On markers of expository apposition

NOWELE

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 3-51

  Pahta, Päivi ^a   Nevanlinna, Saara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937345135     PISSN: 01088416     EISSN: 22129715     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/nowele.39.01pah     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Acuña-Fariña, J.C. 1996. The Puzzle of Apposition: On So-called Appositive Structures in English. Santiago: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
2. Acuña-Fariña, J.C. 1999. 'On Apposition'. English Language and Linguistics 3:59-81.
3. Allwood, J., L. G. Andersson and Ò. Dahl. 1977. Logic in Linguistics. London, New York and Melbourne: CUP.
4. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. 1955. Eds. J. Bosworth and T.N. Toller. London.
5. The Authorized Version of the English Bible. 1953. London.
6. Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
7. Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad and E. Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
8. Blakemore, D. 1993. 'The Relevance of Reformulations'. Language and Literature 2:101-103.
9. Blockley, M. 1989. 'Old English Coordination, Apposition, and the Syntax of English Poetry'. Modern Philology 87:115-131.
10. Burton-Roberts, N. 1975. 'Nominal Apposition'. Foundations of Language 13:391-419.
11. Chadwyck-Healey Literature Online. Internet. Available at http://lion.chad-wyck.co.uk/home/home.cgi?source=config2.cfg. 1 November 1999-31 March 2000.
12. Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary. 1987. Eds. John Sinclair et al. London: Collins.
13. Cruse, D.A. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
14. Culpeper, J. and M. Kytó. 2000. 'The Conjunction am/ in Early Modern English: Frequencies and Uses in Speech-related Writing and Other Texts'. In: Generative Theory and Corpus Studies: A Dialogue from 10ICEHL. (Topics in English Linguistics 31.) Eds. R. Bermúdez-Otero, D. Denison, R.M. Hogg &C.B. McCully. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 299-326.
15. Francis, W.N. 1958. The Structure of American English. New York: Ronald.
16. Fries, C.C. 1952. The Structure of English. New York: Harcourt, Brace &Co.
17. Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (2nd ed.) London, Melbourne and Auckland: Edward Arnold.
18. Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
19. Hockett, C. 1955. 'Attribution and Apposition'. American Speech 30:99-102.
20. Huddleston, R.D. 1971. The Sentence in Written English. Cambridge: CUP.
21. Hudson, R. 1990. English Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Jones, P.M. 1989. 'Four Middle English Translations of John Arderne'. In: Latin and Vernacular: Studies in Late-medieval Texts and Manuscripts. Ed. A.J. Minnis. University of York, Center for Medieval Studies: D.S. Brewer. 61-89.
23. Kilpio, M. 1992. 'Beon'. In: Dictionary of Old English: Fascicle B. Ed. Anto-nette diPaolo Healey. Published for the Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre of Medieval Studies, University of Toronto. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
24. Klemola, J. and M. Filppula. 1992. 'Subordinating Uses of And in the History of English'. In: History of Englishes. (Topics in English Linguistics 10.) Eds. M. Rissanen, O. Ihalainen, T. Nevalainen and I. Taavitsainen. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 310-318.
25. Koskenniemi, I. 1968. Repetitive Word Pairs in Old and Early Middle English Prose: Expressions of the Type Whole and Sound and Answered and Said, and Other Parallel Constructions. (Annales Universitatis Turku-ensis, Ser. B, Tom. 107.) Turku: University of Turku.
26. Kytô, M. 1996. Manual to the Diachronic Part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding Conventions and Lists of Source Texts. (3rd ed.) Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.
27. Leech, G. 1981. Semantics. (2nd ed.) New York: Penguin.
28. Lewis, C.T. and C. Short (eds.). 1975. A Latin Dictionary. (Founded on Andrews' edition of Freund's Latin dictionary.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29. Lyons, J. [1977] 1979. Semantics. Vol. 2. Cambridge, London, New York and Melbourne: CUP.
30. MED - The Middle English Dictionary. 1952-. Eds. Hans Kurath et al. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Michigan UP. Electronic online version in Middle English Compendium. Eds. Frances McSparran et al. Humanities Text Initiative. Internet. November 1999 release. Available at http://www.hti. umich.edu/mec. 1 November 1999 - 31 March 2000.
31. Meyer, C.F. 1987. 'Apposition in English'. Journal of English Linguistics 20:101-121.
32. Meyer, C.F. 1992. Apposition in Contemporary English. Cambridge: CUP.
33. Meyer, C.F. 1995. 'Response to Nelleke Oostdijk's Review oí Apposition in Contemporary English'. ICAME Journal 19:133-138.
34. Meyer, C.F. 1997. Review of Acuña-Fariña (1996). Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 98:190-193.
35. Mitchell, B. 1985. Old English Syntax. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
36. Mustanoja, T.F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax. Part 1. (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique 23.) Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
37. Nevanlinna, S. 1974. 'Background and History of the Parenthetic As Who Say/Saith in Old and Middle English Literature'. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 75:568-601.
38. Nevanlinna, S. 1984. 'Continuity and Variation in Old English Psalm Glosses'. In: Proceedings from the Second Nordic Conference for English Studies. (Publications of the Research Institute of the Abo Akademi Foundation.) Eds. H. Ringbom and M. Rissanen. Abo: Abo Akademi. 23-36.
39. Nevanlinna, S. 1990. 'The Occurrence of Glosses in Three Late Middle English Texts: Lexical Variation'. In: Historical Linguistics and Philology. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 46.) Ed. Jacek Fisiak. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 273-289.
40. Nevanlinna, S. 1992. 'AS WHO SAY/SAITH Revisited: Form and Function'. Florilegium 11 (Special I.A.U.P.E. Issue. Carleton University Papers on Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Ed. D. Wurtele.) Ottawa: Carleton University. 61-81.
41. Nevanlinna, S. and P. Pahta. 1997. 'Middle English Nonrestrictive Expository Apposition with an Explicit Marker'. In: Studies in Middle English Linguistics. (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 103.) Ed. Jacek Fisiak. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 373-401.
42. The New English Bible. 1961. London.
43. Norri, J. 1992. Names of Sicknesses in English, 1400-1550: An Exploration of the Lexical Field. (Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae. Disser-tationes Humanarum Litterarum 63.) Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennicae.
44. ODEE = The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. 1976. Ed. C.T. Onions (with the assistance of G.W.S. Friedrichsen and R.W. Burchfield). (Reprinted with corrections.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.
45. OED = The Oxford English Dictionary. 1994 [1961]. Eds. James A.H. Murray et al. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Second revised edition on Compact Disk, Version 1.10. Eds. J.A. Simpson and E.S.C. Weiner. Oxford: OUP.
46. Onions, C.T. 1986. A Shakespeare Glossary. Enlarged and revised by R.D. Eagleson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
47. Oostdijk, N. 1994. Review of Meyer (1992). ICAME Journal 18:83-93.
48. Pahta, P. 1994. Review of Meyer (1992). Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 95: 385-387.
49. Pahta, P. and S. Nevanlinna. 1997. 'Re-phrasing in Early English: Expository Apposition with an Explicit Marker from 1350 to 1710'. In:English in Transition: Corpus-based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles. (Topics in English Linguistics 23.) Eds. M. Rissanen, M. Kyto and K. Heikkonen. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 121-183.
50. Prins, A.A. 1952. French Influence on English Phrasing. Leiden: Universitaire Pers Leiden.
51. Rissanen, M. 1993. 'The Loss of Wit "Know": Evidence from the Helsinki Corpus'. In: English Far and Wide: A Festschrift for Inna Koskenniemi. (Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Ser. B, Tom. 197.) Eds. R. Hiltunen, M. Gustafsson, K. Battarbee and L. Dahl. Turku: University of Turku. 195-206.
52. Rissanen, M., M. Kyto and M. Palander-Collin (eds.). 1993. Early English in the ComputerAge: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus. (Topics in English Linguistics 11.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
53. Robinson, F.C. 1985. Beowulf and the Appositive Style. Knoxville, Tennessee: University of Tennessee Press.
54. Ryden, M. 1966. Relative Constructions in Early Sixteenth Century English with Special Reference to Sir Thomas Elyot. (Universitatis Upsaliensis Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 3.) Uppsala: Almqvist &Wiksell.
55. Samuels, M.L. 1970. Linguistic Evolution. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 5.) Cambridge: CUP.
56. Schneider, E. 1995. Review of Meyer (1992). Language 71:207-208.
57. Sopher, H. 1971. 'Apposition'. English Studies 52:401-412.
58. Taavitsainen, I. 1997. 'Genre Conventions: Personal Affect in Fiction and Non-fiction in Early Modern English'. In: English in Transition: Corpus-based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles. (Topics in English Linguistics 23.) Eds. M. Rissanen, M. Kytò and K. Heikkonen. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 185-266.
59. The Book of Common Prayer. 1945. (Reprinted.) New York: The Church Pension Fund.
60. Thomas Thomas's Dictionarium linguae latinae et anglicanae 1587. 1945. Ed. R.C. Alston. (English Linguistics 1500-1800.) Menston: Scolar Press.
61. Visser, F. Th. 1972. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part 2. (2nd impression.) Leiden: Brill.
62. Vulgata - Biblia sacra iuxta Vulgatam Clementinam. 1950. Eds. R.P.A. Colunga and L. Turrado.
63. Wallner, B. 1987. 'On the.i. Periphrasis in the N.Y. Chauliac'. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 88:286-294.