Human security in vietnam, laos, and cambodia

Contemporary Southeast Asia

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 509-527

  Lizée, Pierre P ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937377819     PISSN: 0129797X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1355/CS24-3D     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. On civil society in Southeast Asia and its role during the 1997–98 crisis, see, for example, Garry Rodan, “The Prospects for Civil Society and Political Space”, in Democracy, Human Rights, & Civil Society in South East Asia, edited by Amitav Acharya, B. Michael Frolic, and Richard Stubbs (Toronto: University of Toronto – York University Joint Centre for Asia Pacific Studies, 2001); and Pierre P. Lizée, “Civil Society and Regional Security: Tensions and Potentials in Post-Crisis Southeast Asia”, Contemporary Southeast Asia 22, no. 3 (December 2000): 550–69.
2. United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Human Development Report 1994 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).
3. Commission on Human Security, Press Release – Plan for the Establishment of the Commission on Human Security, 24 January 2001.
4. The best exposition of the Canadian efforts at that level is Rob McRae and Don Hubert, eds. (with Introduction by Lloyd Axworthy, and Foreword by Kofi Annan), Human Security and the New Diplomacy (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2001).
5. See Tadashi Yamamoto. “Human Security: What it Means and What it Entails”, in Proceedings of the 14th Asia Pacific Roundtable, June 2000 (Kuala Lumpur: ISIS-Malaysia, 2001).
6. See the rubric “human security” in David Capie and Paul Evans, The Asia-Pacific Security Lexicon (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2002).
7. The work of Amitav Acharya is certainly emblematic of this line of thought. See Amitav Acharya, “Human Security: East Versus West”, International Journal LVI, no. 3 (Summer 2001): 442–60. See also, for instance, Pranee Thiparat, ed., The Quest for Human Security: The Next Phase of ASEAN? (Bangkok: Institute of Security and International Studies, 2001).
8. A basic reference on the notion of comprehensive security is Muthiah Alagappa, “Comprehensive Security: Interpretations in ASEAN Countries”, in Asian Security Issues: Regional and Global, edited by Robert Scalapino et al. (Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California at Berkeley, 1988). A superb and detailed account of the notion of human security is found in Caroline Thomas, Global Governance, Development and Human Security. The Challenge of Poverty and Inequality (London: Pluto Press, 2000).
9. th Asia Pacific Roundtable, Kuala Lumpur, June 2001.)
10. On the positions defended by Lloyd Axworthy, see Lloyd Axworthy, “Canada and Human Security: The Need for Leadership”, International Journal (Spring 1997), pp. 183–96. On the contrast between the Axworthy position and that adopted by some Japanese scholars, see Tadashi Yamamoto, “Human Security: What it Means and What it Entails”.
11. On civil society and the role of track-three in regional security discussions, see Lizée, “Civil Society and Regional Security: Tensions and Potentials in Post-Crisis Southeast Asia”.
12. See Pierre P. Lizée, Peace, Power, and Resistance in Cambodia. Global Governance and the Failure of International Conflict Resolution (London and New York: Macmillan and St. Martin’s Press, 2000).
13. On these issues, see Kao Kim Hourn, Emerging Civil Society in Cambodia: Opportunities and Challenges (Phnom Penh: Cambodian Institute for Cooperation and Peace, 1999).
14. On the Ninth Congress of the VCP, see Margot Cohen, “Vietnam – Safety Valve of the People”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 3 May 2001, pp. 19–20.
15. On the relationship between these issues and the Ninth Congress of the VCP, see Margot Cohen and Adrian Edwards, “Vietnam – Have Your State and Eat It Too”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 22 March 2001, pp. 22, 24. On the broader context of these issues, see David Koh, “State-Society Relations in Vietnam: Strong or Weak State?, in Southeast Asian Affairs 2001 (Singapore: ISEAS, 2001).
16. On these issues, see David Koh, “The Politics of a Divided Party and Parkinson’s State in Vietnam”, Contemporary Southeast Asia 23, no. 3 (December 2001): 533– 51.
17. Shawn W. Crispin and Bertil Lintner, “Laos – Behind the Bombings”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 27 July 2000, pp. 26–27.
18. On these issues, see Yves Bourdet, “Laos in 2001: Political Introversion and Economic Respite”, Asian Survey 42, no. 1 (January/February 2002): 107–14.
19. See Sue Downie and Damien Kingsbury, “Political Development and the Reemergence of Civil Society in Cambodia”, Contemporary Southeast Asia 23, no. 1 (April 2001): 43–64, which makes explicit reference to the work of the CICP in that context.