Evaluation in Europe 2000: Challenges to a Growth Industry

Evaluation

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 5-12

  Leeuw, Frans L ^a  

^a European Evaluation Society ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937383454     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1358902002008001743     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chen, T. (1990) Theory-driven Evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Coleman, J.S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. (1997) The Value Added National Project: Feasibility Studies for a National System of Value-added Indicators. HayesSchool Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
4. Fitz-Gibbon, C.T. (2000) `Keynote', Paper presented at the European Evaluation Society Conference, Lausanne, 12-14 October.
5. Flap, H.D., B. Bulder and B.G.H. Völker (1998) `Intra-organizational Networks and Performance: A Review', Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory4: 109-49.
6. Frey, B.S. (1990) `Institutions Matter: The Comparative Analysis of Institutions', European Economic Review34: 443-9.
7. Gray, A., B. Jenkins and F. L. Leeuw (eds) (in press) Sharing Power: Evaluation and Management in the Collaborative State. New Brunswick, NJ: Comparative Policy Analysis Series, Transaction Books.
8. Knoepfel, P. (2000) `Policy Evaluation Games in a (Very) Federalistic State', Paper presented at the European Evaluation Society Conference, Lausanne, 12-14 October.
9. Lee, B. (2000) `Theories of Evaluation', in R. Stockmann (ed.) Evaluationsforschung. Grundlagen und ausgewählte Forschungsfelder. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
10. Leeuw, F.L. (1991) `Policy Theories, Knowledge Utilization, and Evaluation', Knowledge and Policy4: 73-92.
11. Leeuw, F.L. (2000a) `Unintended Side Effects of Auditing: The Relationship between Performance Auditing and Performance Improvement and the Role of Trust', in W. Raub and J. Weesie (eds) The Management of Durable Relations: Theoretical & Empirical Models for Households and Organization. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
12. Leeuw, F.L. (2000b) `Analyzing Program Logic: Methods Available and Problems to be Solved', Working Paper presented at the European Evaluation Society Conference, Lausanne, 12-14 October.
13. Leeuw, F.L., J. Toulemonde and A. Brouwers (1999) `Evaluation Activities in Europe: A Quick Scan of the Market in 1998', Evaluation5(4): 487-96.
14. Light, P.C. (1993) Monitoring Government; Inspectors General and the Search for Accountability. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
15. Mayne, J., T. Wileman and F.L. Leeuw (in press) `Networks and Partnering Arrangements in the Collaborative State: New Topics for Evaluation and Auditing', in A. Gray, B. Jenkins and F. L. Leeuw (eds) Sharing Power: Evaluation and Management in the Collaborative State. New Brunswick, NJ: Comparative Policy Analysis Series, Transaction Books.
16. Meyer, K. and K. O'Shaugnessy (1993) `Organizational Design and the Performance Paradox', in R. Swedberg (ed.) Explorations in Economic Sociology, pp. 249-79. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
17. Olson, M., Jr (1971) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Patton, M.Q. (2000) Keynote, Paper presented at the European Evaluation Society Conference, Lausanne, 12-14 October.
19. Pawson, R. and N. Tilley (1997) Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Picciotto, R. (2000) Keynote, Paper presented at the European Evaluation Society Conference, Lausanne, 12-14 October.
21. Pommerehne, W. (1991) `The Empirical Relevance of Comparative Institutional Analysis', European Economic Review34: 458-69.
22. Rist, R. C., J. E. Furubo and R. Sandahl (eds) (2001) International Atlas of Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Transaction.
23. Rossi, P., H. Freeman and M. Lipsey (1999) Evaluation, a Systematic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Shadish, W.R., T. Cook and L.C. Leviton (1995) `Donald T. Campbell: Methodologist of the Experimenting Society', in W. R. Shadish, T. Cook and L. C. Leviton (eds) Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice, pp. 119-71. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Smith, P. (1995) `On the Unintended Consequences of Publishing Performance Data in the Public Sector', International Journal of Public Administration18: 377-410.
26. Tilley, N. (1999) `Evaluation and Evidence-(Mis)Led Policy', Evaluation Journal of Australasia11(2): 48-64.
27. Vedung, E. (1997) Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
28. World Bank (1997) World Bank Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World. Washington, DC: World Bank.