The evaluation of retractions in sexual abuse cases

Child Abuse Review

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 94-102

  Tully, Bryan ^a  

^a Psychologists at Law Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Child abuse; Investigation; Retractions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937378556     PISSN: 09529136     EISSN: 10990852     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/car.728     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Ceci S, Bruck M. 1995. Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children’s Testimony. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.
2. Hershkowitz I. 2001. A case study of child sexual false allegation. Child Abuse & Neglect 25: 1397–1411.
3. Jones D, McGraw J. 1987. Reliable and fictitious accounts of sexual abuse of children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2: 27–45.
4. La Fontaine JS. 1994. The Extent and Nature of Organised and Ritual Abuse. HMSO: London.
5. Monck E, Bentovim A, Goodall G, Hyde C, Lwin R, Sharland E, Elton A. 1996. Child Sexual Abuse: A Descriptive and Treatment Study. Studies in Child Protection. HMSO: London.
6. Summit R. 1983. The child abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse & Neglect 7: 177–193.
7. Summit R. 1992. Abuse of the child abuse accommodation syndrome. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 1: 153–163.
8. Thompson-Cooper I. 2001. Child Welfare Professionals and Incest Families: A Difficult Encounter. Ashgate: Aldershot.
9. Tully B. 1996. Resource Manual of Specialised Investigative Interviewing. Psychologists at Law Group: London.
10. Tully B. 1999. Statement validation. In Interviewing and Deception, Canter D, Alison L (eds). Ashgate: Aldershot.
11. Tully B. 2001. Special legal requirements for competent forensic assessments of putative ‘Recovered memories’ of childhood sexual abuse in criminal trials. In Sex and Violence: The Psychology of Crimes and Risk Assessment, Farringdon D, Hollin C, McMurran M (eds). Routledge: London.