A cognitive map of indicative and subjunctive mood use in Spanish

Pragmatics and Cognition

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 99-133

  Gregory, Amy E ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937341415     PISSN: 09290907     EISSN: 15699943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/pc.9.1.05gre     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bybee, J, Pagliuca, W. and Perkins, R. 1994. “Mood and modality”. The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 176-242.
2. Donnellan, K. 1966. “Reference and definite descriptions”. Philosophical Review 75:281-304.
3. Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
4. Fleischman, S. 1989. ‘Temporal distance: a basic linguistic metaphor”. Studies in Language 13(1): 1-50.
5. Fukushima, N. 1990. “Sobre la cláusula superregente”. In Bosque (ed), Indicativa y Subjuntiva. Madrid: Taurus, 164-179.
6. Givón, T. 1984. Syntax: A Functional Typological Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. Givón, T. 1990. Syntax: A functional Typological Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Guitart, J.M. 1991. “The pragmatics of Spanish mood in compliments of knowledge and acquisition-of-knowledge predicates”. In Fleischman and Waugh (eds), Discourse-pragmatics and the Verb: The Evidence from Romance. London: Routledge, 179-193.
9. Haverkate, H. 1992. “Politeness and mitigation in Spanish: A morpho-pragmatic analysis”. In H. Pinkster and I. Genee (eds), Unity and Diversity: Papers Presented to Simon Dik on his 50th Birthday. Amsterdam: Foris, 107-131.
10. Kiparsky, P. and Kiparsky, C. 1970. “Fact”. In M. Bierwisch and K.E. Heidolph (eds), Progress in Linguistics. The Hague and Paris: Mouton, 143-173.
11. Koike, D. A. 1992. Language and Social Relationship in Brazilian Portuguese: The Pragmatics of Politeness. Austin: University of Texas Press.
12. Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Langacker, R.W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Lunn, P. V. 1988. “Some stops on the modality line”. In D. Kibbee and D. Wanner (eds), Proceedings from Linguistic Symposium on Romance Linguistics XVIII, University of Illinois. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 221-233.
15. Lunn, P.V. 1989a. “Spanish mood and the prototype of assertability”. Language 27: 687-702.
16. Lunn, P.V. 1989b. “The Spanish subjunctive and ‘relevance’”. In C. Kirschner and J. DeCesaris (eds), Studies in Romance Linguistics. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 249-260.
17. Mejías-Bikandi, E. 1994. “Assertion and speaker’s intention: A pragmatically based account of mood in Spanish”. Hispania 77(4): 892-902.
18. Sánchez Ramírez, I. 1986. El modo en español y la teoría de los actos de habla. Doctoral Dissertation. Ball State University.
19. Sastre Ruano, M.A. 1997. El subjuntivo en Español. Salamanca: Ediciones Colegio de España.
20. Stalnaker, R. 1973. “Presuppositions”. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447-457.
21. Stockwell, R. P., Bowen, J. D. and Martin, J. 1965. The Grammatical Structures of English and Spanish. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Sweetser, E. 1982. “Root and epistemic modals: Causality in two worlds”. In M. Macaulay, O. Gensler, et al. (eds), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 484-507.
23. Sweetser, E. 1984. Semantic Structure and Semantic Change: A Cognitive Linguistic Study of Modality, Perception, Speech Acts, and Logical Relations. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
24. Sweetser, E. 1990. “Modality”. From Etymology to Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 49-75.
25. Terrell, T D. and Hooper, J. 1974. “A semantically based analysis of mood in Spanish”. Hispania 57: 484-494.