18. Greenberg JK, Ladner TR, Olsen MA, et al. Complications and resource use associated with surgery for Chiari malformation type 1 in adults: a population perspective. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(2):261-268.