What role for parties in EU politics?

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 39-52

  Lord, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eu politics; Partyless political system

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937383858     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07036330290014651     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andeweg, R., 1995. The reshaping of national party systems. West European Politics, 18(3): 58–78.
2. Attinà, F., 1990. The voting behaviour of the European parliament members and the problem of Europarties. European Journal of Political Research, 18(3): 557–79.
3. Bardi, L., 1996. Transnational trends in European parties and the 1994 elections of the European Parliament. Party Politics, 2(1): 99–114.
4. Beetham, D., and Lord, C., 1998. Legitimacy and the European Union, Ashley, Wesley, London: Longmans.
5. Blondel, J., Sinnott, R., and Svensson, P., 1998. People and Parliament in the European Union Participation, Democracy and Legitimacy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. Brechen, P., 1999. L'Europe face au deficit démocratique. Revue Politique et Parlementaire, 1001: 5–15.
7. Butler, D., and Stokes, D., 1974. Political Change in Britain., 2nd Edn., London: Macmillan.
8. Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., and Stokes, D., 1960. The American Voter, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Corbett, R., Jacobs, F., and Shackleton, M., 1995. The European Parliament, London: Catermill.
10. van der Eijk, C., and Franklin, M., eds. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11. European Commission. 1992. The Treaty on European Union, Luxembourg: European Commission.
12. Haas, E., 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950-7, London: Stevens and Sons.
13. Hall, R., and Hitch, C., 1951. “ Price theory and business behaviour ”. Edited by: Wilson, T., and Andrews, P., Oxford: Oxford Studies in the Price Mechanism. OUP.
14. Held, D., 1996. Models of Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
15. Hix, S., 1994. The study of the European community: the challenge to comparative politics. West European Politics, 17(1): 1–30.
16. Hix, S., 1995. Political parties in the European Union political system: a comparative political approach to the development of the party federations. Unpublished PhD thesis, Florence: European University Institute.
17. Hix, S., 1998. The study of the European Union II: the new governance agenda and its rival. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1): 38–65.
18. Hix, S., 1999. The Political System of the European Union, London: Macmillan.
19. Hix, S., 2000. Legislative Behaviour and Party Competition in the EU: An Application of Nominate to the Post1999 European Parliament, One Europe or Several?, Programme Working Paper 08/00 Brighton: University of Sussex.
20. Hix, S., and Lord, C., 1996. The making of a president: the European Parliament and the confirmation of Jacques Sauter as president of the commission. Government and Opposition, 31(1): 62–76.
21. Hix, S., and Lord, C., 1997. Political Parties in the European Union, London: Macmillan.
22. Jansen, T., 1998a. The European People's Party: Origins and Development, New York: St Martin's Press.
23. Jansen, T., 1998b. “ The integration of the Conservatives into the European People's Party. ”. In Transnational Parties in the European Union, Edited by: Bell, D., and Lord, C., Ashgate: Aldershot.
24. Kreppel, A., 2000. Rules, ideology and coalition formation in the European Parliament: past, present and future. European Union Politics, 1(3): 340–363.
25. Lord, C., 2000. “ Le Nouveau Parlement Européen. ”. In Le Vote Des Quinze. Les élections européennes du 13 Juin 1999, Edited by: Grunberg, G., Perrineau, P., and Ysmal, C., Paris: Presses De La Fondation Nationale Des Sciences Politiques.
26. March, J., and Olsen, J., 1984. The new institutionalism: organisational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 77: 281–297.
27. March, J., and Olsen, J., 1989. Rediscovering Institutions, New York: Free Press.
28. March, J., and Olsen, J., 1995. Democratic Governance, New York: Free Press.
29. Peterson, J., 1997. States, societies and the European Union. West European Politics, 20(4): 1–23.
30. Pierson, P., 1997. Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2): 251–267.
31. Pridham, G., and Pridham, P., 1979. The new party federations and direct elections. The World Today, 35(2): 62–70.
32. Quermonne, J. -L. 1994. La Système Politique de l'Union Européenne, Paris: Montchrétien.
33. Raunio, T., 1996. Party Group Behaviour in the European Parliament, Tampere: University of Tampere.
34. Reif, K., and Schmitt, H., 1980. Nine second-order national elections: a conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1): 3–45.
35. Rinsche, G., and Welle, K., 1999. Mehrheit für die Mitte: Muß das Europäische Parlament sozialistisch sein?, Bonn: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
36. Schmitt, H., and Thomassen, J., 2000. Dynamic representation: the case of European integration. European Union Politics, 1(3): 340–363.
37. Tsebelis, G., 1990. Nested Games, Rational Choice in Comparative Politics, Berkeley: University of California Press.
38. Tsebelis, G., 1994. The power of the European Parliament as a conditional agenda-setter. American Political Science Review, 88(1): 128–42.
39. Tsebelis, G., and Kreppel, A., 1998. The history of conditional agenda-setting in European institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 33(1): 41–71.