The Dilemmas of Globalization

Ethics and International Affairs

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 159-172

  Reddy, Sanjay g ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937387719     PISSN: 08926794     EISSN: 17477093     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2001.tb00350.x     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Gilpin, Challenge of Global Capitalism, p. 347.
2. Challenge of Global Capitalism., p. 1, italics added.
3. The book ends, “If the United States does not resume its leadership role, the Second Great Age of Capitalism, like the first, is likely to disappear” (Challenge of Global Capitalism., p. 357).
4. Challenge of Global Capitalism., p. 50.
5. See for example Anthony Giddens, Consequences of Modernity (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991).
6. Giddens, Runaway World, p. 31.
7. On this idea see also Ulrich Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. Mark Ritter (London: Sage Publications, 1992).
8. One can think here of Locke's hostility to Catholics in A Letter Concerning Toleration. On the case of John Stuart Mill, see for example Uday Singh Mehta, Liberalism and Empire: A Study in Nineteenth-Century British Liberal Thought (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).
9. On this proposition see Roberto Mangabeira Unger, Democracy Realized: The Progressive Alternative (New York: Verso, 1998).
10. Anthropological examples are plentiful. For an argument regarding the link between increased religious self-assertion in India and the increased “thinness” of religious experience, see Sudipta Kaviraj, “Religion, Politics and Modernity,” in Crisis and Change in Contemporary India, Upendra Baxi and Bikhu Parekh, eds. (New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1995).
11. Giddens, Runaway World, p. 37.
12. Giddens goes so far in his neglect of the role of power in shaping the form of globalization that he writes of the ostensibly increasing prevalence of “reverse colonization,” in which “non-Western countries influence developments in the West” (Runaway World., p. 34).
13. Gray, False Dawn, p. 170.
14. Gray, Two Faces of Liberalism, p. 34.
15. Two Faces of Liberalism., p. 68.
16. For the idea of an overlapping consensus see John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
17. Gray, Two Faces of Liberalism, p. 105.
18. Two Faces of Liberalism.
19. Two Faces of Liberalism.
20. This is the sense in which the phrase is used by Rawls in Political Liberalism, sometimes prefaced by “mere.”
21. Hence they hold that “imperial expansion has nothing to do with imperialism” rather, “against such imperialisms, Empire extends and consolidates the model of network power.” Hardt and Negri, Empire, pp. 166–167.
22. Thus, Hardt and Negri describe the special role of the United States as deriving from its being “the only power able to manage international justice, not as a function of its own national motives, but in the name of global right” (Empire., p. 180).
23. Empire., p. 314.
24. Empire., pp. 60–61.
25. For an excellent account of such struggle between major economic powers in the postwar period see Harold James, International Monetary Cooperation since Bretton Woods (Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 1996).
26. “The multitude, in its will to be against and its desire for liberation, must push through Empire to come out the other side” (Hardt and Negri, Empire, p. 218).