Propositional distances and preference representation

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2143, Issue , 2001, Pages 48-59

  Lafage, Céline ^a   Lang, Jérǒme ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

ARITHMETIC MEAN; CHOQUET INTEGRAL; LOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; PREFERENCE REPRESENTATION; REAL APPLICATIONS; REASONING ABOUT ACTIONS; SIMILARITY-BASED REASONING;

HAMMING DISTANCE;

EID: 84937429524     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. O. Bailleux, P. Marquis. DISTANCE-SAT: complexity and algorithms. Proceedings of AAAI'99, pages 642-647, 1999.
2. S. Benferhat, D. Dubois, S. Kaci and H. Prade. Encoding information fusion in possibilistic logic: A general framework for rational syntactic merging. Proceedings of ECAI'2000, 3-7.
3. I. Bloch and J. Lang. Towards mathematical morphologics. Proceedings of IPMU'2000.
4. B. Benhamou, L. Sais and P. Siegel. Two proof procedures for a cardinality-based language in propositional calculus. Proceedings of STACS'94.
5. C. Cayrol. Un modele logique pour le raisonnement revisable (in French). Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle 6, 255-284, Hermes, 1992.
6. M. Dalal. Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: preliminary report. Proceedings of AAAI'88, p. 475-479, 1988.
7. D. Dubois, J. Lang and H. Prade. Possibilistic logic. Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming (D.M. Gabbay, C.J. Hogger, J.A. Robinson, eds.), Vol. 3, 439-513, Oxford University Press. 1994.
8. F. Dupin de Saint-Cyr, J. Lang and T. Schiex., Penalty logic and its link with Dempster-Shafer theory, UAI'94, 1994.
9. K. D. Forbus. Introducing actions into qualitative simulation. Proc. IJCAI'89, 1273-1278.
10. S. Konieczny, R. Pino-Perez, On the logic of merging. Proceedings of KR'98, 488- 498, 1998.
11. S. Konieczny, R. Pino-Perez. Merging with integrity constraints. Proceedings of EC- SQARU'99, 233-244, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1638, Springer Verlag, 1999.
12. C. Lafage. Representation logique de preferences. Applicationa la decision de groupe. These de l'Unievsrte Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, 2001.
13. C. Lafage, J. Lang. Logical representation of preferences for group decision making. Proceedings of KR'2000, 457-468, 2000.
14. J.Lang. Conditional desires and utilities - An alternative approach to qualitative decision theory. Proceedings of ECAI'96, 318-322, 1996.
15. P. Liberatore and M. Schaerf. Arbitration: A commutative operator for belief revision. Proceedings of the World Conference on the Fundamentals of Artificial Research, 1995, 217-228.
16. J. Lin. Integration of weighted knowledge bases. Artificial Intelligence 83 (1996), 363-378.
17. P. Marquis and N. Porquet. Decomposing propositional knowledge bases through topics (extended abstract). Personal communication.
18. T. Murofushi and M. Sugeno. An interpretation of fuzzy measures and the Choquet integral as an integral with respect to a fuzzy measure, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 29 (1989), 201-227.
19. D. Schmeidler. Integral representation without additivity. Proc. Americ. Math. Soc. 97 (1986), 255-261.
20. S.-W. Tan and J. Pearl, Specification and evaluation of preferences for planning under uncertainty, Proc. KR'94.
21. L. van der Torre and E. Weydert. Parameters for utilitarian desires in a qualitative decision theory, Applied Intelligence, 2001, to appear.
22. R.R. Yager, On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18, p.183- 190, 1988.