Actions, practices and historical structures: The partition of India

International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 197-221

  Banerjee, Sanjoy ^a  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937384973     PISSN: 1470482X     EISSN: 14704838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/irap/2.2.197     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alker, H.R. (1996) Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methodologies for International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2. Alker, H.R. and Christensen, C. (1972) 'From causal modeling to artificial intelligence: the evolution of a UN peace-making simulation', in J. LaPonce and P. Smoker (eds), Experimentation and Simulation in Political Science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press
3. Bennett, A. and George, A. (1997) Process Tracing in Case Study Research, MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods. Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University
4. Brennan, L. (1993) 'The illusion of security: the background to Muslim separatism in the United Provinces', in M. Hasan (ed.), India's Partition: Process, Strategy, and Mobilization. Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 318-355
5. Cardoso, F.H. and Faletto, E. (1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press
6. Carlsnaes, W. (1992) 'The agency-structure problem in foreign policy analysis', International Studies Quarterly, 36(3), 245-270
7. Chandra, B. (1984) Communalism in Modern India. New Delhi: Vikas
8. Dessler, D. (1989) 'What's at stake in the agent-structure debate?', International Organization, 43(3), 441-473
9. Doty, R. (1997) 'Aporia: a critical exploration of the agent-structure problematique in international relations theory', European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 365-392
10. Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems of Social Theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
11. Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press
12. Hall, J. (1999) Cultures of Inquiry: From Epistemology to Discourse on Sociohistorical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. Hasan, M. (1993) 'The Muslim mass contact program: analysis of a strategy of political mobilization', in M. Hasan (ed.), India's Partition: Process, Strategy, and Mobilization. Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 132-158
14. Jalal, A. (1985) Sole Spokesman. Karachi: Oxford University Press
15. Khong, Y.F. (1992) Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press
16. Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
17. Qureshi, I.M. (1970) 'A case study of the personal relations between the Muslims and the Hindus, 1935-47', in C.H. Phillips and M.D. Wainwright (eds), The Partition of India: Policies and Perspectives, 1935-1947. London: George Allen and Unwin
18. Malik, H. (1980) Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan and Muslim Modernization in India and Pakistan. New York: Columbia University Press
19. Merriam, A. (1980) Gandhi vs Jinnah: The Debate over the Partition of India. Columbia, MO: South Asia Books
20. Pierson, P. and Skocpol, T. (2000) 'Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science', American Political Science Association Meeting. Washington, DC
21. Singh, A.I. (1987) Origins of the Partition of India 1936-1947. Delhi: Oxford University Press
22. Skocpol, T. (1979) States and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
23. Wallerstein, I. (1974) The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press
24. Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
25. Wendt, A. (1987) 'The agent-structure problem in international relations theory', International Organization, 41, 335-370
26. Wendt, A. (1992) 'Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics', International Organization, 46, 391-425