Some influences on the realization of for and four in American English

Journal of the International Phonetic Association

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 175-202

  Lavoie, Lisa ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937386659     PISSN: 00251003     EISSN: 14753502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0025100302001032     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abercrombie, D. (1961). Syllable quantity and enclitics in English. In Abercrombie, D., Fry, D., MacCarthy, P. A. D., Scott,N.C.& Trim, J. L. M. (eds.), In Honour of Daniel Jones: Papers Contributed on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday, 216–222. London: Longman.
2. Abercrombie, D. (1973). A phonetician's view of verse structure. In Jones, W. & Laver, J. (eds.), Phonetics in Linguistics: A Book of Readings, 6–13. London: Longman.
3. Anderson, A., Bader, M., Bard, E. G., Boyle, E., Doherty, G., Garrod, S., Isard, S., Kowtko, J., McAllister, J., Miller, J., Sotillo, C., Thompson, H. S. & Weinert, R. (1991). The HCRC map task corpus. Language and Speech 34, 351–366.
4. Anderson, A., Brown, G., Shillcock, R. & Yule, G. (1984). Teaching Talk: Strategies for Production and Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Beckman, M. & Ayers Elam, G. (1993). Guidelines for ToBI (Tones and Break Indices) Labeling. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Research Foundation. (Version 3, 1997.)
6. Beckman, M. & Edwards, J. (1990). Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency. In Kingston, J. & Beckman, M. (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, 152–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Beckman, M. & Hirschberg, J. (1993). The ToBI annotation conventions. In Beckman & Ayers Elam (eds.), Appendix A.
8. Bell, A., Jurafsky, D., Fosler-Lussier, E., Girand, C. & Gildea, D. (1999). Forms of English function words - Effects of disfluencies, turn position, age and sex, and predictability. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 1999, 395–398. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.
9. Browman, C. & Goldstein, L. (1990). Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In Kingston, J.& Beckman, M. (eds.),Papers in Laboratory PhonologyI:Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, 341–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Browman, C. & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49, 155–180.
11. Byrd, D. (1994). Relations of sex and dialect to reduction. Speech Communication 15, 39–54.
12. Byrd, D. (1996). A phase window model framework for articulatory timing. Phonology 13, 139–169.
13. Byrd, D. (2000). Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica 57, 3–16.
14. Byrd, D., Kaun, A., Narayanan, S. & Saltzman, E. (2000). Phrasal signatures in articulation. In Broe, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon, 70–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Byrd, D. & Saltzman, E. (1998). Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries. Journal of Phonetics 26, 173–199.
16. Cummins, F. & Port, R. (1998). Rhythmic constraints on stress timing in English. Journal of Phonetics 26, 145–171.
17. de Jong, K. (1995). The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 491–504.
18. de Jong, K., Beckman, M. E. & Edwards, J. (1993). The interplay between prosodic structure and coarticulation. Language and Speech 36, 197–212.
19. Dilley, L., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Ostendorf, M. (1996). Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics 24, 423–444.
20. Fougeron, C. & Keating, P. (1997). Articulatory strengthening at the edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 3728–3740.
21. Fowler, C. A. & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers' signaling of ‘new’ and ‘old’ words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language 26, 489–504.
22. Fox Tree, J. E. & Clark, H. H. (1997). Pronouncing ‘the’ as ‘thee’ to signal problems in speaking. Cognition 62, 151–167.
23. Francis, W. N. & Kučera, H. (1982). Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
24. Gregory, M. L., Raymond, W. D., Bell, A., Fosler-Lussier, E. & Jurafsky, D. (1999). The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. In Billings, S. J., Boyle, J. P. & Griffith, A. M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 35(part 2), 151–166. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
25. Goedemans,R.(1998). Weightless Segments: A Phonetic and Phonological Study Concerning the Metrical Irrelevance of Syllable Onsets. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
26. Hammond, M. (1999). The Phonology of English: A Prosodic Optimality-Theoretic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Jun, S-A. (1993). The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
28. Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Fosler-Lussier, E., Girand, C. & Raymond, W. (1998). Reduction of English function words in Switchboard. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Speech and Language Processing 98, 3111–3114.
29. Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. (2000). Speech and Language Processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. Lavoie, L. (2001). Consonant Strength: Phonological Patterns and Phonetic Manifestations. New York: Garland.
31. Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A. (eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modeling, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32. McAllister, J., Sotillo, C., Barden, E. & Anderson, A. (1990). Using the Map Task to investigate variability in speech. Universities of Ms., Edinburgh & Glasgow.
33. Pierrehumbert, J. & Talkin, D. (1992). Lenition of/h/ and glottal stop. In Docherty, G. R. & Ladd, D. R. (eds.),Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, Segment, Prosody, 90–127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Shockey, L. (1973). Phonetic and phonological properties of connected speech. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 17, iv-143.
35. Sotillo, C. & Thompson, H. (1995). HCRC Map Task editorial conventions and markup structure. Ms., University of Edinburgh.
36. Sproat, R. & Fujimura, O. (1993). Allophonic variation in English/l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics 21, 291–311.
37. Trask, R. L. (1996). A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology. London & New York: Routledge.
38. Veilleux, N. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1998). Phonetic modification of the syllable /tu/ in two spontaneous American English dialogues. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Speech and Language Processing 98, paper 382. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.