Towards an accountability regime for an emerging European policing governance

Policing and Society

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 275-289

  den Boer, Monica ^a  

^a EULEC   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Accountability; Europe; Europol; Governance; Policing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937376004     PISSN: 10439463     EISSN: 14772728     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1043946022000046702     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andersen, M., 1989. Policing the World, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Andersen, Malcolm, Boer, Monica den, Cullen, Peter, Gilmore, William, Raab, Charles, and Walker, Neu. 1995. Policing the European Union, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3. Boer, Monica den. 2001. From networks to institutions… or vice versa? Opportunities for "Good Governance" in EU police cooperation. Collegium no. 22. XII.2001: Integrated Security in Europe, a Democratic Perspective, 36–43. Bruges: College of Europe.
4. Boer, Monica den. 1999. “ Internationale politiesamenwerking ”. In Politie. Studies Over Hoar Werking en Organisatie, Edited by: Fijnaut, Cyrille, Muller, Erwin, and Rosenthal, Uri. 577–617. Alphen a/d Rijn: Samsom. Chapter 23
5. Boer, Monica den. 2000. Not merely a matter of moving house. Police co-operation from Schengen to the TEU. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Lave, 7(4): 336–357.
6. Boer, Monica den, and Leeuwen, Marianne van. 2002. “ The EU counter-terrorism wave: window of opportunity or profound policy transformation? ”. In Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism from a European Perspective, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (forthcoming)
7. Boer, Monica den. 2002. “ The EU counter-terrorism wave: window of opportunity or profound policy transformation? ”. In Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism from a European Perspective, Edited by: Leeuwen, Marianne van. Dordrecht: Kluwer. (forthcoming)
8. Commission of the European Communities (European Anti-Fraud Office, OLAF). 2001b. Green Paper on Criminal-law Protection of the financial Interests of the Community and the Establishment of a European Prosecutor Brussels 11.12.2001, COM (2001)715 final
9. Dehousse, Franklin. 1999. Amsterdam: The Making of a Treaty, London: Kogan Page.
10. Grabbe, Heather. November 2001. Breaking new ground in internal security, chapter in Europe after September Ilth., November, London: Centre for European Reform. www.cer.org.uk.
11. Haque, M. Shamsul. 2000. Significance of accountability under the new approach to public governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66: 599–617.
12. Käyhkö, Esa. Fostering public accountability by citizen evaluation. Case: accountability in the Finnish police administration. Paper presented at 1997 Annual Conference of EGPA, Leuven. September10-131997, Belgium. (Study Group: Quality and Productivity in the Public Sector)
13. Klerlcs, P., 1995. “ Covert policing in the Netherlands ”. In Undercover; Police Surveillance in Comparative Perspective, Edited by: Fijnaut, C., and Man, G., The Hague: Kluwer.
14. Koers, Jan. 2001. Nederland als verzoekende stoat bij de wederzydse rechtshulp in strafzaken; Achtergronden, grenzen en mogelykheden, Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.
15. Mintzberg, Henry. 1983. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Monar, Jörg. 1998. “ Legitimacy of EU action in justice and home affairs: an assessment in the light of the reforms of the treaty of Amsterdam ”. In Coping with Flexibility and Legitimacy after Amsterdam, Edited by: Boer, Monica den, Guggenbühl, Alain, and Vanhoonacker, Sophie. 205–228. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.
17. Pollitt, Chris, and Bouckaert, Geert. 2000. Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Romzek, Barbara, and Dubnick, Melvin. 1987. Accountability in the public sector: lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, May/June: 227–238.
19. Schmitter, Philippe C., and Karl, Terry. 1991. What democracy is … and is not. Journal of Democracy, 2 (3) Summer: 75–88.
20. Schmitter, Philippe C., 2000. How to Democratize the European Union… and Why Bother?, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
21. Sheptycki, J.W.E., 1995. Transnational policing and the makings of a postmodern state. British Journal of Criminology, 35(4): 613–635.
22. Sheptycki, J.W.E., 1999. Political culture and structures of social control: police-related scandal in the low countries in comparative perspective. Policing and Society, 9(1): 1–31.
23. Sheptycki, J.W.E., 2001. Patrolling the new europen (in)security field; organisational dilemmas and operational solutions for policing the internal borders of Europe. The European Journal of Crime. Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 9(2): 144–158.
24. Vitorino, Antonio. 2001. Democratic Control of Europol. Europol, Conference organised by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Dutch States General. June82001, The Hague. Speech /01/274. To be found at: http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p_action
25. Walker, Neil. 1997. “ Deficient weaponry, reluctant marksmen and obscure targets: flaws in the accountability of undercover policing in the EU ”. In Undercover Policing and Accountability from an International Perspective, Edited by: Boer, Monica den. 205–216. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.
26. Walker, Neil. 2000. Policing in a Changing Constitutional Order, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
27. Weiler, Joe. 1991. The transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal, 100: 2403–2483.
28. Wyngaert, Christine van den. 1997. “ Organized crime, proactive policing and international police cooperation in criminal matters: who controls the police in a transnational context? ”. In Undercover Policing and Accountability from an International Perspective, Edited by: Boer, Monica den. 163–177. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.